Current Allergy and Asthma Reports

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 357–364 | Cite as

Microarrayed Allergen Molecules for the Diagnosis of Allergic Diseases

  • Adriano Mari
  • Claudia Alessandri
  • Maria Livia Bernardi
  • Rosetta Ferrara
  • Enrico Scala
  • Danila Zennaro


IgE-mediated allergic diseases are among the most prevalent diseases worldwide. The use of extracts in the skin test and the additional use of IgE testing still represent the current basis for the diagnostic work-up. During the past 30 years, knowledge of the molecular structure of allergens has increased dramatically, and the characterization and production of allergenic molecules, as natural purified compounds or recombinant products, is allowing us to approach the allergy diagnostic work-up differently. Much of this is based on the adoption of microtechnology since the first release of a biochip for IgE detection. Its use has prompted the development of new concepts linked to the diagnosis of allergic diseases. This review describes the background of allergy diagnosis and the tools currently used for specific IgE detection. It gives insight into the most recent advancement in the field of biotechnology leading to allergenic molecule availability, microtechnology leading to the routine use of protein biochips for IgE detection, and how they should be combined with information technology.


Allergy Diagnosis Molecules Extracts Biochip IgE 



No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance•• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, et al.: Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004, 113:832–836.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Knudsen TB, Thomsen SF, Nolte H, Backer V: A population-based clinical study of allergic and non-allergic asthma. J Asthma 2009, 46:91–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    • Cox L, Williams B, Sicherer S, et al.: Pearls and pitfalls of allergy diagnostic testing: report from the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Specific IgE Test Task Force. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008, 101:580–592. This is a revision of the currently used diagnostic tools and their indications and interpretations.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Matsson PNJ, Hamilton RG, Esch RE, et al.: Analytical Performance Characteristics and Clinical Utility of Immunological Assays for Human Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Antibodies and Defined Allergen Specificities; Approved Guideline, edn 2. CLSI Document I/LA20-A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2009. This is the most comprehensive and up-to-date document on IVDs available for allergic diseases. This second edition of the CLSI guidelines includes information on allergenic molecules and microtechnologies for the first time.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nolte H, DuBuske LM: Performance characteristics of a new automated enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Summary of the probability outcomes comparing results of allergen skin testing to results obtained with the HYTEC system and CAP system. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997, 79:27–34.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kam KL, Hsieh KH: Comparison of three in vitro assays for serum IgE with skin testing in asthmatic children. Ann Allergy 1994, 73:329–336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciardiello MA, Giangrieco I, Tuppo L, et al.: Influence of the natural ripening stage, cold storage, and ethylene treatment on the protein and IgE-binding profiles of green and gold kiwi fruit extracts. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57:1565–1571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Constantin C, Touraev A, Heberle-Bors E, et al.: Detection of antigens reactive to IgE and IgA during wheat seed maturation and in different wheat cultivars. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2009, 149:181–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hildebrandt S, Steinhart H, Paschke A: Comparison of different extraction solutions for the analysis of allergens in hen’s egg. Food Chem 2008, 108:1088–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Larenas-Linnemann D, Cox LS: European allergen extract units and potency: review of available information. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008, 100:137–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    • Lorenz AR, Luttkopf D, May S, et al.: The principle of homologous groups in regulatory affairs of allergen products—a proposal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2009, 148:1–17. This article introduces the use of allergenic molecules for allergenic extract standardization.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mari A: Multiple pollen sensitization: a molecular approach to the diagnosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001, 125:57–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tinghino R, Twardosz A, Barletta B, et al.: Molecular, structural, and immunologic relationships between different families of recombinant calcium-binding pollen allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002, 109:314–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferreira F, Hawranek T, Gruber P, et al.: Allergic cross-reactivity: from gene to the clinic. Allergy 2004, 59:243–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Crameri R: Recombinant allergens for skin testing. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001, 125:96–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Asero R, Monsalve R, Barber D: Profilin sensitization detected in the office by skin prick test: a study of prevalence and clinical relevance of profilin as a plant food allergen. Clin Exp Allergy 2008, 38:1033–1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    • Asero R, Jimeno L, Barber D: Component-resolved diagnosis of plant food allergy by SPT. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 40:115–121. This article discusses approaching molecule-based diagnosis using the skin test.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mari A, Scala E, D’Ambrosio C, et al.: Latex allergy within a cohort of not-at-risk subjects with respiratory symptoms: prevalence of latex sensitization and assessment of diagnostic tools. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007, 143:135–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lidholm A, Ballmer-Weber BK, Mari A, Vieths S: Component-resolved diagnostics in food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2006, 6:234–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heinzerling L, Frew AJ, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al.: Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe—a survey from the GA2LEN network. Allergy 2005, 60:1287–1300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    • Lee S, Lim HS, Park J, Kim HS: A new automated multiple allergen simultaneous test-chemiluminescent assay (MAST-CLA) using an AP720S analyzer. Clin Chim Acta 2009, 402:182–188. This is an example of multiplex IgE testing using extracts.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO: Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995, 270:467–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schulze A, Downward J: Analysis of gene expression by microarrays: cell biologist’s gold mine or minefield? J Cell Sci 2000, 113:4151–4156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    MacBeath G, Schreiber SL: Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 2000, 289:1760–1763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hiller R, Laffer S, Harwanegg C, et al.: Microarrayed allergen molecules: diagnostic gatekeepers for allergy treatment. FASEB J 2002, 16:414–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jahn-Schmid B, Harwanegg C, Hiller R, et al.: Allergen microarray: comparison of microarray using recombinant allergens with conventional diagnostic methods to detect allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E. Clin Exp Allergy 2003, 33:1443–1449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wohrl S, Vigl K, Zehetmayer S, et al.: The performance of a component-based allergen-microarray in clinical practice. Allergy 2006, 61:633–639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ott H, Schroder CM, Stanzel S, et al.: Microarray-based IgE detection in capillary blood samples of patients with atopy. Allergy 2006, 61:1146–1147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harwanegg C, Hutter S, Hiller R: Allergen microarrays for the diagnosis of specific IgE against components of cow’s milk and hen’s egg in a multiplex biochip-based immunoassay. Methods Mol Biol 2007, 385:145–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Untersmayr E, Lukschal A, Hemmer W, et al.: Exercise with latex sport bands represents a risk for latex allergic patients. Immunol Lett 2008, 115:98–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Musu T, Rabillon J, Pelletier C, et al.: Simultaneous quantitation of specific IgE against 20 purified allergens in allergic patients sera by checkerboard immunoblotting (CBIB). J Clin Lab Anal 1997, 11:357–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fulton RJ, McDade RL, Smith PL, et al.: Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system. Clin Chem 1997, 43:1749–1756.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schweitzer B, Wiltshire S, Lambert J, et al.: Immunoassays with rolling circle DNA amplification: a versatile platform for ultrasensitive antigen detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:10113–10119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim TE, Park SW, Cho NY, et al.: Quantitative measurement of serum allergen-specific IgE on protein chip. Exp Mol Med 2002, 34:152–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bacarese-Hamilton T, Mezzasoma L, Ingham C, et al.: Detection of allergen-specific IgE on microarrays by use of signal amplification techniques. Clin Chem 2002, 48:1367–1370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Matsubara Y, Murakami Y, Kobayashi M, et al.: Application of on-chip cell cultures for the detection of allergic response. Biosens Bioelectron 2004, 19:741–747.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Han MK, Seo MH, Lee D, et al.: Optimization of critical factors affecting the performance of an allergen chip for the analysis of an allergen-specific human IgE in serum. Anal Sci 2007, 23:545–549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hahn YK, Jin Z, Kang JH, et al.: Magnetophoretic immunoassay of allergen-specific IgE in an enhanced magnetic field gradient. Anal Chem 2007, 79:2214–2220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Suck R, Nandy A, Weber B, et al.: Rapid method for arrayed investigation of IgE-reactivity profiles using natural and recombinant allergens. Allergy 2002, 57:821–824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fall BI, Eberlein-Konig B, Behrendt H, et al.: Microarrays for the screening of allergen-specific IgE in human serum. Anal Chem 2003, 75:556–562.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alcocer MJ, Murtagh GJ, Wilson PB, et al.: The major human structural IgE epitope of the Brazil nut allergen Ber e 1: a chimaeric and protein microarray approach. J Mol Biol 2004, 343:759–769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shreffler WG, Lencer DA, Bardina L, Sampson HA: IgE and IgG(4) epitope mapping by microarray immunoassay reveals the diversity of immune response to the peanut allergen, Ara h 2. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005, 116:893–899.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Satinover SM, Reefer AJ, Pomes A, et al.: Specific IgE and IgG antibody-binding patterns to recombinant cockroach allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005, 115:803–809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ohyama K, Omura K, Ito Y: A photo-immobilized allergen microarray for screening of allergen-specific IgE. Allergol Int 2005, 54:627–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lebrun SJ, Petchpud WN, Hui A, McLaughlin CS: Development of a sensitive, colorometric microarray assay for allergen-responsive human IgE. J Immunol Methods 2005, 300:24–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    King EM, Vailes LD, Tsay A, et al.: Simultaneous detection of total and allergen-specific IgE by using purified allergens in a fluorescent multiplex array. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007, 120:1126–1131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gaudin JC, Rabesona H, Choiset Y, et al.: Assessment of the immunoglobulin E-mediated immune response to milk-specific proteins in allergic patients using microarrays. Clin Exp Allergy 2008, 38:686–693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    •• Cerecedo I, Zamora J, Shreffler WG, et al.: Mapping of the IgE and IgG4 sequential epitopes of milk allergens with a peptide microarray-based immunoassay. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 122:589–594. This study shows advanced microtechnology applied to measurement of different immunoglobulin isotypes toward peptides to describe milk allergen epitope recognition.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Heyries KA, Loughran MG, Hoffmann D, et al.: Microfluidic biochip for chemiluminescent detection of allergen-specific antibodies. Biosens Bioelectron 2008, 23:1812–1818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gadermaier G, Wopfner N, Wallner M, et al.: Array-based profiling of ragweed and mugwort pollen allergens. Allergy 2008, 63:1543–1549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ott H, Baron JM, Heise R, et al.: Clinical usefulness of microarray-based IgE detection in children with suspected food allergy. Allergy 2008, 63:1521–1528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    • Matsumoto N, Okochi M, Matsushima M, et al.: Development of peptide arrays for detection of IgE-binding epitopes in cow’s milk allergens. J Biosci Bioeng 2009, 107:324–330. Microtechnology is used to measure IgE response to peptides identifying epitopes.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    • Cretich M, Di Carlo G, Giudici C, et al.: Detection of allergen specific immunoglobulins by microarrays coupled to microfluidics. Proteomics 2009, 9:2098–2107. This is an example of a further microtechnology, microfluidics, applied to in vitro detection of IgE.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Constantin C, Quirce S, Poorafshar M, et al.: Micro-arrayed wheat seed and grass pollen allergens for component-resolved diagnosis. Allergy 2009, 64:1030–1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    •• Scala E, Alessandri C, Bernardi ML, et al.: Cross-sectional survey on immunoglobulin E reactivity in 23 077 subjects using an allergenic molecule-based microarray detection system. Clin Exp Allergy 2010, 40:911–921. This is the first high-throughput study ever published in the allergy/immunology field based on electronically collected routine diagnostic data that were analyzed as an epidemiologic survey. Prevalence of IgE recognition, demographical data distribution, along with new clustering analysis representation were reported.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mari A: Skin test with a Timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen extract vs IgE to a Timothy extract vs IgE to rPhl p 1, rPhl p 2, nPhl p 4, rPhl p 5, rPhl p 6, rPhl p 7, rPhl p 11, and rPhl p 12: epidemiological and diagnostic data. Clin Exp Allergy 2003, 33:43–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zennaro D, Palazzo P, Pomponi D, et al.: Retrospective comparative analysis of skin test and IgE reactivity to extracts, and singleplexed or multiplexed allergenic molecules. Allergy 2007, 62:S153.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Akkerdaas JH, Wensing M, Knulst AC, et al.: How accurate and safe is the diagnosis of hazelnut allergy by means of commercial skin prick test reagents? Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2003, 132:132–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zuidmeer L, van Leeuwen WA, Kleine Budde I, et al.: Allergenicity assessment of apple cultivars: hurdles in quantifying labile fruit allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2006, 141:230–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tuppo L, Giangrieco I, Palazzo P, et al.: Kiwellin, a modular protein from green and gold kiwi fruits: evidence of in vivo and in vitro processing and IgE binding. J Agric Food Chem 2008, 56:3812–3817.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ciardiello MA, D’Avino R, Amoresano A, et al.: The peculiar structural features of kiwi fruit pectin methylesterase: amino acid sequence, oligosaccharides structure, and modeling of the interaction with its natural proteinaceous inhibitor. Proteins 2008, 71:195–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bernardi ML, Palazzo P, Tuppo L, et al.: Pectin methylesterase (Act d 7) and pectin methylesterase inhibitor (Act d 6): two new kiwi fruit allergens. Allergy 2008, 63:S585.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Deinhofer K, Sevcik H, Balic N, et al.: Microarrayed allergens for IgE profiling. Methods 2004, 32:249–254.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rona RJ, Keil T, Summers C, et al.: The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007, 120:638–646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zuidmeer L, Goldhahn K, Rona RJ, et al.: The prevalence of plant food allergies: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 121:1210–1218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Valenta R, Niederberger V: Recombinant allergens for immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007, 119:826–830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fernandez-Rivas M, Bolhaar S, Gonzalez-Mancebo E, et al.: Apple allergy across Europe: how allergen sensitization profiles determine the clinical expression of allergies to plant foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006, 118:481–488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    • Barber D, De la Torre F, Feo F, et al.: Understanding patient sensitization profiles in complex pollen areas: a molecular epidemiological study. Allergy 2008, 63:1550–1558. This was a comprehensive survey in a geographical region using singleplex allergens on a standard IVD system.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mari A, Ooievaar-de Heer P, Scala E, et al.: Evaluation by double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge of the clinical relevance of IgE antibodies against plant glycans. Allergy 2008, 63:891–896.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kleine-Tebbe J, Vogel L, Crowell DN, et al.: Severe oral allergy syndrome and anaphylactic reactions caused by a Bet v 1- related PR-10 protein in soybean, SAM22. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002, 110:797–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ballmer-Weber BK, Holzhauser T, Scibilia J, et al.: Clinical characteristics of soybean allergy in Europe: a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007, 119:1489–1496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zuidmeer L, van Ree R: Lipid transfer protein allergy: primary food allergy or pollen/food syndrome in some cases. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2007, 7:269–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Harwanegg C, Hiller R: Protein microarrays for the diagnosis of allergic diseases: state-of-the-art and future development. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005, 43:1321–1326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zennaro D, Scala E, Pomponi D, et al.: Defining IgE specificities in reported cases of IPEX syndrome by means of ISAC proteomic microarray system. Allergy 2008, 63:S41.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C, et al.: Factors responsible for differences between asymptomatic subjects and patients presenting an IgE sensitization to allergens. A GA2LEN project. Allergy 2006, 61:671–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vieths S, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K: EuroPrevall food allergen library. Mol Nutr Food Res 2008, 52(Suppl 2):S157–S158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    •• Ciardiello MA, Palazzo P, Bernardi ML, et al.: Biochemical, immunological and clinical characterization of a cross-reactive nonspecific lipid transfer protein 1 from mulberry. Allergy 2010, 65:597–605. This was a combined application of microarrayed IgE-tested allergens for patient selection plus population survey plus inhibition experiments.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    •• Gadermaier G, Harrer A, Girbl T, et al.: Isoform identification and characterization of Art v 3, the lipid-transfer protein of mugwort pollen. Mol Immunol 2009, 46:1919–1924. Microarrayed allergens were used for single-point highest inhibition achievable assay to define features of isoforms produced as recombinant allergen.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    •• Krause S, Reese G, Randow S, et al.: Lipid transfer protein (Ara h 9) as a new peanut allergen relevant for a Mediterranean allergic population. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009, 124:771e5–778.e5. A single-point highest inhibition achievable assay was used to define features of newly characterized allergen and IgE response to peanut allergen survey of a population for defining clinical relevance of allergens in causing the clinical disease.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    •• Mari A, Rasi C, Palazzo P, Scala E: Allergen databases: current status and perspectives. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2009, 9:376–383. This review examined current information technology–based tools to be used in combination with microarray-based IVDs for allergic diseases.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriano Mari
    • 1
  • Claudia Alessandri
    • 1
  • Maria Livia Bernardi
    • 1
  • Rosetta Ferrara
    • 1
  • Enrico Scala
    • 1
  • Danila Zennaro
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Molecular AllergologyIDI-IRCCSRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations