Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 25–31 | Cite as

Vaginal Prolapse Repair—Native Tissue Repair versus Mesh Augmentation: Newer Isn’t Always Better

  • Shunaha Kim-Fine
  • John A. Occhino
  • John B. Gebhart
Female Stress Incontinence and Prolapse (R Dmochowski, Section Editor)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to update the female urology and urogynecologic community on the controversy regarding approaches to vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. We will review the salient issues in traditional, vaginal native-tissue (NT) repair for pelvic organ prolapse. We intend to provide arguments advocating vaginal NT repair over that of vaginal mesh-augmented (MA) repair, and to show that newer is not always better.

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapse Transvaginal mesh Pelvic surgery Vaginal surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Swift S, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):795–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Jama. 2008;300(11):1311–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rortveit G, Brown JS, Thom DH, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1396–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tegerstedt G, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyren O, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(6):497–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, et al. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, et al. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(5):501 e501-507.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ridley JH. A composite vaginal vault suspension using fascia lata. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126(5):590–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1299–304. discussion 1304–1296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Administration. FaD. In: Administration FaD, editor. FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Silver Springs, MD: FDA; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Administration FaD. FDA safety communication: UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. In: Administration FaD, editor. Silver. Spring (MD): FDA; 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36(4):897–909.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(2):311–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Colombo M, Vitobello D, Proietti F, et al. Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Bjog. 2000;107(4):544–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S, et al. High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1339–42. discussion 1342–1333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amundsen CL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD. Anatomical correction of vaginal vault prolapse by uterosacral ligament fixation in women who also require a pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 2003;169(5):1770–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, et al. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1402–10. discussion 1410–1401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenkins 2nd VR. Uterosacral ligament fixation for vaginal vault suspension in uterine and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(6):1337–43. discussion 1343–1334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, et al. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1365–73. discussion 1373–1364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Webb MJ, Aronson MP, Ferguson LK, et al. Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(2):281–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):600–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ, 3rd, et al. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):664 e661-667.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, et al. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(2 Pt 1):367–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murphy M. Clinical practice guidelines on vaginal graft use from the society of gynecologic surgeons. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):1123–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, et al. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):213–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sung VW, Rogers RG, Schaffer JI, et al. Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):1131–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1826–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, et al. One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):86 e81-89.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1357–62. discussion 1362–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, et al. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):242–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, et al. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):235 e231-238.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4):891–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dviri M, Leron E, Dreiher J, et al. Increased matrix metalloproteinases-1,-9 in the uterosacral ligaments and vaginal tissue from women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):113–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moalli PA, Talarico LC, Sung VW, et al. Impact of menopause on collagen subtypes in the arcus tendineous fasciae pelvis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(3):620–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gebhart JB, Rickard DJ, Barrett TJ, et al. Expression of estrogen receptor isoforms alpha and beta messenger RNA in vaginal tissue of premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1325–30. discussion 1330–1321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zong W, Zyczynski HM, Meyn LA, et al. Regulation of MMP-1 by sex steroid hormones in fibroblasts derived from the female pelvic floor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):349 e341-311.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(9):1582–91. quiz 1581, 1592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Talley NJ, Fleming KC, Evans JM, et al. Constipation in an elderly community: a study of prevalence and potential risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91(1):19–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Hsu Y, et al. Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):324–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    (ACGME) ACfGME. Obstetrics and gynecology case logs 2011; 2011.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Raalte H, Lucente V, Haff R, et al. Prolift: an innovative delivery system for transvaginal placement of synthetic grafts for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. J Pelvic Med Surg. 2007;13:351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miller D, Lucente V, Babin E, et al. Prospective clinical assessment of the transvaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolaspe - 5-year results. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruc Surg. 2011;17:139–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak D, Darrow A, et al. Does sexual function change after surgery for stress urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse? A multicenter prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(5):e1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Haase P, Skibsted L. Influence of operations for stress incontinence and/or genital descensus on sexual life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(7):659–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR, et al. Sexual function in women with uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(4):483–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pauls RN, Silva WA, Rooney CM, et al. Sexual function after vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):622 e621-627.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Occhino JA, Trabuco EC, Heisler CA, et al. Changes in vaginal anatomy and sexual function after vaginal surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(7):799–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Helstrom L, Nilsson B. Impact of vaginal surgery on sexuality and quality of life in women with urinary incontinence or genital descensus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(1):79–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Blandon RE, Gebhart JB, Trabuco EC, et al. Complications from vaginally placed mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(5):523–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shunaha Kim-Fine
    • 1
  • John A. Occhino
    • 1
  • John B. Gebhart
    • 1
  1. 1.Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Gynecologic SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations