Sex-Specific Disparities in Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease
- 780 Downloads
In the past two decades, focused research on women at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has helped to clarify our understanding of some of the sex-specific factors that are important in the prevention and early detection of coronary atherosclerosis with a resultant 30 % decrease in the number of women dying from CVD. In spite of these advances, CVD, specifically, ischemic heart disease due to coronary atherosclerosis is the leading cause of cardiovascular death of women in the USA. The 2010 landmark Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, “Women’s Health Research—Progress, Pitfalls and Promise,” highlighted the fact that although major progress had been made in reducing cardiovascular mortality in women, there were disparities in disease burden among subgroups of women, particularly those women who are socially disadvantaged because of race, ethnicity, income level, and educational attainment . The IOM recommended targeted research on these subpopulations of women with the highest risk and burden of disease. Causes of disparities are multifactorial and are related to differences in risk factor prevalence, access to care, use of evidence-based guidelines, and social and environmental factors. In this article, we review a few of the contributing factors to the disparities in ischemic heart disease in women with a focus on the subgroups of women of Black, Latino, and South Asian descent who are at high risk for morbidity and mortality from CVD.
KeywordsCardiovascular disease in women Gender-based approach to heart disease Disparities in healthcare
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
SE Rosen, S Henry, R Bond, C Pearte, and JH Mieres all declare no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Women’s Health Research: progress, pitfalls and promise. Institute of Medicine. Report Brief. September 23, 2010.Google Scholar
- 2.Mozafferin D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS et al. AHA statistical update: heart disease and stroke statistics- 2015 update. A report from American Heart Association. Circulation 2014 Dec 17: e1-e11.Google Scholar
- 5.••Mieres JH, Gulati M, Bairey Merz N, American Heart Association Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected ischemic heart disease: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;130:350–79. This updated guideline publication includes an expanded approach to noninvasive testing highlighting new data and new techniques as well as an understanding that ischemic heart disease in women is a heterogeneous condition including both traditional obstructive coronary artery disease as well as those with other etiologies for IHD. The importance of shared decision making is also an important aspect of this publication. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wild RA, Carmina E, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dokras A, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular risk and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome: a consensus statement by the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (AE-PCOS). Soc J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2038–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.•Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women – update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(11):1243–62. The first gender-specific guidelines for the prevention of heart disease were published in 1999, and this update includes important new flow diagrams for prevention and a new classification of CVD risk in women and also includes a discussion on disparities, cost-effectiveness, and patient education. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Ahmed R, Dunford J, Mehran R, Robson S, Kunadian V, Pre-eclampsia and future cardiovascular risk among women. JACC 2014. Vol. 63.Google Scholar
- 38.Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123: e18–e209.Google Scholar
- 43.Pedrosa RP, Barros IMLm, Costa LOBF, et al. OSA Is common and independently associated with hypertension and increased arterial stiffness in consecutive perimenopausal women, 146#1 CHEST July 2014.Google Scholar
- 44.Women’s Health Research: progress, pitfalls and promise. Institute of Medicine, Drager LF, Togeiro SM, Polotsky VY, Lorenzi-Filho G. Report Brief. September 23, 2010. obstructive sleep apnea: a cardiometabolic risk in obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(7):569–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Campos-Rodriguez F, Martinez-Garcia MA, Almeida-Gonzalez CV, et al. Role of sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy in the incidence of stroke or coronary heart disease in women. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Volume 189 Number 12 | June 15 2014,Google Scholar
- 47.Prather AA, Epel ES, Cohen BE, Neylan TC, Whooley MA. Gender differences in the prospective associations of self-reported sleep quality with biomarkers of systemic inflammation and coagulation: findings from the Heart and Soul Study. J Psychiatr Res 2013; 47(9): 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.004.
- 48.Miller MA, Ahuja M, Cappuccio FP. Sleep and pregnancy, sleep deprivation, sleep disturbed breathing and sleep disorders in pregnancy. Sleep, 2009: pages 1–14.Google Scholar
- 51.Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Surveillance (ARIC): 2005–2010 and Cardiovascular Health Study.Google Scholar
- 57.Gillum RF. Cardiovascular disease in the United States: an epidemiologic overview. In: Saunders E, Brest A, editors. Cardiovascular diseases in blacks. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1991.Google Scholar
- 65.Akhter N, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Piana RN, Kao J, Shroff A. Gender differences among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). Am Heart J. 2009;157(1):141–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 68.Shaw LJ, Shaw RE, Merz CN, Brindis RG, Klein LW, Nallamothu B, et al. Impact of ethnicity and gender differences on angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence and in-hospital mortality in the American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. 2008;117:1787–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 69.Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, Olson M, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(suppl):S21–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 71.Shaw LJ, Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(suppl):S4–S20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, Budoff MJ, Flamm SD, Hundley WG, et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2005;111:682–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76.Murthy VL, Di Carli MF. Noon-invasive quantification of coronary vascular dysfunction for diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease. Jnucl Cardiol. 2012;1060.Google Scholar
- 84.Gulati M, Cooper-DeHoff RM, McClure C, et al. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:843–50.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 86.Chen JW, Hsu NW, Wu TC, Lin SJ, Chang MS. Long-term angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition reduces plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine and improves endothelial nitric oxide bioavailability and coronary microvascular function in patients with syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:974–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 88.Danao_glu Z, Kültürsay H, Kayikçio_glu M, Can L, Payzin S. Effect of statin therapy added to ACE-inhibitors on blood pressure control and endothelial functions in normolipidemic hypertensive patients. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2003;3:331–7.Google Scholar