Current Cardiology Reports

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 110–117 | Cite as

Tricuspid valve repair for treatment and prevention of secondary tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery

  • Ani C. Anyanwu
  • Joanna Chikwe
  • David H. Adams


Secondary or functional tricuspid regurgitation occurring late after mitral valve surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In this article, we review the pathophysiology of secondary tricuspid regurgitation and the evidence supporting the use of tricuspid valve annuloplasty for preventing and treating secondary tricuspid regurgitation. Liberal application of tricuspid valve annuloplasty is recommended to prevent progression of secondary regurgitation, as contrary to widely held opinion, fixing the left-sided valve dysfunction often does not resolve secondary tricuspid valve dysfunction. Based on existing literature, assessing the tricuspid valve annular dimensions can be recommended as part of all mitral valve operations, and annuloplasty strongly considered in patients with tricuspid annular dilatation or moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation.


Mitral Valve Tricuspid Valve Tricuspid Regurgitation Mitral Valve Replacement Mitral Valve Repair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Messer AL, Hurst JW, Rappaport MB, Sprague HB: A study of the venous pulse in tricuspid valve disease. Circulation 1950, 1:388–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braunwald NS, Ross J, Jr, Morrow AG: Conservative management of tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. Circulation 1967, 35(4 Suppl): I63–I69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carpentier A, Deloche A, Hanania G, et al.: Surgical management of acquired tricuspid valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1974, 67:53–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    King RM, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, et al.: Surgery for tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 1984, 70(3 Pt 2):I193–I197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dreyfus GD, Corbi PJ, Chan KM, Bahrami T: Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilatation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair? Ann Thorac Surg 2005, 79:127–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sagie A, Schwammenthal E, Padial LR, et al.: Determinants of functional tricuspid regurgitation in incomplete tricuspid valve closure: Doppler color flow study of 109 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994, 24:446–453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fukuda S, Gillinov AM, Song JM, et al.: Echocardiographic insights into atrial and ventricular mechanisms of functional tricuspid regurgitation. Am Heart J 2006, 152:1208–1214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ton-Nu TT, Levine RA, Handschumacher MD, et al.: Geometric determinants of functional tricuspid regurgitation: insights from 3-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 2006, 114:143–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpentier A: Cardiac valve surgery–the “French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983, 86:323–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park YH, Song JM, Lee EY, et al.: Geometric and hemodynamic determinants of functional tricuspid regurgitation: a real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study. Int J Cardiol 2007, [Epub ahead of print.]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadeghi HM, Kimura BJ, Raisinghani A, et al.: Does lowering pulmonary arterial pressure eliminate severe functional tricuspid regurgitation? Insights from pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:126–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Menzel T, Kramm T, Wagner S, et al.: Improvement of tricuspid regurgitation after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2002, 73:756–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim HK, Kim YJ, Park JS, et al.: Determinants of the severity of functional tricuspid regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:236–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tei C, Pilgrim JP, Shah PM, et al.: The tricuspid valve annulus: study of size and motion in normal subjects and in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation 1982, 66:665–671.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fukuda S, Saracino G, Matsumura Y, et al.: Three-dimensional geometry of the tricuspid annulus in healthy subjects and in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation: a real-time, 3-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation 2006, 114(1 Suppl 1):I492–I498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sukmawan R, Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, et al.: Geometric changes of tricuspid valve tenting in tricuspid regurgitation secondary to pulmonary hypertension quantified by novel system with transthoracic real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007, 20:470–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mogollon MV, Lage E, Cabezon S, et al.: Combination therapy with sildenafil and bosentan reverts severe pulmonary hypertension and allows heart transplantation: case report. Transplant Proc 2006, 38:2522–2523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Porter A, Shapira Y, Wurzel M, et al.: Tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement: clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. J Heart Valve Dis 1999, 8:57–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sagie A, Schwammenthal E, Newell JB, et al.: Significant tricuspid regurgitation is a marker for adverse outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994, 24:696–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sagie A, Schwammenthal E, Palacios IF, et al.: Significant tricuspid regurgitation does not resolve after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994, 108:727–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Song H, Kang DH, Kim JH, et al.: Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty versus surgical treatment in mitral stenosis with severe tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation 2007, 116(11 Suppl):I246–I250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matsuyama K, Matsumoto M, Sugita T, et al.: Predictors of residual tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003, 75:1826–1828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matsunaga A, Duran CM: Progression of tricuspid regurgitation after repaired functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 2005, 112(9 Suppl):I453–I457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Groves PH, Ikram S, Ingold U, Hall RJ: Tricuspid regurgitation following mitral valve replacement: an echocardiographic study. J Heart Valve Dis 1993, 2:273–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Colombo T, Russo C, Ciliberto GR, et al.: Tricuspid regurgitation secondary to mitral valve disease: tricuspid annulus function as guide to tricuspid valve repair. Cardiovasc Surg 2001, 9:369–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nath J, Foster E, Heidenreich PA: Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:405–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Izumi C, Iga K, Konishi T: Progression of isolated tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease. J Heart Valve Dis 2002, 11:353–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Groves PH, Lewis NP, Ikram S, et al.: Reduced exercise capacity in patients with tricuspid regurgitation after successful mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral valve disease. Br Heart J 1991, 66:295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boyaci A, Gokce V, Topaloglu S, et al.: Outcome of significant functional tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement for predominant rheumatic mitral stenosis. Angiology 2007, 58:336–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kwon DA, Park JS, Chang HJ, et al.: Prediction of outcome in patients undergoing surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation following mitral valve surgery and role of tricuspid annular systolic velocity. Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:659–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keogh BE, Kinsman R: Fifth National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report 2003. Henley-on-Thames, UK: Dendrite Clinical Systems; 2004.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Staab ME, Nishimura RA, Dearani JA: Isolated tricuspid valve surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation following prior left heart valve surgery: analysis of outcome in 34 patients. J Heart Valve Dis 1999, 8:567–574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McCarthy PM, Bhudia SK, Rajeswaran J, et al.: Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 127:674–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hornick P, Harris PA, Taylor KM: Tricuspid valve replacement subsequent to previous open heart surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 1996, 5:20–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al.: ACC/ AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2006, 114:E84–E231. [Published erratum appears in Circulation 2007, 115:E409.]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rivera JM, Vandervoort PM, Vazquez de Prada JA, et al.: Which physical factors determine tricuspid regurgitation jet area in the clinical setting? Am J Cardiol 1993, 72:1305–1309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kuwaki K, Morishita K, Tsukamoto M, Abe T: Tricuspid valve surgery for functional tricuspid valve regurgitation associated with left-sided valvular disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001, 20:577–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McCarthy PM: Adjunctive procedures in degenerative mitral valve repair: tricuspid valve and atrial fibrillation surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007, 19:121–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Filsoufi F, Salzberg SP, Coutu M, Adams DH: A three-dimensional ring annuloplasty for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 2006, 81:2273–2277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Anwar AM, Geleijnse ML, Soliman OI, et al.: Assessment of normal tricuspid valve anatomy in adults by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007, 23:717–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Carpentier A, Deloche A, Dauptain J, et al.: A new reconstructive operation for correction of mitral and tricuspid insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1971, 61:1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    De Vega NG, De Rabago G, Castillon L, et al.: A new tricuspid repair. Short-term clinical results in 23 cases. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1973, Spec No:384–386.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tang GH, David TE, Singh SK, et al.: Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes. Circulation 2006, 114(1 Suppl):I577–I581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rankin JS, Hammill BG, Ferguson TB, Jr, et al.: Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 131:547–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Medicine Group LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryMount Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations