Current Cardiology Reports

, 4:13

The classification of pericardial disease in the age of modern medicine

  • Bernhard Maisch
  • Arsen D. Ristić
Article

Abstract

The spectrum of pericardial diseases comprises pericarditis, pericardial neoplasms, cysts, and congenital defects. Due to the insufficient diagnostic value of standard, noninvasive diagnostic techniques, many cases remained etiologically unclear, and were therefore classified as idiopathic. A major improvement in the classification of pericardial disease is its clear distinction between the two most frequent forms of idiopathic pericarditis: viral infection and autoreactive pericarditis. This classification has major therapeutic consequences. In autoreactive forms, systemic and intrapericardial corticosteroid treatment has a favorable effect; its application in viral forms is contraindicated. The new classification of pericardial diseases synthesizes the achievements of modern imaging with molecular biology and immunology. Systematic implementation of new techniques of pericardial fluid analyses, pericardioscopy and pericardial biopsy, and the application of molecular biology and immunology techniques have opened new windows to the pericardial diseases, permitting early specific diagnosis, and creating foundations for etiologic treatment in many cases.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Butany J: The pericardium and its diseases. In Cardiovascular Pathology. Edited by Silver DM. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1991:847–894.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spodick DH: The Pericardium: A Comprehensive Textbook. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997:260.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    An excellent, single-author textbook covering all aspects of pericardial diseasesGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maisch B: Pericardial diseases with a focus on etiology, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, new diagnostic imaging methods, and treatment. Curr Opin Cardiol 1994, 9:379–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maisch B, Bethge C, Drude L, et al.: Pericardioscopy and epicardial biopsy: new diagnostic tools in pericardial and perimyocardial diseases. Eur Heart J 1994, 15(Suppl. C):68–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    •Maisch B, Pankuweit S, Brilla C, et al.: Intrapericardial treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic pericarditis guided by pericardioscopy and epicardial biopsy: results from a pilot study. Clin Cardiol 1999, 22(Suppl 1):I17-I22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reports our preliminary data on intrapericardial etiologic treatment, based on the application of pericardioscopy, aimed epicardial biopsy and immunology, and molecular biology techniques in evaluation of pericardial fluid and tissue

  1. 7.
    Maisch B: The heart in rheumatic disease. In Rheumatic Diseases and Sport. Edited by Baenkler HW. Basel: S. Karger; 1992:81–117.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    Browning CA, Bishop RL, Heilpern RJ, et al.: Accelerated constrictive pericarditis in procainamide-induced systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Cardiol 1984, 53:376–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 9.
    Spodick DH: The Pericardium: a Comprehensive Textbook. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997:411.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Noguchi M, Nakajima T, Hirohashi S, et al.: Immunohistochemical distinction of malignant mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma with anti-surfactant apoprotein anti-Lewis a, and anti-Tn antibodies. Hum Pathol 1989, 20:53–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 11.
    •Pankuweit S, Wadlich A, Meyer E, et al.: Cytokine activation in pericardial fluids in different forms of pericarditis. Herz 2000, 25:748–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

This paper reveals the activation of pericardial cytokines in pericardial effusion and serum in various types of pericarditis

  1. 12.
    Permanyer-Miralda G, Sagrista-Sauleda J, Soler-Soler J: Primary acute pericardial disease: a prospective series of 231 consecutive patients. Am J Cardiol 1985,56:623–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 13.
    •Soler-Soler J, Sagrista-Sauleda J, Permanyer-Miralda G: Management of pericardial effusion. Heart 2001, 86:235–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comprehensive review on the management of pericardial diseases, representing the conservative approach in their evaluation and treatment

  1. 14.
    Garcia LW, Ducatman BS, Wang HH: The value of multiple fluid specimens in the cytological diagnosis of malignancy. Mod Pathol 1994, 7:665–668.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 15.
    Krikorian JG, Hancock EW: Pericardiocentesis. Am J Med 1978, 65:808–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 16.
    Corey GR, Campbell PT, Van Trigt P, et al.: Etiology of large pericardial effusions. Am J Med 1993, 95:209–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 17.
    Meyers DG, Meyers RE, Prendergast TW: The usefulness of diagnostic tests on pericardial fluid. Chest 1997, 111:1213–1221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 18.
    Chen CJ, Chang SC, Tseng HH: Assessment of immunocytochemical and histochemical stainings in the distinction between reactive mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells in body effusions. Chung Hua Hsueh Tsa Chih Taipei 1994, 54:149–155.Google Scholar
  6. 19.
    Ng TT, Strang JI, Wilkins EG: Serodiagnosis of pericardial tuberculosis. QJM 1995, 88:317–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 20.
    Fijalkowska A, Szturmowicz M, Tomkowski W, et al.: The value of measuring adenosine deaminase activity in pericardial effusion fluid for diagnosing the etiology of pericardial effusion. Pneumonol Alergol Pol 1996, 64(Suppl 2):174–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 21.
    Komsuoglu B, Goldeli O, Kulan K, Komsuoglu SS: The diagnostic and prognostic value of adenosine deaminase in tuberculous pericarditis. Eur Heart J 1995, 16:1126–1130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 22.
    Koh KK, Kim EJ, Cho CH, et al.: Adenosine deaminase and carcinoembryonic antigen in pericardial effusion diagnosis, especially in suspected tuberculous pericarditis. Circulation 1994, 89:2728–2735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 23.
    •Aggeli C, Pitsavos C, Brili S, et al.: Relevance of adenosine deaminase and lysozyme measurements in the diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis. Cardiology 2000, 94:81–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

A recent paper confirming the role of adenosine deaminase in early diagnosis for tuberculous pericarditis, and introducing lysozyme measurements for the first time

  1. 24.
    •Dogan R, Demircin M, Sarigul A, et al.: Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase activity in pericardial fluids. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1999, 40:501–504.Google Scholar

A recent paper confirming the role of adenosine deaminase in early diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis

  1. 25.
    Maisch B, Drude L: Pericardioscopy: a new diagnostic tool in inflammatory diseases of the pericardium. Eur Heart J 1991, 12 (Suppl D):2–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 26.
    •Seferovi PM, Risti AD, Maksimovi R, et al.: Flexible percutaneous pericardioscopy: inherent drawbacks and recent advances. Herz 2000, 25:741–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paper revealing the contribution of technical advances to the feasibility and diagnostic value of flexible percutaneous pericardioscopy

  1. 27.
    Seferovic PM, Ristic AD, Maksimovic R: New trends in flexible percutaneous pericardioscopy. In Pericardiology: Contemporary Answers to Continuing Challenges. Edited by Seferovic PM, Spodick DH, Maisch B, et al. Belgrade: Science; 2000:155–170.Google Scholar
  2. 28.
    •Seferovic PM, Ristic AD, Maksimovic R: Pericardial biopsy: technical aspects, diagnostic value and complications. In Pericardiology: Contemporary Answers to Continuing Challenges. Edited by SeferovicPM, SpodickDH, MaischB, et al. Belgrade: Science; 2000:171–190.Google Scholar

A book chapter revealing the diagnostic value of pericardial (parietal) endoscopic biopsy

  1. 29.
    Ristic AD, Maisch B: New frontiers of percutaneous flexible pericardioscopy: detection of neoplastic pericardial involvement by autofluorescence phenomena [abstract]. Eur Heart J 2000, 21(Suppl Aug/Sept):417.Google Scholar
  2. 30.
    Marcon NE. Is light-induced fluorescence better than the endoscopist’s eye? Can J Gastroenterol 1999, 13:417–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 31.
    Filbeck T, Roessler W, Knuechel R, et al.: Clinical results of the transurethreal resection and evaluation of superficial bladder carcinomas by means of fluorescence diagnosis after intravesical instillation of 5-aminolevulinic acid. J Endourol 1999, 13:117–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 32.
    Lam S, Kennedy T, Unger M, et al.: Localization of bronchial intraepithelial neoplastic lesions by fluorescence bronchoscopy. Chest 1998, 113:696–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 33.
    Svanberg K, Wang I, Colleen S, et al.: Clinical multi-colour fluorescence imaging of malignant tumours: initial experience. Acta Radiol 1998, 39:2–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 34.
    Maisch B, Schonian U, Crombach M, et al.: Cytomegalovirus associated inflammatory heart muscle disease. Scand J Infect Dis 1993, 88(Suppl 1):135–148.Google Scholar
  7. 35.
    Levy R, Najioullah F, Thouvenot D, et al.: Evaluation and comparison of PCR and hybridization methods for rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical samples. J Virol Methods 1996, 62:103–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 36.
    Satoh T: Demonstration of the Epstein-Barr genome by the polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridisation in a patient with viral pericarditis. Br Heart J 1993, 69:563–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 37.
    Andreoletti L, Hober D, Belaich S, et al.: Rapid detection of enterovirus in clinical specimens using PCR and microwell capture hybridization assay. J Virol Methods 1996, 62:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 38.
    Fujioka S, Koide H, Kitaura Y, et al.: Molecular detection and differentiation of enteroviruses in endomyocardial biopsies and pericardial effusions from dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis. Am Heart J 1996, 131:760–765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 39.
    Maisch B, Maisch S, Kochsiek K: Immune reactions in tuberculous and chronic constrictive pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1982, 50:1007–1013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 40.
    Noguchi M, Nakajima T, Hirohashi S, et al.: Immunohistochemical distinction of malignant mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma with anti-surfactant apoprotein, anti-Lewis a, and anti-Tn antibodies. Hum Pathol 1989, 20:53–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 41.
    •Maisch B, Risti AD, Seferovi PM: New directions in diagnosis and treatment of pericardial disease: an update by the Taskforce on Pericardial Disease of the World Heart Federation. Herz 2000, 25:769–80. A comprehensive review of the new directions and perspectives in pericardial diseases.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernhard Maisch
    • 1
  • Arsen D. Ristić
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine-CardiologyPhilipps UniversityMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations