Advertisement

An Update on Gender Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease Care

  • Tina ShahEmail author
  • Nicolas Palaskas
  • Ameera Ahmed
Coronary Heart Disease (S. Virani and S. Naderi, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Coronary Heart Disease

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD), traditionally considered a male disease, causes far more deaths in women than cancer. The prevalence of CHD is lower in women at any age, but with advancing age, this differential decreases. The clinical outcomes including myocardial infarction mortality, all-cause mortality, and reinfarction rates are also worse in women with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) than in men. Yet, women appear to be underdiagnosed and undertreated for coronary heart disease. There is still a gap in the knowledge, understanding, and general awareness of CHD in women. This review provides updates in gender disparities in the management of risk factors, treatments, and outcomes of coronary heart disease.

Keywords

Gender Differences Disparities Coronary heart disease Women 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Tina Shah, Nicolas Palaskas, and Ameera Ahmed declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(10):1–93.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mosca L, Mochari-Greenberger H, Dolor RJ, Newby LK, Robb KJ. Twelve-year follow-up of American women's awareness of cardiovascular disease risk and barriers to heart health. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(2):120–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.•
    Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29–322. Updates on the latests statistics of heart disease in men and women.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim C, Hofer TP, Kerr EA. Review of evidence and explanations for suboptimal screening and treatment of dyslipidemia in women. A conceptual model. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(10):854–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearson TA, Laurora I, Chu H, Kafonek S. The lipid treatment assessment project (L-TAP): a multicenter survey to evaluate the percentages of dyslipidemic patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy and achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(4):459–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mosca L, Appel LJ, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Chandra-Strobos N, Fabunmi RP, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women. American Heart Association scientific statement. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(3):e29–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mosca L, Linfante AH, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Hayes SN, Walsh BW, et al. National study of physician awareness and adherence to cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Circulation. 2005;111(4):499–510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson JL, Dolor RJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(12):1404–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Melloni C, Berger JS, Wang TY, Gunes F, Stebbins A, Pieper KS, et al. Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(2):135–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Möller-Leimkühler AM. Gender differences in cardiovascular disease and comorbid depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2007;9(1):71–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;111(2):383–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sader MA, Celermajer DS. Endothelial function, vascular reactivity and gender differences in the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53(3):597–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom G, Virmani R. Effect of menopause on plaque morphologic characteristics in coronary atherosclerosis. Am Heart J. 2001;141(2 Suppl):S58–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, Reis SE, Smith KM, Handberg EM, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2825–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yahagi K, Davis HR, Arbustini E, Virmani R. Sex differences in coronary artery disease: pathological observations. Atherosclerosis. 2015;239(1):260–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niccoli G, Scalone G, Crea F. Acute myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis: mechanisms and management. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(8):475–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anand SS, Islam S, Rosengren A, Franzosi MG, Steyn K, Yusufali AH, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in women and men: insights from the INTERHEART study. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(7):932–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bushnell C, McCullough LD, Awad IA, Chireau MV, Fedder WN, Furie KL, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(5):1545–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chou AF, Scholle SH, Weisman CS, Bierman AS, Correa-de-Araujo R, Mosca L. Gender disparities in the quality of cardiovascular disease care in private managed care plans. Womens Health Issues. 2007;17(3):120–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rossi MC, Cristofaro MR, Gentile S, Lucisano G, Manicardi V, Mulas MF, et al. Sex disparities in the quality of diabetes care: biological and cultural factors may play a different role for different outcomes: a cross-sectional observational study from the AMD Annals initiative. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(10):3162–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davidson MH, Maki KC, Karp SK, Ingram KA. Management of hypercholesterolaemia in postmenopausal women. Drugs Aging. 2002;19(3):169–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA. 1993;269(23):3015–23.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.••
    Puri R, Nissen SE, Shao M, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Chapman MJ, et al. Sex-related differences of coronary atherosclerosis regression following maximally intensive statin therapy: insights from SATURN. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(10):1013–22. The study showed that women with coronary disease demonstrate greater coronary atheroma regression than men when treated with guideline-driven potent statin therapy. It is a very important finding and supports the use of guideline based statin therapy in women.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.••
    Virani SS, Woodard LD, Ramsey DJ, Urech TH, Akeroyd JM, Shah T, et al. Gender disparities in evidence-based statin therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(1):21–6. Highlights differences in use of statin therapy in the Veteran population.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bairey Merz CN, Johnson BD, Sharaf BL, Bittner V, Berga SL, Braunstein GD, et al. Hypoestrogenemia of hypothalamic origin and coronary artery disease in premenopausal women: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(3):413–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.••
    Boardman HM, Hartley L, Eisinga A, Main C, Roqué i FM, Bonfill CX, et al. Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3, CD002229. Recent systematic review on use of hormonal therapy in post-menopausal women.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schierbeck LL, Rejnmark L, Tofteng CL, Stilgren L, Eiken P, Mosekilde L, et al. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular events in recently postmenopausal women: randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;345, e6409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    ACOG Committee Opinion No. 565: hormone therapy and heart disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(6):1407–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Schull MJ, Redelmeier DA. Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1797–803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9677):1773–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manzi S, Meilahn EN, Rairie JE, Conte CG, Medsger TA, Jansen-McWilliams L, et al. Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(5):408–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zeller CB, Appenzeller S. Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of traditional and lupus related risk factors. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008;4(2):116–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, Saab PG, Kubzansky L. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(5):637–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Kaplan J. Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation. 1999;99(16):2192–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roeters van Lennep JE, Westerveld HT, Erkelens DW, van der Wall EE. Risk factors for coronary heart disease: implications of gender. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53(3):538–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bunker SJ, Colquhoun DM, Esler MD, Hickie IB, Hunt D, Jelinek VM, et al. "Stress" and coronary heart disease: psychosocial risk factors. Med J Aust. 2003;178(6):272–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brezinka V, Kittel F. Psychosocial factors of coronary heart disease in women: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(10):1351–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eaker ED. Psychosocial factors in the epidemiology of coronary heart disease in women. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 1989;12(1):167–73.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Eaker ED, Sullivan LM, Kelly-Hayes M, D'Agostino RB, Benjamin EJ. Does job strain increase the risk for coronary heart disease or death in men and women? The Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(10):950–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Orth-Gomér K, Wamala SP, Horsten M, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Schneiderman N, Mittleman MA. Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease: the Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. JAMA. 2000;284(23):3008–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Young LE, Cunningham SL, Buist DS. Lone mothers are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease compared with partnered mothers. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III). Health Care Women Int. 2005;26(7):604–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hemingway H, McCallum A, Shipley M, Manderbacka K, Martikainen P, Keskimäki I. Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA. 2006;295(12):1404–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Daly C, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, et al. Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina. Circulation. 2006;113(4):490–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    McSweeney JC, Cody M, O'Sullivan P, Elberson K, Moser DK, Garvin BJ. Women's early warning symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003;108(21):2619–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, Olson M, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3 Suppl):S21–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    DeVon HA, Ryan CJ, Ochs AL, Shapiro M. Symptoms across the continuum of acute coronary syndromes: differences between women and men. Am J Crit Care. 2008;17(1):14–24. quiz 5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN. Angina with "normal" coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. JAMA. 2005;293(4):477–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gulati M, Cooper-DeHoff RM, McClure C, Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Handberg EM, et al. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):843–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Healy B. The Yentl syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(4):274–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87(4):1354–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kothawade K, Bairey Merz CN. Microvascular coronary dysfunction in women: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2011;36(8):291–318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary: a Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012;126(25):3097–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, Bittl JA, Byrne JG, Fletcher BJ, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2014;130(19):1749–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.••
    Ferrari R, Abergel H, Ford I, Fox KM, Greenlaw N, Steg PG, et al. Gender- and age-related differences in clinical presentation and management of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(6):2938–43. Prospective, longitudinal observational survey of patients treated worldwide with stable CAD. Highlights important gender related differences in presentation and management.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.••
    Johansen ME, Hefner JL, Foraker RE. Antiplatelet and Statin Use in US Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Categorized by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, 2003 to 2012. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(11):1507–12. Highlights differences in statin use in men and women.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang Z, Fang J, Gillespie C, Wang G, Hong Y, Yoon PW. Age-specific gender differences in in-hospital mortality by type of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(8):1097–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.••
    Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA, Grines CL, Krumholz HM, Johnson MN, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in women: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016. Recent statement by AHA on acute MI in women. Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Brass LM, Lichtman JH, Wang Y, Gurwitz JH, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with thrombolytic therapy for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1802–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Glaser R, Selzer F, Jacobs AK, Laskey WK, Kelsey SF, Holper EM, et al. Effect of gender on prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina pectoris and acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(11):1446–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    O'Donoghue M, Boden WE, Braunwald E, Cannon CP, Clayton TC, de Winter RJ, et al. Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(1):71–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ, White H, Théroux P, Van de Werf F, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9302):189–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Blomkalns AL, Chen AY, Hochman JS, Peterson ED, Trynosky K, Diercks DB, et al. Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(6):832–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    D'Onofrio G, Safdar B, Lichtman JH, Strait KM, Dreyer RP, Geda M, et al. Sex differences in reperfusion in young patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the VIRGO study. Circulation. 2015;131(15):1324–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Abramson JL, Veledar E, Weintraub WS, Vaccarino V. Association between gender and In-Hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention according to age. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(8):968–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Argulian E, Patel AD, Abramson JL, Kulkarni A, Champney K, Palmer S, et al. Gender differences in short-term cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(1):48–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.•
    Alam M, Bandeali SJ, Kayani WT, Ahmad W, Shahzad SA, Jneid H, et al. Comparison by meta-analysis of mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in women versus men. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(3):309–17. Study showing difference in mortality after CABG in men and women.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Emmert MY, Salzberg SP, Seifert B, Schurr UP, Odavic D, Reuthebuch O, et al. Despite modern off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting women fare worse than men. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10(5):737–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations