Advertisement

Development of orthographic representations in Spanish children with dyslexia: the influence of previous semantic and phonological knowledge

  • C. Martínez-GarcíaEmail author
  • P. Suárez-Coalla
  • F. Cuetos
Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

In transparent orthographic systems, the main characteristic of developmental dyslexia is poor reading fluency. Several studies have reported that children with dyslexia have difficulties forming orthographic representations of words, which hampers good reading fluency. This study aimed at evaluating whether the semantic–phonological training prior to word reading could facilitate the formation of orthographic representations and leading an improvement in reading fluency. Twenty-four native Spanish-speaking children with developmental dyslexia carried out two different reading tasks. In one of them, participants previously received semantic and phonological information about stimuli whereas in the other task no previous information was provided. Eight different unfamiliar words (four short and four long) were used in each reading task and the reduction of the length effect across reading blocks was taken as a formation index of new orthographic representations. Results showed low accuracy, slow speed reading, and difficulties in developing orthographic representations despite of repeated reading, probably due to the instability in decoding processes. However, the previous phonological and semantic training had a facilitator effect in the formation of orthographic representations, as indicated by the decrease in the length effect.

Keywords

Developmental dyslexia Orthographic representations Phonology Reading Semantic 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Grant PSI2015-64174-P from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spanish Government.

References

  1. Alameda, J. R. & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2018a). Orthographic learning in Spanish children: Influence of previous semantic and phonological knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 42, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12254.Google Scholar
  3. Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2018b). The role of sublexical variables in reading fluency development among Spanish children. Journal of Child Language, 45, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ml.2007.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berends, I. E., & Reitsma, P. (2005). Lateral and central presentation of words with limited exposure duration as remedial training for reading disabled children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27(7), 886–896.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490919191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berends, I. E., & Reitsma, P. (2006). Remediation of fluency: Word specific or generalised training effects? Reading and Writing, 19(2), 221–234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5259-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binamé, F., Danzio, S., & Poncelet, M. (2015). Relative ease in creating detailed orthographic representations contrasted with severe difficulties to maintain them in long-term memory among dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 21(4), 361–370.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowey, J. A., & Muller, D. (2005). Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders’ silent reading: A critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(3), 203–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunsdon, R. K., Hannan, T. J., Nickels, L., & Coltheart, M. (2002). Successful treatment of sublexical reading deficits in a child with dyslexia of the mixed type. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12(3), 199–229.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010244000048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao, F., Bitan, T., Chou, T.-L., Burman, D., & Booth, J. (2006). Deficient orthographic and phonological representations in children with dyslexia revealed by brain activation patterns. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 47(10), 1041–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01684.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clements-Stephens, A. M., Materek, A. D., Eason, S. H., Scarborough, H. S., Pugh, K. R., Rimrodt, S., et al. (2012). Neural circuitry associated with two different approaches to novel word learning. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S99–S113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cuetos, F., Arribas, D. & Ramos, J.L. (2016). PROLEC-SE-R. Batería de evaluación de los Procesos Lectores en Secundaria y Bachillerato, Revisada. [Battery of reading]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
  17. Cuetos, F., Ramos, J.L. & Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC. Evaluación de los procesos de escritura. [Writing processes assessment]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
  18. Cuetos, F., Rodríguez B., Ruano E., & Arribas D. (2007). PROLEC-R. Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores, Revisada. [Battery of reading processes assessment—Revised]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
  19. Cuetos, F., & Suárez-Coalla, P. (2009). From grapheme to word in reading acquisition in Spanish. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 30(4), 583–601.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cunningham, A. E. (2006). Accounting for children’s orthographic learning while reading text: Do children self-teach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(1), 56–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cunningham, A., Perry, K., Stanovich, K., & L Share, D. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82(3), 185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00008-5.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Jong, P. F., & Share, D. L. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 55–71.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430709336634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 22–40.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duff, F. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). The role of children’s phonological and semantic knowledge in learning to read words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 504–525.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.598199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, XIX , 19(1), 5–31.Google Scholar
  27. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M., & Ziegler, J. (2003). Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87(3), 432–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00145-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayes, M., Masterson, J., & Roberts, M. J. (2004). Improvement in reading speed in an adult with developmental dyslexia of the “mixed” type. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14(3), 365–382.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010343000273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IBM Corp. Released, 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  32. Judica, A., Luca, M. D., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Training of developmental surface dyslexia improves reading performance and shortens eye fixation duration in reading. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12(3), 177–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010244000002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13).  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
  35. Kwok, R. K. W., & Ellis, A. W. (2014). Visual word learning in adults with dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 264.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kwok, R. K. W., & Ellis, A. W. (2015). Visual word learning in skilled readers of English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(2), 326–349.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.944549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kwok, R. K. W., Cuetos, F., Avdyli, R., & Ellis, A. W. (2017). Reading and lexicalization in opaque and transparent orthographies: Word naming and word learning in English and Spanish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 2105–2129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1223705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kyte, C. S., & Johnson, C. J. (2005). The role of phonological recoding in orthographic learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 166–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.003.
  39. Lenth, R. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1).  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01.
  40. Maloney, E., Risko, E. F., O’Malley, S., & Besner, D. (2009). Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: On the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 858–867.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802578385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martens, V. E. G., & De Jong, P. F. (2008). Effects of repeated reading on the length effect in word and pseudoword reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 40–54.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00360.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nation, K., Angell, P., & Castles, A. (2007). Orthographic learning via self-teaching in children learning to read English: Effects of exposure, durability, and context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(1), 71–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). Beginning readers activate semantics from sub-word orthography. Cognition, 110(2), 273–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ouellette, G., & Fraser, J. R. (2009). What exactly is a yait anyway: The role of semantics in orthographic learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(2), 239–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Reading acquisition. (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Protopapas, A. (2007). Check Vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 859–862.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rack, J., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Wightman, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children learning to read words: The direct-mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57(1), 42–71.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1994.1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramos, J.L. & Cuetos, F. (2005). PROLEC-SE. Evaluación de los procesos lectores en alumnos de tercer ciclo de Educación Primaria y Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. [Reading processes assessment].Google Scholar
  49. R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.3.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
  50. Reitsma, P. (1989). Orthographic memory and learning to read. In P. G. Aaron & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (pp. 31–44). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  51. Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. V. M., Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2011). The role of self-teaching in learning orthographic and semantic aspects of new words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 47–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.536129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M., Carreiras, M., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico Informatizado del Español. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  53. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(2), 95–129.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(4), 267–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27(2), 217–235.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2702_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Suárez-Coalla, P., Álvarez-Cañizo, M., & Cuetos, F. (2016). Orthographic learning in Spanish children. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 292–311.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Suárez-Coalla, P., Avdyli, R., & Cuetos, F. (2014). Influence of context-sensitive rules on the formation of orthographic representations in Spanish dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1409.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2016). Semantic and phonological influences on visual word learning in a transparent language. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 772–781.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1164733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2017). Formation of orthographic representations in Spanish dyslexic children: The role of syllable complexity and frequency. Dyslexia, 23(1), 88–96.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Suárez-Coalla, P., Ramos, S., Álvarez-Cañizo, M., & Cuetos, F. (2014). Orthographic learning in dyslexic Spanish children. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(2), 166–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-014-0092-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taylor, J., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 60–76.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020126.Google Scholar
  64. Wechsler D. (2001). WISC-R: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. [Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para niños—Revisada]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
  65. Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 14(1), 1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93(3), 369–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OviedoOviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations