Advertisement

The “New Deadly Quartet” for Cardiovascular Disease in the 21st Century: Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Inflammation and Climate Change: How Does Statin Therapy Fit into this Equation?

  • Michael Clearfield
  • Melissa Pearce
  • Yasmin Nibbe
  • David Crotty
  • Alesia Wagner
Statin Drugs (MB Clearfield, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Statin Drugs

Abstract

Despite population-based improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, such as blood pressure, cholesterol and smoking, cardiovascular disease still remains the number-one cause of mortality in the United States. In 1989, Kaplan coined the term “Deadly Quartet” to represent a combination of risk factors that included upper body obesity, glucose intolerance, hypertriglyceridemia and hypertension [Kaplan in Arch Int Med 7:1514–1520, 1989]. In 2002, the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP III) essentially added low HDL-C criteria and renamed this the “metabolic syndrome.” [The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) in JAMA 285:2486–2497, 2001] However, often forgotten was that a pro-inflammatory state and pro-thrombotic state were also considered components of the syndrome, albeit the panel did not find enough evidence at the time to recommend routine screening for these risk factors [The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) in JAMA 285:2486–2497, 2001]. Now over a decade later, it may be time to reconsider this deadly quartet by reevaluating the roles of obesity and subclinical inflammation as they relate to the metabolic syndrome. To complete this new quartet, the addition of increased exposure to elevated levels of particulate matter in the atmosphere may help elucidate why this cardiovascular pandemic continues, despite our concerted efforts. In this article, we will summarize the evidence, focusing on how statin therapy may further impact this new version of the “deadly quartet”.

Keywords

Metabolic syndrome/obesity Subclinical inflammation Air pollution/climate change Statin/pharmacology Prevention/cardiovascular risk 

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Michael Clearfield is a consultant to, received honoraria from, and had travel/accommodations expenses covered or reimbursed by Astra Zeneca and Daiichi Sankyo.

Melissa Pearce declares no conflict of interest.

Yasmin Nibbe declares no conflict of interest.

David Crotty declares no conflict of interest.

Alesia Wagner declares no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Kaplan N. The deadly quartet: Upper body obesity, glucose intolerance, hypertriglyceridemia and hypertension. Arch Int Med. 1989;7:1514–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Expert Panel of Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (ATP III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young F, Capewell S, Ford E, et al. Coronary mortality declines in the US between 1980 and 2000. Quantifying the contributions from primary and secondary prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:228–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koh HK. A 2020 vision for healthy people. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1653–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoyert DL, Xu J. Deaths: Preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61(6):1–52.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kones R. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integration of new data, evolving views, revised goals and role of rosuvastatin in management. A comprehensive survey. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2011;5:325–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Current cigarette smoking among adults –United States 2011. Morbidity and Monthly Weekly Report (MMWR) 2012;61:889–894.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoon SS, Burt V, Louis T, et al. Hypertension among adults in United States. National Center Health Statistics Data Brief 2012 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db107.hm
  9. 9.
    CDC. Vital signs: prevalence, treatment and control of LDL-C. (/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6004a5.ht,?s cid = mm6004a5 w) (MMWR) 2011;60Z(4):109–114.\Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldfine AB. Statins: Is it really time to reassess benefits and risks? N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1752–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minder CM, Blaha MJ, Horne A, et al. Evidence based use of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Med. 2012;125(5):440–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rehfield P, Kopes-Kerr C, Clearfield M. The evolution or revolution of statin therapy in primary prevention: Where do we go from here? Curr Atheroslcer Rep. 2013;15:298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lustig RH, Schmidt LA, Brindis CD. The toxic truth about sugar. Nature. 2012;482:27–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McLaughlin T, Abbasi F, Cheal A, et al. Use of metabolic markers to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:802–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kip KE, Marroquin OC, Kelley DE, et al. Clinical importance of obesity versus metabolic syndrome in cardiovascular risk in women. A report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evalaution (WISE). Circulation. 2004;109:706–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wajchenberg BL. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:697–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, et al. The metabolic syndrome.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alexander CM, Landsman P, Teutsch S, et al. NCEP defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 years and older. Diabetes. 2003;52:1210–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khan U, Wang D, Thurston R, et al. Burden of subclinical cardiovascular disease in “metabolically benign” and “at risk” overweight and obese women. The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Atherosclerosis. 2011;217:179–86.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    •• Ortega FB, Lee D, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. The intriguing metabolically healthy but obese phenotype: cardiovascular prognosis and role of fitness. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:389–99. This article showed that once fitness is accounted for, metabolically healthy but obese individuals appear to have a relatively benign condition.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iacobellis G, Ribaudo MC, Zappaterreno A, et al. Small, dense-LDL and CRP in obese subjects with and without other criteria for the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Lipid. 2007;1:599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miller M, Zhan M, Havas S. High attributable risk of elevated CRP level to conventional coronary heart disease risk factors: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Int Med. 2005;165(18):2063–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bray G, Fintel DJ, Clearfield MB, et al. Overweight and Obesity: the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic risk. Clin Cornerstone. 2009;9(4):30–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    St-Onge MP, Janssen I, Heymsfield SB. Metabolic syndrome in normal-weight Americans. New definition of the metabolically obese, normal-weight individual. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2222–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cohen JD, Cziraky MJ, Cai Q, et al. 30-year trends in serum lipids among United States adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys II, III and 1999–2006. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:969–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca F, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated CRP. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Blaha MJ, Rivera JJ, Budoff MJ, et al. Association between obesity, hsCRP > 2 mg/L, and subclinical atherosclerosis: Implications of JUPITER from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(6):1430–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomized trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1670–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT). The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomized trials. Lancet. 2012;380:581–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Kokkinos P, Faselis C, Myers J, et al. Interactive effects of fitness and statin treatment on mortality risk in veterans with dyslipidemia: a cohort study. Lancet. 2013;381:394–9. This analysis demonstrated that statins and fitness were independently associated with lower cardiovascular mortality.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    World Health Organization. World Health Report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization 2002.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    • Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA, et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease. An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:2331–78. Good synopsis of the association between particulate matter and CVD.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lepeule J, Laden F, Dockery D, et al. Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: An extended follow-up of the Harvard six cities study from 1974 to 2009. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:965–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bauer M, Mobeus S, Mohlenkamp S, et al. Residential exposure to urban air pollution is associated with coronary atherosclerosis: results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1803–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaufman J. Does air pollution accelerate progression of atherosclerosis? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1809–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hyun Y, Koh S, Chae J, et al. Atherogenicity of LDL and unfavorable adipokine profile in metabolically obese, normal weight women. Obesity. 2008;16:784–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weiss R. Fat distribution and storage: how much, where and how? Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157:S39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li Y. Rittenhouse-Olson, Schneider W et al. Effects of particulate matter air pollution on CRP: a review of epidemiologic studies. Rev Environ Health. 2012;27:133–49.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Egger G, Dixon J. Should obesity be the main game? Or do we need an environmental makeover to combat the inflammatory and chronic disease epidemics? Obes Rev. 2009;10:237–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    •• Gold DR, Mittleman MA. New insights into pollution and the cardiovascular system 2010–2012. Circulation. 2013;127:1903–13. Recent update on the association between particulate matter and CVD.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sacks J, Stanek L, Luben T, et al. Particulate matter induced health effects: who is susceptible? Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:454–66.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takano H, Yanagisawa R, Inoue K, et al. Nitrogen dioxide air pollution near ambient levels is an atherogenic risk primarily in obese subjects: a brief communication. Exp Biol Med. 2004;229:361–4.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Miller J, Siscovick D, Sheppard L, et al. Long term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:447–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zeka A, Sullivan J, Vokanos P, et al. Inflammatory markers and particulate air pollution: characterizing the pathway to disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:13471354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Diez R, Auchincloss A, Franklin T, et al. Long term exposure to ambient particulate matter and prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in the MESA Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:667–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bennett W, Zeman K. Effect of body size on breathing pattern and fine particulate deposition in children. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97:821–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hickling S, Hung J, Knuiman M, et al. Are the associations between diet and CRP independent of obesity? Prev Med. 2008;47:71–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Girman C, Rhodes T, Mercuri M, et al. The metabolic syndrome and risk of major coronary events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and the Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:136–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Clearfield M, Downs J, Lee M, et al. Implications from the Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study for the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1674–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sever P, Poulter N, Chang C, et al. Evaluation of CRP prior to and on-treatment as a predictor of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:486–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wald N, Law M. Statins for people at low risk for cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2012;380:1818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Law M, Wald N, Rudnicka A. Quantifying effects of statins on LDL-C, ischemic heart disease and stroke. Brit Med J. 2003;326:1423–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wong N, Chuang J, Wong K, et al. Residual dyslipidemia among United States adults treated with lipid modifying therapy (Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2010). Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:373–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Onat A, Ceyhan K, Basar O, et al. Metabolic syndrome: major impact on coronary risk in a population with low cholesterol levels-a prospective and cross sectional evaluation. Atherosclerosis. 2002;165:285–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cole T, Contois J, Csako G, et al. Association of apolipoprotein B and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy derived LDL particle number with outcomes in 25 clinical studies: assessment of the AACC lipoprotein and vascular diseases division working group on best practices. Clin Chem. 2013;59:752–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Otvos J, Mora S, Shalaurova I, et al. Clinical implications of discordance between LDL-C and particle number. J Clin Lipid. 2011;5:105113.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cromwell J, Otvos J, Keyes M, et al. LDL particle number and risk of future cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Offspring study-implications for LDL management. J Clin Lipid. 2007;1:583–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    • Sniderman A, Thanassoulis G, Couture P, et al. Is lower and lower better and better? A re-evaluation of the evidence from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialsists’ Collaboration meta-analysis for LDL-C lowering. J Clin Lipid. 2012;6:303–9. A different perspective, using the large CTT database with apo B to predict CV risk when statins lower LDL-C < 80 mg./dl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Malave H, Castro M, Burkle J, et al. Evaluation of low density particle number distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with LDL-C < 50 mg/dl and Non-HDL-C < 80. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:662–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Faraj M, Lavole ME, Messier L, et al. Reduction in serum apoB is associated with reduced inflammation and insulin resistance in post-menopausal women: a MONET study. Atherosclerosis. 2010;211:682–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kathiresan S, Otvos J, Sullivan L, et al. Increased small LDL particle number: A prominent feature fo the Metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2006;113:20–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sniderman A. Differential response of cholesterol and particle measures of atherogenic lipoproteins to LDL lowering therapy: implications for clinical practice. J Clin Lipid. 2008;2:36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sniderman A, Willaims K, Contois J, et al. A meta-analysis of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B as markers of cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcome. 2011;5:337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yang Q, Cogswell M, Flanders D, et al. Trends in cardiovascular health metrics associations with all-cause mortality among US adults. JAMA. 2012;307:1273–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    O’Keefe J, Cordain L, Harris W, et al. Optimal LDL is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is better and physiologically normal. JACC. 2004;43:2142–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jacobson T, Griffiths G, Varas C, et al. Impact of evidence based “clinical judgement” on the number of American adults requiring lipid lowering therapy based on updated NHANES III data. JAMA. 2000;160:1361–9.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cohen J, Czuraky N, Cai Q, et al. 30 year trends in serum lipids among United States adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys II, III and 1999–2006. AJC. 2010;106:969–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Munter P, Levitan E, Brown T, et al. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of high LDL-C among US Adults from 1999–2000 through 2009–2010. Am J Cardiol 2013.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Goldfine A, Sanjay K, Hiatt W. Fibrates in the treatment of dyslipidemia: time for reassessment. NEJM. 2011;365:481–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Onat J, Can G, Kaya H, et al. Atherogenic index of plasma (log10 triglyceride/HDL-C) predicts high blood pressure, diabetes, vascular events. Clin Lipid. 2010;4:89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Carey V, Bishop L, Harshfield B, et al. Contribution of high plasma triglyceride and low HDL-C to residual risk of coronary heart disease after establishment of LDL-C control. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:757–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    • Bayturan J, Kapadia S, Nicholls S, et al. Clinical predictors of plaque progression despite very low levels of LDL-C. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2736–42. This study suggests increased LDL particle number played a role in the further progression of atherosclerosis despite statin therapy lowering LDL-C < 70 mg/dl.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Clearfield M. Another inconvenient truth: Combining the risks from obesity and metabolic syndrome with global warming. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2008;10:273–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Quan C, Sun Q, Lippman M, et al. Comparative effects of inhaled diesel exhaust and ambient fine particles on inflammation, atherosclerosis and vascular dysfunction. Inhal Toxicol. 2010;22:738–53.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    James W, Caterson I, Coutinho W, et al. Effect of sibutramine on cardiovascular outcomes in overweight and obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:905–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, et al. The metabolic syndrome: Time for critical appraisal: the study of Diabetes. Diabet Care. 2005;28:2289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cromwell W, Otvos J, Keyes M, et al. LDL particle number and risk of future CVD in the Framingham Offspring Study Implications for LDL management. J Clin Lipid. 2007;1:583–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Yousef O, Mohanty B, Martin S, et al. High sensitivity CRP and Cardiovascular Disease: a resolute belief or an elusive link? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Everett BM, Pradham AD, Solomon DH, et al. Rationale and design of the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial: A test of the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis. Am Heart J. 2013;166:199–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Genest J, McPherson R, Frohlich J, et al. 2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. Can J Cardiol. 2009;25:567–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Reiner Z, Catapano A, De Backer G, et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemis: The task force for the management of dyslipidemias of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1769–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Martin S, Metkus T, Horne A, et al. Waiting for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel IV Guidelines, and in the meantime, some challenges and recommendations. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:307–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cromwell W, Dayspring T. Lipid and lipoprotein disorders: Current Clinical Solutions. Catonsville: International Guideline Center; 2012.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    American Lung Association State of the Air 2011 http//:www.stateoftheair.org http//:www.lungusa.org.
  85. 85.
    Murray C, Lopez A. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:448–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Clearfield
    • 1
  • Melissa Pearce
    • 1
  • Yasmin Nibbe
    • 1
  • David Crotty
    • 1
  • Alesia Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Touro University College of Osteopathic MedicineVallejoUSA

Personalised recommendations