Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 356–368 | Cite as

Evaluating the impact of dyslexia laws on the identification of specific learning disability and dyslexia

Article

Abstract

Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that impacts word reading accuracy and/or reading fluency. Over half of the states in the USA have passed legislation intended to promote better identification of individuals with dyslexia. To date, no study has been conducted to investigate the potential impact of state laws on the identification of specific learning disability (SLD), and limited data has been presented on the rate at which students in public school settings are identified with dyslexia. The first aim of the current study was to determine if any detectable changes in the identification rates of SLD have occurred in states implementing dyslexia laws because most states do not report number of students identified as dyslexic but rather those students identified with an SLD. The second aim of the study was to characterize the rate of identifying dyslexia in the two states (Texas and Arkansas) that require public schools to report the number of students identified with dyslexia. The third aim was to characterize the identification rate across first to 12th grades. Current SLD rates range from 3.2 to 8.5% in all 50 states. Analysis of SLD prevalence rates did not vary between states with and without dyslexia laws in place. Moreover, there was no change in the identification of SLD once states had implemented these laws. Rates of dyslexia in Arkansas and Texas were less than 5%. Given the persistent levels indicating lack of reading proficiency, our review of data suggests that overall students with dyslexia are being underidentified.

Keywords

Dyslexia Legislation Prevalence Specific learning disability 

References

  1. Arkansas Department of Education (2016). 2015–2016 public school student dyslexia data [ADOE data file]. Available from http://www.arkansased.gov/divisions/learning-services/curriculum-and-instruction/dyslexia.
  2. Betjemann, R. S., Keenan, J. M., Olson, R. K., & Defires, J. C. (2011). Choice of reading comprehension test influences the outcomes of genetic analyses. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.493965.
  3. Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025323.
  4. Center for Public Education (2016). How many students with disabilities are in our schools: national data. Retrieved from Data First: Data Center: http://www.data-first.org/data/how-many-students-with-disabilities-are-in-our-schools/.
  5. Cunningham, B. (2016). What’s the difference between learning disabilities and intellectual disabilities. Retrieved from Understood for learning and attention issues: https://www.understood.org/en/learning-attention-issues/getting-started/what-you-need-to-know/whats-the-difference-between-learning-disabilities-and-intellectual-disabilities.
  6. Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5.
  7. Definition of dyslexia. (2002). Retrieved from International Dyslexia Association: https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/.
  8. Eide, F. (2016). Progress! Passed dyslexia laws in the United States. Dyslexia advantage. Retrieved from http://www.dyslexicadvantage.org/progress-passed-dyslexia-laws-in-the-united-states-2016/.
  9. Elliot, J. G., & Grigorenko, J. (2014). The dyslexia debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farris, E. A., Odegard, T. N., Miller, H. L., Ring, J., Allen, G., & Black, J. (2011). Functional connectivity between the left and right inferior frontal lobes in a small sample of children with and without reading difficulties. Neurocase, 17, 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2010.532141.
  11. Fletcher, J. (2009). Dyslexia: The evolution of a scientific concept. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/51355617709090900.
  12. Fletcher, J., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2006). Learning disabilities from identification to intervention. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 2004 [IDEA]. (2004). Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/about-idea/
  14. King, V. (2013). Meeting the needs of children with dyslexia in public schools. Arkansas Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.arkansased.gov/public/userfiles/Learning_Services/Dyslexia/Presentation_Act_1294.pdf
  15. Mather, N., & Wendling, B. J. (2011). Essentials of essentials of dyslexia: assessment and intervention. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. National Association for Educational Progress. (2015). The nation’s report card. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/.Google Scholar
  17. Odegard, T. N., Ring, J., Smith, S., Biggan, J., & Black, J. (2008). Differentiating the neural response to intervention in children with developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-008-0014-5.
  18. Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.008.
  19. Pennington, B. F. (2009). Diagnosing learning disorders: a neuropsychological framework (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Shaywitz, S. E. (1998). Dyslexia. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801293380507
  21. Shaywitz, S. E. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  22. Shaywitz, S. E., Fletcher, J. M., Shneider, A. E., Marchione, K. E., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Pugh, K. R., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut longitudinal study at adolescence. Pediatrics, 104, 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.104.6.1351.
  23. Texas Education Agency (2010). Texas dyslexia handbook: procedures concerning dyslexia and related disorders. Austin. Retrieved from http://www.dys-add.com/resources/SpecialEd/TexasDyslexiaHandbook11-10-2010.pdf.
  24. Texas Education Agency (2014). 2013–2014 students identified with dyslexia [PEIMS data file] Available from http://tea.texas.gov/Reports_and_Data/Data_Submission/PEIMS/PEIMS_Data_Standards/PEIMS_Data_Standards/.
  25. Texas Education Agency (2015). 2014–2015 students identified with dyslexia [PEIMS data file] Available from http://tea.texas.gov/Reports_and_Data/Data_Submission/PEIMS/PEIMS_Data_Standards/PEIMS_Data_Standards/.
  26. Texas Education Agency (2016). 2015–2016 students identified with dyslexia [PEIMS data file] Available from http://tea.texas.gov/Reports_and_Data/Data_Submission/PEIMS/PEIMS_Data_Standards/PEIMS_Data_Standards/.
  27. United States Department of Education (2016a). Institute of education sciences. Retrieved from National Center for Education Services: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cnb.asp.
  28. United States Department of Education (2016b). IDEA section 618 data products. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/osepidea/618-data/index.html.
  29. United States Department of Education (2016c). Office of special education and rehabilitative services. Available from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/index.html?exp=5.
  30. Vellutino, F. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Developmental dyslexia. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: a handbook (pp. 362–378). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..Google Scholar
  31. Youman, M., & Mather, N. (2013). Dyslexia laws in the United States. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0076-2.
  32. Youman, M., & Mather, N. (2015). Dyslexia laws in the United States: an update. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 41, 10–18.Google Scholar
  33. Yudin, M.K. (2015). Dear colleague letter regarding dyslexia guidance. U.S. Department of Education: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/guidance-on-dyslexia-10-2015.pdf.

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Anne Barber Phillips
    • 1
  • Timothy N. Odegard
    • 1
  1. 1.Middle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations