Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 68, Issue 3, pp 218–228 | Cite as

Influence of increased letter spacing and font type on the reading ability of dyslexic children

  • Mirela DuranovicEmail author
  • Smajlagic Senka
  • Branka Babic-Gavric


Recent research studies have shown that increased letter spacing has a positive effect on the reading ability of dyslexic individuals. This study aims to investigate the effect of spacing on the readability of different fonts for children with and without dyslexia. Results did not support the hypothesis of better performance among children with dyslexia when reading text in Dyslexie than in other fonts. They, however, revealed that only spacing plays a role in enhancing dyslexic individuals’ reading performance because Dyslexie and the Times New Roman interspaced font have no difference. Furthermore, the negative effect of the unfriendly fonts Times New Roman Italic and Curlz MT was eliminated through increased interletter spacing.


Dyslexia Dyslexie Font Letter spacing Reading 


  1. Bachmann, C., & Mengheri, L. (2018). Dyslexia and fonts: is a specific font useful? Brain Sciences, 8, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaton, A., McDougall, S., & Singleton, C. (1997). Dyslexia in literate adults. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boer, C. T. (2016). Dyslexie font. Retrieved from Date of retrieval: November 2016.
  4. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177e178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. British Dyslexia Association (2012). Dyslexia style guide, January 2012.
  6. Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition and component phonological processing skills of adults with childhood diagnosis of dyslexia. Developmental Review, 13, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruno-Golden, B. F. (2013). The integration of process analysis into the clinical assessment of children: A personal perspective: In Ashendorf, L., Swenson, R., Libon, D. The Boston process approach to neuropsychological assessment: a practitioner's guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 314–328.Google Scholar
  8. Duranovic, M. (2013). Test za procjenu disleksije [Dyslexia Screening Test]. In M. Duranovic & Z. Mrkonjic (Eds.), Procjena disleksije (Dyslexia assessment). Print-Com: Tuzla, Bosnia.Google Scholar
  9. Gabrieli, J. D. (2009). Dyslexia: a new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gori, S., & Facoetti, A. (2014). Perceptual learning as a possible new approach for remediation and prevention of developmental dyslexia. Vision Research, 99, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goswami, U. (2003). Why theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hawelka, S., & Wimmer, H. (2005). Impaired visual processing of multi-element arrays is associated with increased number of eye movements in dyslexic reading. Vision Research, 45, 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huckauf, A., Heller, D., & Nazir, T. A. (1999). Lateral masking: limitations of the feature interaction account. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8, 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuster, S. M., van Weerdenburg, M., Gompel, M., & Bosman, A. M. T. (2018). Dyslexie font does not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 68, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Legge, G. E., & Bigelow, C. A. (2011). Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lockley, S. (2002). Dyslexia and higher education: accessibility issues. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved 3 March 2014, from http://www.engsc.
  19. Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marinus, E., Mostard, M., Segers, E., Schubert, T. M., Madelaine, A., & Wheldall, K. (2016). A special font for people with dyslexia: does it work and, if so, why? Dyslexia, 22(3), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martelli, M., Di Filippo, G., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2009). Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 14.1–14.1418.Google Scholar
  22. Moret-Tatay, C., & Perea, M. (2011). Do serifs provide an advantage in the recognition of written words? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Brien, B. A., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (2005). The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 332–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oslo Corpus of Bosnian Texts (1997). Corpus.html. Accessed 12 March 2016.
  25. Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D., & Majaj, N. J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 20.1–20.2036.Google Scholar
  26. Perea, M., Giner, L., Marcet, A., & Gomez, P. (2016). Does extra interletter spacing help text reading in skilled adult readers? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19(e26), 1–7.Google Scholar
  27. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gómez, P. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22, 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., & Frith, U. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raven, M. S. (1963). Prirucnik za Progresivne matrice u boji. (manuals for colored progressive matrices). Beograd: Savez društava psihologa SR Srbije.Google Scholar
  33. Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2013). Good fonts for dyslexia. ASSETS 2013: the 15th international ACM SIGACCESS conference of computers and accessibility, Bellevue, Washington USA, 22-24 October.Google Scholar
  34. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sjoblom, A. M., Eaton, E., & Stagg, S. D. (2016). The effects of letter spacing and coloured overlays on reading speed and accuracy in adult dyslexia. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 630–639. Scholar
  37. Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Snowling, M. J. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Judica, A., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Crowding effects on word identification in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 38, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Terepocki, M., Kruk, R. S., & Willows, D. M. (2002). The incidence and nature of letter orientation errors in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vidyasagar, T. R., & Pammer, K. (2009). Dyslexia: a deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization (2016). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, ICD-10 (10th revision). URL:
  45. Yu, D., Cheung, S. H., Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. L. (2007). Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of Vision, 7, 2.1–2.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Koarrne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: language specific or universal. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., Bravar, L., George, F., Pech-Georgel, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 11455–11459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Speech-Language PathologyUniversity of TuzlaTuzlaBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations