Current Allergy and Asthma Reports

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 376–383 | Cite as

Allergen databases: Current status and perspectives

  • Adriano Mari
  • Chiara Rasi
  • Paola Palazzo
  • Enrico Scala


An increasing number of studies on allergenic molecules have been published during the past 20 years, and the number of proteins reported as allergens is close to 1500 ( Collecting, organizing, and displaying data reported in the scientific literature is becoming the major commitment of Web-based databases that organize this knowledge in heterogeneous ways. This heterogeneity prevents the databases from being connected to each other, something that has been done in several other biomedical fields. This review reports on the current status of allergen databases and available tools to study the allergenicity of new compounds. An analysis of what has been done by applying bioinformatics in other medical fields is presented. Suggestions on how to create a common platform in which experimental, clinical, and epidemiologic data could be merged are offered. The model of the Allergome platform and its modules and tools (eg, InterAll, ReTiME, RefArray, and AllergomeBlaster) are used to exemplify interconnectivity and data integration.


Allergy Clin Immunol Text Mining European Food Safety Authority External Link Allergenic Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Cohen SG, King JR: Skin tests: a historic trail. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2001, 21:191–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kamble S, Bharmal M: Incremental direct expenditure of treating asthma in the United States. J Asthma 2009, 46:73–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferreira F, Hawranek T, Gruber P, et al.: Allergic cross-reactivity: from gene to the clinic. Allergy 2004, 59:243–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radauer C, Bublin M, Wagner S, et al.: Allergens are distributed into few protein families and possess a restricted number of biochemical functions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 121:847–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas K, Macintosh S, Bannon G, et al.: Scientific advancement of novel protein allergenicity evaluation: an overview of work from the HESI Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee (2000-2008). Food Chem Toxicol 2009, 47:1041–1050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li X, Zhang Y: Bioinformatics data distribution and integration via Web Services and XML. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2003, 1:299–303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Madsen CB, Hattersley S, Buck J, et al.: Approaches to risk assessment in food allergy: report from a workshop “Developing a framework for assessing the risk from allergenic foods.” Food Chem Toxicol 2009, 47:480–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miotto O, Tan TW, Brusic V: Supporting the curation of biological databases with reusable text mining. Genome Inform 2005, 16:32–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mari A, Scala E, Palazzo P, et al.: Bioinformatics applied to allergy: allergen databases, from collecting sequence information to data integration. The Allergome platform as a model. Cell Immunol 2007, 244:97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galperin MY, Cochrane GR: Nucleic Acids Research annual Database Issue and the NAR online Molecular Biology Database Collection in 2009. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D1–D4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boutet E, Lieberherr D, Tognolli M, et al.: UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. Methods Mol Biol 2007, 406:89–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanz C, Aldebert P, Althorpe N, et al.: The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:D29–D33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al.: The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:235–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    King TP, Hoffman D, Lowenstein H, et al.: Allergen nomenclature. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995, 96:5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gendel SM: Assessing the potential allergenicity of new food proteins. Food Biotechnol 1998, 12:175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al.: Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hileman RE, Silvanovich A, Goodman RE, et al.: Bioinformatic methods for allergenicity assessment using a comprehensive allergen database. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2002, 128:280–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ivanciuc O, Schein CH, Braun W: SDAP: database and computational tools for allergenic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:359–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al.: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pearson WR, Lipman DJ: Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988, 85:2444–2448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith TF, Waterman MS: Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981, 147:195–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pearson WR: Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases. Protein Sci 1995, 4:1145–1160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Silvanovich A, Nemeth MA, Song P, et al.: The value of short amino acid sequence matches for prediction of protein allergenicity. Toxicol Sci 2006, 90:252–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aalberse RC: Structural biology of allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000, 106:228–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stadler MB, Stadler BM: Allergenicity prediction by protein sequence. FASEB J 2003, 17:1141–1143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marti P, Truffer R, Stadler MB, et al.: Allergen motifs and the prediction of allergenicity. Immunol Lett 2007, 109:47–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rasi C, Palazzo P, Carabella G, Mari A: AllergomeBlaster: Auto-collecting new potential in silico allergens for the Allergome platform. Allergy 2008, 63:S400.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hiller R, Laffer S, Harwanegg C, et al.: Microarrayed allergen molecules: diagnostic gatekeepers for allergy treatment. FASEB J 2002, 16:414–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barrett T, Suzek TO, Troup DB, et al.: NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles—database and tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:D562–D566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brazma A, Parkinson H, Sarkans U, et al.: ArrayExpress—a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:68–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Loewe L: Global computing for bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2002, 3:377–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pappalardo F, Halling-Brown MD, Rapin N, et al.: ImmunoGrid, an integrative environment for large-scale simulation of the immune system for vaccine discovery, design and optimization. Brief Bioinform 2009, 10:330–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Matsson PNJ, Hamilton RG, Esch RE, et al.: Analytical Performance Characteristics and Clinical Utility of Immunological Assays for Human Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Antibodies and Defined Allergen Specificities; Approved Guideline, edn 2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Donaldson I, Martin J, de Bruijn B, et al.: PreBIND and Textomy—mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cheng D, Knox C, Young N, et al.: PolySearch: a web-based text mining system for extracting relationships between human diseases, genes, mutations, drugs and metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:W399–W405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Valarakos AG, Karkaletsis V, Alexopoulou D, et al.: Building an allergens ontology and maintaining it using machine learning techniques. Comput Biol Med 2006, 36:1155–1184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gendel SM: Allergen databases and allergen semantics. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2008 Dec 6 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Medicine Group, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriano Mari
    • 1
  • Chiara Rasi
  • Paola Palazzo
  • Enrico Scala
  1. 1.Center for Clinical and Experimental AllergologyIDI-IRCCSRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations