Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 311–346 | Cite as

Literacy development in successful men and women with dyslexia

  • Rosalie P. FinkEmail author
Part IV Adults With Dyslexia: Issues And Outcomes


To investigate how, when, and under what conditions individuals with dyslexia manage to develop high literacy levels, an interview and literacy assessment study was conducted with 60 highly successful men and women with dyslexia and 10 peers without dyslexia. The sample with dyslexia included a Nobel laureate, a member of the National Academy of Sciences, and leaders in a variety of fields requiring extensive reading (i.e., medicine, law, business, and the arts and sciences).

For both males and females with dyslexia, interest-driven reading was key to the development of high literacy levels. Results showed distinct groups of successful professionals with dyslexia: a compensated group and two partially compensated groups. In each group, literacy development was augmented by avid reading in a content area of passionate personal interest, along with systematic phonics instruction. Through avid reading on a specific topic, the individuals with dyslexia developed knowledge of the specialized vocabulary, typical text structures, concepts, themes, and issues of a particular field. Extensive reading about a favorite subject enhanced the background knowledge of these individuals and enabled them to gain reading practice, which in turn, fostered the development of reading fluency and increasingly sophisticated skills. Although topics and genres of personal interest varied, fascination with a subject area was a common theme among those interviewed.

In the literacy assessment, the 60 men and women with dyslexia demonstrated most of the salient characteristics of Chall’s (1983) Stage 5, the highest level of reading development. All participants comprehended sophisticated text, but some, with partially compensated dyslexia, showed continuing lags in basic, lower level “print” skills. Individuals with partially compensated dyslexia fell into two groups: one group showed specific deficits only in spelling, whereas the other group had difficulty in spelling, word recognition, and oral reading. Many, but not all, of the participants with dyslexia showed ongoing lags in reading rate. Gender differences were most apparent in topics of personal interest reading and in mentoring patterns.

The study explores how adults with dyslexia, who may continue to lack strong integration of lower level “print” skills, succeed in constructing higher order “meaning” skills. This analysis underscores the need for a balanced approach to literacy instruction that includes both “print” and “meaning” aspects. It emphasizes the need to integrate solid interest-based approaches as a centerpiece of instruction.


Word Recognition Reading Disability Reading Fluency Learn Disability Dyslexia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaron, P. G. 1997. The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research 67(4):461–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, M. J. 1996. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, K. G. 1997. Gender bias and special education referrals. Annals of Dyslexia 47:151–62.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson-Inman, L., and Horney, M. 1996/1997. Computer-based concept mapping: Enhancing literacy with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 40(4):302–6.Google Scholar
  6. Attanucci, J. 1988. In whose terms: A new perspective on self, role, and relationship. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, and J. M. Taylor, eds., Mapping the Moral Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 201–24.Google Scholar
  7. Beaman-Smith, K., and Placier, M. 1996. The interplay of gender in the careers of white female and male senior professors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Memphis: TN.Google Scholar
  8. Blalock, J. W. 1981. Persistent problems and concerns of young adults with learning disabilities. In W. M. Cruickshank and A. A. Silver, eds., Bridges to Tomorrow: The Best of ACDL. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 35–55.Google Scholar
  9. Bowers, P. G., and Wolf, M. 1993. A “double deficit” hypothesis for developmental reading disorders. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development. New Orleans: LA.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, J. I., Fischco, V. V., and Hanna, G. 1993. Nelson-Denny Reading Test, Form H. Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar
  11. Bruck, M. 1990. Word recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology 26(3):439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chall, J. S. 1983. Stages of Reading Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Chall, J. S. 1994. Patterns of adult reading. Learning Disabilities 5(1):29–33.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, A. R. 1983. Programming for teachers of dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia 33:221–33.Google Scholar
  15. Decker, S. N., Vogler, G. P., and DeFries, J. C. 1989. Validity of self-reported reading disability by parents of reading disabled and control children. Reading and Writing 1(4):327–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feldman, E., Levin, B. E., Lubs, H., Rabin, M., Lubs, M. L., Jallad, B., and Kushch, A. 1993. Adult familial dyslexia: A retrospective developmental and psychosocial profile. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 5:195–99.Google Scholar
  17. Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., and Wood, F. B. 1990. Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain and Language 39:485–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fink, R. P. 1997. Successful dyslexics: A constructivist study of passionate interest reading. In C. Weaver, ed., Reconsidering a Balanced Approach to Reading. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English, 387–408Google Scholar
  19. Fink, R. P. 1995/1996. Successful dyslexics: A constructivist study of passionate interest reading. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 39(4):268–80.Google Scholar
  20. Fink, R. P. 1993. How successful dyslexics learn to read. Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving 15(5).Google Scholar
  21. Fink, R. P. 1992. Successful dyslexics’ alternative pathways for reading: A developmental study (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International F4965.Google Scholar
  22. Finucci, J., and Childs, B. 1981. Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls? In A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, and A. Galaburda et al., eds., Sex Differences in Dyslexia. Baltimore, Maryland: The Orton Society.Google Scholar
  23. Finucci, J. M., Gottfredson, L. S., and Childs, B. 1985. A follow-up study of dyslexic boys. Annals of Dyslexia 35:117–36.Google Scholar
  24. Finucci, J. M., Whitehouse, C. C., Isaacs, S. D., and Childs, B. 1984. Derivation and validation of a quantitative definition of specific reading disability for adults. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 26(2):143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flynn, J. M., and Rahbar, M. H. 1993. The effects of age and gender on reading achievement: Implications for pediatric counseling. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 14(5):304–7.Google Scholar
  26. Fowler, A. E., and Scarborough, H. S. 1993. Should reading-disabled adults be distinguished from other adults seeking literacy instruction? A review of theory and research (Technical Report #TR93-7). Philadelphia, PA: National Center on Adult Literacy.Google Scholar
  27. Gadsden, V. (ed.). 1991. Literacy and the African-American learner. Theory into Practice 31(4):270–78.Google Scholar
  28. Gerber, P. J., Ginsberg, R., and Reiff, H. B. 1992. Identifying alterable patterns in employment success for highly successful adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:475–87.Google Scholar
  29. Gerber, P. J., and Reiff, H. B. 1992. Speaking for Themselves: Ethnographic Interviews with Adults with Learning Disabilities. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  30. Gilger, J. W. 1992. Using self-report and parental-report survey data to assess past and present academic achievement of adults and children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 13:235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gillingham, A., and Stillman, B. 1966. Remedial Training of Children with Specific Disability in Reading, Spelling, and Penmanship (7th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  33. Griesbach, G. 1993. Dyslexia: Its history, Etiology, and Treatment. (Report No. CS011300). West Bend, WI: ERIC Document Reproduction Service.Google Scholar
  34. Gross-Glenn, K., Jallad, B. J., Novoa, L., Helgren-Lempesis, V., and Lubs, H. A. 1990. Nonsense passage reading as a diagnostic aid in the study of adult familial dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2:161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knight, J. 1986. The adult dyslexic in remediation: The ABCs and much more. Churchill Forum 8:1–4.Google Scholar
  36. LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S. J. 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 6:293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ladson-Billings, G. 1994. The Dreamkeepers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Lefly, D. L. 1997. Risk status and phonological processing. Ph.D. diss., University of Denver, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  39. Lefly, D. L., and Pennington, B. F. (submitted July 1997). Reliability and validity study of the adult reading history questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  40. Lefly, D. L., and Pennington, B. F. 1991. Spelling errors and reading fluency in compensated adult dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia 41:143–62.Google Scholar
  41. Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A., and Zigmond, N. 1982. Sex and race differences in learning disabilities classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 74(6):835–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lima, C. W., and Lima, J. A. 1993. A to Zoo: Subject Access to Children’s Picture Books (4th ed.). New Providence, NJ: R. R. Bowker Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Mellard, D., and Byrne, M. 1993. Learning disabilities referrals, eligibility outcomes, and services in community colleges: A four year summary. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 16:199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer, M. S., Wood, F. B., Hart, L. A., and Felton, R. H. 1997, November. Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming within poor readers. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Dyslexia Association, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  45. Meyer, A., Pisha, B., and Rose, D. 1991. Process and Product in Writing: Computer as Enabler. In A. M. Bain, L. L. Bailet, and L. C. Moats, eds., Written Language Disorders: Theory Into Practice. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  46. Morris, G. H. 1983. Adapting a college preparatory curriculum for dyslexic adolescents: Confronting the problems of what to teach. Annals of Dyslexia 33:243–50.Google Scholar
  47. Naiden, N. February, 1976. Ratio of boys to girls among disabled readers. Reading Teacher: 439–42.Google Scholar
  48. Nass, R. 1993. Sex differences in learning abilities and disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia 43:61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orton Dyslexia Society Research Committee. 1994. Operational definition of dyslexia. Perspectives 20(5):4.Google Scholar
  50. Orton, S. T. 1937. Reading, Writing, and Speech Problems in Children. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Perfetti, C. A. 1977. Language comprehension and fast decoding: Some psycholinguistic prerequisites for skilled reading comprehension. In J. Guthrie, ed., Cognition, Curriculum, and Comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  52. Rawson, M. 1968. Developmental Language Disability: Adult Accomplishments of Dyslexic Boys. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Renninger, K. A. 1992. Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, and A. Krapp, eds., The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Rhodes, L. K., and Dudley-Marling, C. 1988. Readers and Writers with a Difference. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  55. Rose, D. H., and Meyer, A. 1996. Expanding the literacy toolbox: Why we must broaden our definition of literacy and incorporate new media in the classroom (Literacy Paper 11): Scholastic, Inc.Google Scholar
  56. Rose, D. H., and Meyer, A. 1994. The role of technology in language arts instruction. Language Arts 71(4):290–94.Google Scholar
  57. Roswell, F. G., and Chall, J. S. 1992. Diagnostic Assessments of Reading with Trial Teaching Strategies. Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar
  58. Scarborough, H. S. 1984. Continuity between childhood dyslexia and adult reading. British Journal of Psychology 75:329–48.Google Scholar
  59. Scarborough, H. S. 1989. Prediction of reading disability from familial and individual differences. Journal of Educational Psychology 81:101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schiefele, U., and Krapp, A. 1996. Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences 8(2):141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shaywitz, B., Fletcher, J., and Shaywitz, S. 1994. The conceptual framework for learning disabilities and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Canadian Journal of Special Education 9(3):1–32.Google Scholar
  62. Shaywitz, B., Fletcher, J., and Shaywitz, S. January, 1995. Defining and classifying learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Neurology 10(1):50–57.Google Scholar
  63. Shaywitz, S., Towle, V., Keese, D., and Shaywitz, B. 1990. Prevalence of dyslexia in boys and girls in an epidemiologic sample. Journal of the American Medical Association 181:143–57.Google Scholar
  64. Snowling, M., Stothard, S., and McLean, J. 1996. Graded Nonword Reading Test. Edmunds, England: Thames Valley Test Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Stanovich, K. E. 1991. Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly 26:7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stanovich, K. E. 1980. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly 16:32–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vogel, S. 1990. Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities 23(1):44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vogel, S. A., and Walsh, P. C. 1990. Gender differences in cognitive abilities of learning-disabled females and males. Annals of Dyslexia 37:142–65.Google Scholar
  69. Vogel, S. A. 1987. Issues and concerns in college LD programming. In D. J. Johnson and J. W. Blalock, eds., Adults with Learning Disabilities: Clinical Studies. Orlando: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  70. Wadsworth, S., DeFries, J., Stevenson, J., Gilger, J., and Pennington, B. 1992. Gender ratios among learning disabled children and their siblings as a function of parental impairment. Journal of Child Psychiatry 33:1229–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whitehead, F., and Maddren, W. 1974. Children’s reading interests (Schools Council Working Paper No. 52). London, England: University of Sheffield Institute of Education, Schools Council Research Project into Children’s Reading Habits.Google Scholar
  72. Wolf, M., and Bowers, P. (submitted January 1998). The “double-deficit hypothesis” for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  73. Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming-speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In B. Blachman, ed., Cognitive and Linguistic Foundations of Reading Acquisition: Implications for Intervention Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  74. Woodd, M. January 1997. Gender differences in mentoring: A biographical reflection. Educational Management and Administration 25:25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lesley CollegeCambridge

Personalised recommendations