How Portuguese and American teachers plan for literacy instruction
- 240 Downloads
This study explored American and Portuguese elementary teachers’ preferences in planning for literacy instruction using the Language Arts Activity Grid (LAAG; Cunningham, Zibulsky, Stanovich, & Stanovich, 2009), on which teachers described their preferred instructional activities for a hypothetical 2-h language arts block. Portuguese teachers (N = 186) completed Portuguese versions of a background questionnaire and LAAG electronically, in Survey Monkey; American teachers (N = 102) completed identical English measures using paper and pencil. Results showed that teachers in both groups usually addressed comprehension and reading fluency on their LAAGs and that they also allocated the most time to these two areas. However, American teachers were more likely to include teacher-directed fluency activities, whereas Portuguese teachers were more likely to include fluency activities that were not teacher directed. Significantly more American than Portuguese teachers addressed phonics in their planning, whereas significantly more Portuguese than American teachers addressed writing processes such as revision. Both groups of educators demonstrated large variability in planning, with many teachers omitting important components of literacy identified by researchers, for writing as well as reading. The study highlights the importance of providing teachers with comprehensive, research-based core literacy curricula as well as professional development on key components of literacy. Study findings also suggest significant relationships between orthographic transparency and teachers’ instructional planning.
KeywordsCross-linguistic Reading Teacher beliefs Teacher education Teacher knowledge Writing
This research was supported by a 2-year grant from the Foundation Francisco Manuel dos Santos in Portugal as well as by a Connecticut State University research grant in the U.S.A. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to these funding agencies as well as to the teachers and school districts who participated in the study and sent messages of interest about our research. In addition, warm thanks to our research assistants for their help with data collection, coding, and analysis, and to Anne Cunningham for providing us with inspiration as well as guidance in this work.
- Adams, M. J. (2012). On the importance of standards. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 38, 11–14.Google Scholar
- August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Berninger, V., & Abbott, S. (2003). Research-supported reading and writing lessons. San Antonio, Tx: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Shimada, S., et al. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., . . . Wilder, T. D. (2009). First grade teachers' knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 425-455. Google Scholar
- Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Calkins, L. (2011). A curricular plan for the writing workshop. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Cardoso-Martins, C. (1995). Sensitivity to rhymes, syllables, and phonemes in literacy acquisition in Portuguese. Reading Research Quarterly, 808-828.Google Scholar
- Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO] & National Governors’ Association [NGA]. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English/language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, & technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ela-literacy.
- Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
- Graham, S., & Hebert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/publications/search-publications/pub/315/.
- Graham, S., McArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2007). Best practices in writing instruction. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Hooper, S. R., Costa, L. J. C., McBee, M., Anderson, K. L., Yerby, D. C., Childress, A., et al. (2013). A written language intervention for at-risk second grade students: A randomized controlled trial of the process assessment of the learner lesson plans in a tier 2 response-to-intervention (RtI) model. Annals of Dyslexia, 63(1), 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Joshi, R.M., Treiman, R., Carreker, S., & Moats, L. (Winter, 2008-2009). How words cast their spell. American Educator, 6-16, 42-43.Google Scholar
- Lima, R. P. (2013). Governo avança com 20 mil despedimentos [Government fires 20 thousand people. Half are teachers], Expresso. Retrieved from http://expresso.sapo.pt/governo-avanca-com-20-mil-despedimentos=f793681.
- Lopes, J. A. (2010). Conceptualização, avaliação e intervenção nas dificuldades de aprendizagem: A sofisticada arquitectura de um equívoco [Conceptualization, evaluation and intervention in learning disabilities: The sophisticated architecture of a misconception]. Braga: Psiquilíbrios.Google Scholar
- Lopes, J., & Almeida, L. S. (2015). Questões e modelos de avaliação e intervenção em Psicologia Escolar [Assessment and intervention issues and models in School Psychology]. Estudos de Psicologia, 32(1).Google Scholar
- Lopes, J., Silva, M. M., Spear-Swerling, L., & Zibulsky, J. (2015). Prosody growth and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from 2nd through end of 3rd grade. Journal of Psychodidactics, 20(1), 45–65.Google Scholar
- Lopes, J., Spear-Swerling, L., Oliveira, C., Velasquez, M. G., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Actual disciplinary knowledge, perceived disciplinary knowledge, teaching experience, and teachers' training for reading instruction: a study with primary Portuguese and American teachers. Journal of Psychodidactics, 19(1), 45–65.Google Scholar
- Metas Curriculares de Portugues. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.dgidc.min-edu.pt/index.php?s=noticias¬icia=396.
- Moats, L. C. (2005/2006). How spelling supports reading—and why it is more regular and predictable than you may think. American Educator, 12–22, 42–43.Google Scholar
- Moats, L. C. (2012). Reconciling the common core state standards with reading research. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 38, 15–18.Google Scholar
- National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Report of the National Commission on Writing in America’s schools and colleges. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, R. E. (2011). Phoneme awareness and the alphabetic principle. In R. E. O’Connor & P. F. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 9–26). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2012). Strategic, meaningful, and effective writing instruction for elementary students. In M. C. Hougen & S. M. Smartt (Eds.), Fundamentals of literacy instruction & assessment, pre-K-6 (pp. 205–224). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
- Plano Nacional de Leitura. (2007). Retrieved from www.planonacionaldeleitura.gov.pt/index1.php.
- Rand Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
- Scarborough, H. S. (2002). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–125). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Spear-Swerling, L. (2015). The power of RTI and reading profiles: A blueprint for solving reading problems. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Spear-Swerling, L., & Cheesman, E. (2012). Teachers' knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1691–1723.Google Scholar
- Spear-Swerling, L., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(8), 1353–1378.Google Scholar
- Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar