Dust mite allergen avoidance as a preventive and therapeutic strategy
- 52 Downloads
Asthma is a global health problem with genetic and environmental components. Indoor allergens have a major impact on asthma, and exposure in sensitized subjects can compromise lung function. A reduction in allergen exposure would seem a logical facet to treatment. Methods for reducing mite allergen levels that are effective in the laboratory may not work in the home and may not result in a clinical benefit. Six ongoing studies are investigating the effects of environmental control on the primary prevention of asthma and allergies. Although the Isle of Wight and Canadian studies provide encouraging results at age 8 and 7 years, respectively, it will be some time before a definitive public health message emerges. For secondary prevention, there is little evidence to support the use of mite-proof encasings as a single intervention in adults. In children, however, single or multifaceted interventions appear to be of some benefit.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 1.WHO: Asthma Scope and Burden. http://www.who.int/respiratory/asthma/scope/en/index.html. Accessed February 24, 2006.Google Scholar
- 25.Horak F Jr, Matthews S, Ihorst G, et al.: Effect of miteimpermeable mattress encasings and an educational package on the development of allergies in a multinational randomized, controlled birth-cohort study—24 months results of the Study of Prevention of Allergy in Children in Europe. Clin Exp Allergy 2004, 34:1220–1225. SPACE study—European primary prevention study showed differences regarding sensitization in first year but failed to detect differences in allergic symptoms at age 2 years.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Peat JK, Mihrshahi S, Kemp AS, et al.: Three-year outcomes of dietary fatty acid modification and house dust mite reduction in the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004, 114:807–813. Australian study showing benefits of mite avoidance and dietary intervention on wheeze at age 18 months—decreased sensitization among intervention group at age 3 years.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Woodcock A, Lowe LA, Murray CS, et al.: Early life environmental control: effect on symptoms, sensitization, and lung function at age 3 years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004, 170:433–439. MAAS study, a primary prevention study showing benefit on lung functions in mite sensitized 3 year old children.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Woodcock A, Forster L, Matthews E, et al.: Control of exposure to mite allergen and allergen-impermeable bed covers for adults with asthma. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:225–236. The largest double-blind, placebo controlled secondary prevention study in asthmatic adults showing no benefit on clinical outcomes.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Luczynska C, Tredwell E, Smeeton N, Burney P: A randomized controlled trial of mite allergen-impermeable bed covers in adult mite-sensitized asthmatics. Clin Exp Allergy 2003, 33:1648–1653. Secondary prevention study in adult asthmatics failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of mite avoidance on clinical symptoms.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Morgan WJ, Crain EF, Gruchalla RS, et al.: Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:1068–1080. A large, multifaceted intervention study in children from lowersocioeconomic group showing benefit of environmental interventionon clinical disease.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar