Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 383–400 | Cite as

Take Flight: the evolution of an Orton Gillingham-based curriculum

  • Jeremiah J. Ring
  • Karen J. Avrit
  • Jeffrey L. Black
Article
  • 113 Downloads

Abstract

Thirty years ago in this journal, Aylett Royall Cox reported on the development of Alphabetic Phonics, a revision of the existing Orton Gillingham treatment for children with dyslexia. This paper continues that discussion and reports on the evolution of that curriculum as it is represented in a comprehensive dyslexia treatment program informed by intervention research. The paper describes the curriculum and reports data from a hospital-based learning disabilities clinic that provides qualified support for treatment efficacy and the value of added comprehension instruction. The results are then discussed in the context of current and future issues in dyslexia intervention.

Keywords

Dyslexia Intervention Orton Gillingham Reading 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Avrit, K., Allen, C., Carlsen, K., Gross, M., Pierce, D., & Rumsey, M. (2006). Take Flight: a comprehensive intervention for students with dyslexia. Dallas: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital.Google Scholar
  3. Avrit, K., & Rumsey, C. (1997). Multisensory approach to phonological processing for reading and spelling success. Dallas: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital.Google Scholar
  4. Beckham, P. B., & Biddle, M. L. (1987). Dyslexia Training Program. Cambridge: Educational Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Berends, I. E., & Reitsma, P. (2007). Orthographic analysis of words during fluency training promotes reading of new similar words. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Clonan, S. M., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2004). Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third graders and a 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 444–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bussing, R., Fernandez, M., Harwood, M., Hou, W., Garvan, C. W., Eyberg, S. M., et al. (2008). Parent and teacher SNAP-IV ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Psychometric properties and normative ratings from a school district sample. Assessment, 15, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conrad, N. J. (2008). From reading to spelling and spelling to reading: Transfer goes both ways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 869–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, A. R. (1985). Alphabetic phonics: An organization and expansion of Orton Gillingham. Annals of Dyslexia, 35, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, A. R. (1992). Foundations for literacy: Structures and techniques for multisensory teaching of basic written English language skills. Cambridge: Educators Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  15. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., et al. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington, D.C: Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
  17. Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E. C. (1988). Reading Mastery I/II Fast Cycle: Teacher’s guide. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). (2015). Public Law No. 114–95, § 4109.Google Scholar
  19. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Winikates, D., Mehta, P., Schatschneider, C., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). Early interventions for children with learning disabilities. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fry, E. B., & Kress, J. E. (2006). The reading teacher’s book of lists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. (1956). Remedial training for children with specific disability in reading, spelling and penmanship (5th ed.). Cambridge: Educators Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  22. Greenberg, J., Walsh, K., & McKee, A. (2014). Teacher prep review: A review of the nation’s teacher preparation programs. Washington, D.C.: National Council on Teacher Quality.Google Scholar
  23. Hanna, J. S., Hanna, P. R., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. USDOE Publication No. 32008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  24. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University.Google Scholar
  26. Joshi, R. M., Dahlgren, M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2002). Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory teaching approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1998). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, 52, 738–747.Google Scholar
  28. Levy, B. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain (pp. 357–379). Timonium: York Press.Google Scholar
  29. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lindamood, P., & Lindamood, P. (1975). Auditory discrimination in depth. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  31. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S. L. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 458–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., & De Palma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macon, J. M., Bewell, D., & Vogt, M. (1991). Responses to literature. Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  34. Melby-Lervag, M., Lyster, S. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris, R. D., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Francis, D. J., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. (2002). Public Law No. 107–110, §115, Stat. 1425.Google Scholar
  38. Oakland, T., Black, J. B., Stanford, G., Nussbaum, N. L., & Balise, R. R. (1998). An evaluation of the Dyslexia Training Program: A multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O'Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orton, S. T. (1925). “Word-blindness” in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Psychological Corporation. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment Company.Google Scholar
  44. Psychological Corporation. (2002). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment Company.Google Scholar
  45. Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richardson, E., & DiBenedetto, B. (1985). Decoding Skills Test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  47. Ritchey, K. D., & Goeke, J. L. (2006). Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swanson, J. M. (1992). School-based assessments and interventions for ADD students. Irvine: KC Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain (pp. 357–379). Timonium: York Press.Google Scholar
  52. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Uhry, J. K., & Clark, D. B. (2005). Dyslexia: theory and practice of remedial instruction (3rd ed.). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
  55. Underwood, J. D. M. (2000). A comparison of two types of computer support for reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., & Bryant, D. P. (2001). Collaborative Strategic Reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: examiner’s manual. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  60. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  61. Wechsler, D. (2003). WISC-IV Technical and Interpretive Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  62. Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. (2001). Gray Oral Reading Test. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  63. Wilson, B. (2002). The Wilson Reading System (3rd ed.). Milbury: Wilson Language Training Corporation.Google Scholar
  64. Wise, B. W., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Youman, M., & Mather, N. (2013). Dyslexia laws in the USA. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for ChildrenDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations