Current Cardiology Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 173–174 | Cite as

Differences in outcome between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary bypass grafting

  • Joseph S. Alpert
Editor’s Commentary
  • 16 Downloads

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, et al.: Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II). 30 day and one-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 37:51–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Puel J, Karouny E, Marco F, et al.: Angioplasty versus surgery in multi-vessel disease: immediate results and in-hospital outcome in a randomized prospective study [abstract]. Circulation 1992, 86(Suppl I):372.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodriguez A, Boullon F, Perez-Balino, et al.: Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in hospital results and 1 year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993, 22:1060–1067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    RITA Trial Participants: Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1993, 341:573–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, et al.: A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994, 331:1037–1043.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    King SB III, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS, et al.: A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994, 331:1044–1050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    CABRI Trial Participants: Coronary Angioplasty vs. Bypass Revascularization Investigation (CABRI) results during the first year. Lancet 1995, 346:1179–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators: Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryan TJ: Present-day PTCR versus CABG: a randomized comparison with a different focus and a new result. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 37:59–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boden W, O’Rourke R, Crawford M, et al.: Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an "invasive" as compared with a conservative management strategy. N Engl J Med 1998, 338:1785–1792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study Investigators: Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph S. Alpert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of Arizona Health Sciences CenterTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations