Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Modern Theories of Etiology
- 805 Downloads
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a classic failure of the immune system with a life-threatening attack upon a critical self-component. The active phase of the disease is short, concordant with the latency of a primary adaptive immune response. Triggers for GBS include infection and (rarely) vaccination; cross-reactivity between infectious and neural epitopes has been well demonstrated, particularly for Campylobacter jejuni and motor axonal forms of GBS in which non-protein gangliosides are antigenic. Most people are probably exposed to a GBS trigger, but only rarely does the disease develop. We propose that GBS illustrates competing determinants of the immune system’s decision about whether to mount a response, and that in unlucky affected individuals, co-presentation of cross-reactive antigens with danger signals activating pattern-recognition receptors overcomes normal self-recognition such that a primary response is initiated that attacks the nerve. Then, in most cases of GBS, the response rapidly turns off, and second attacks rarely occur. This suggests active restoration of tolerance, and specific privileged site attributes of nerve and declining danger signals as the trigger wanes may contribute to this restoration. Standard immunosuppression has not been effective in GBS. We suggest this is because immune tolerance is already being restored by the time such therapies are initiated. This in turn suggests that improvements in GBS outcomes are likely to come from better protection of the nerve cells under attack while normal resumption of tolerance is permitted to proceed rather than exploring more aggressive immunosuppressive approaches.
KeywordsGuillain-Barré syndrome Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy Acute motor axonal neuropathy Immune pathogenesis Autoimmune disease
Dr. Blum has been funded by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Research Scholarship.
Dr. Reddel has received honoraria, sponsorship, therapeutic trial payments, and/or grant funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Muscular Dystrophy Association of the United States, and the Muscular Dystrophy Association of New South Wales. He also wishes to acknowledge helpful discussions with John Pollard, Judy Spies, and Hugh Willison.
Dr. Reddel has received honoraria, sponsorship, therapeutic trial payments, and/or grant funding from Bayer Schering Pharma and Genzyme Corp. Drs. Hardy, Blum, and McCombe reported no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 8.2009 H1N1 flu. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu.
- 46.• Kuitwaard K, van Koningsveld R, Ruts L, et al: Recurrent Guillain Barre syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2009, 80:56–59. This article confirmed the low rate of recurrent GBS and demonstrated that the few patients who do have recurrences have other features of autoimmunity, and that the standard on-off case does not. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.• Steiner I, Rosenberg G, Wirguin I: Transient immunosuppression: a bridge between infection and the atypical autoimmunity of Guillain-Barre syndrome? Clin Exp Immunol 2010. This article presents an interesting related hypothesis that suggests more of a role for transient immunosuppression as an initiating feature but also deals well with the reasons why GBS is not a typical autoimmune disease. Google Scholar