Current Cardiology Reports

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 343–346 | Cite as

Ablation of atrial fibrillation

Article

Abstract

Fueled by dissatisfaction with pharmacologic strategies to treat atrial fbrillation (AF), the results of basic and clinical investigation into the understanding of AF initiation and maintenance mechanisms, and the explosive development in catheter-based technologies, AF ablation has matured from a purely investigational technique to a preferred, safe, and effective approach for curing AF, particularly with the circumferential approach. Future insights and developments will help us refine our treatment strategies in patients with permanent AF, making chronic AF ablation safer, faster, and more effective. As the prevalence of AF in the general population continues to increase, the purpose of optimizing our strategy becomes evermore important and more pressing.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al.: Spontaneous initiation of atrial fbrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998, 339:659–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, et al.: Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of PV ostia. Circulation 2000, 102:2619–2628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oral H, Chugh A, Good E, et al.: A tailored approach to catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fbrillation. Circulation 2006, 113:1824–1831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox JL: Cardiac surgery for arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004, 15:260–262.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pappone C, Santinelli V: The who, what, why, and how-to guide for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004, 15:1226–1230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oral H, Scharf C, Chugh A, et al.: Catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF: segmental PV ostial ablation vs. left atrial ablation. Circulation 2003, 108:2355–2360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, et al.: A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fbrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:2044–2053. This paper tested the hypothesis that complex fractionated electrograms could be used as targets for AF ablation.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pappone C, Santinelli V, Manguso F, et al.: Pulmonary vein denervation enhances longterm benefit after circumferential ablation for paroxysmal AF. Circulation 2004, 109:327–334. This paper represents the first clinical documentation of additional benefit of vagal denervation on AF recurrences after AF ablation as performed in Milan.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pappone C, Manguso F, Vicedomini G, et al.: Prevention of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia after ablation of atrial fbrillation. A prospective randomized study comparing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with a modified approach. Circulation 2004, 110:3036–3042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scherlag BJ, Nakagawa H, Jackman W, et al.: Electrical stimulation to identify neural elements on the heart: their role in atrial fibrilation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2005, 13:1–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al.: Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with AF. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1825–1833.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pappone C, Rosanio S, Augello G, et al.: Mortality, morbidity, and quality of life after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fbrillation: outcomes from a controlled nonrandomized long-term study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42:185–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pappone C, Santinelli V: Atrial fbrillation ablation: a realistic alternative to pharmacologic therapy. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005, 2:608–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pappone C, Santinelli V: Atrial fbrillation ablation: state of the art. Am J Cardiol 2005 96:59L-64L.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Sanders P, et al.: Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fbrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005, 16:1138–1147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haissaguerre M, Sanders P, Hocini M, et al.: Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fbrillation: critical structures for termination. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005, 16:1125–1137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al.: Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fbrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1390–1400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CardiologySan Raffaele University HospitalMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations