Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 44–63

Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities

  • Rachel Schiff
  • Sarit Schwartz-Nahshon
  • Revital Nagar


This research explored phonological and morphological awareness among Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities (RD) and its effect on reading comprehension beyond phonological and word-reading abilities. Participants included 39 seventh graders with RD and two matched control groups of normal readers: 40 seventh graders matched for chronological age (CA) and 38 third graders matched for reading age (RA). We assessed phonological awareness, word reading, morphological awareness, and reading comprehension. Findings indicated that the RD group performed similarly to the RA group on phonological awareness but lower on phonological decoding. On the decontextualized morphological task, RD functioned on par with RA, whereas in a contextualized task RD performed above RA but lower than CA. In reading comprehension, RD performed as well as RA. Finally, results indicated that for normal readers contextual morphological awareness uniquely contributed to reading comprehension beyond phonological and word-reading abilities, whereas no such unique contribution emerged for the RD group. The absence of an effect of morphological awareness in predicting reading comprehension was suggested to be related to a different recognition process employed by RD readers which hinder the ability of these readers to use morphosemantic structures. The lexical quality hypothesis was proposed as further support to the findings, suggesting that a low quality of lexical representation in RD students leads to ineffective reading skills and comprehension. Lexical representation is thus critical for both lexical as well as comprehension abilities.


Morphological awareness Phonological awareness Reading comprehension Reading disorder 


  1. Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 118–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition, 64, 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman, R. A. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman, R. A. (2000). Children’s innovative verbs versus. nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Berman, R. A. (2002). Children’s lexical innovations: Developmental perspectives on Hebrew verb structure. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 243–291). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  8. Bolozky, S. (1999). Measuring productivity in word formation: The sase of Israeli Hebrew. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  9. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81, 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brissolara, D., Pecini, C., Chilosi, A., Cipriani, P., Gasperini, F., Mazzotti, L., et al. (2006). Do phonological and rapid automized naming deficits differentially affect dyslexic children with and without a history of language delay? A study on Italian dyslexic children. Cognitive and Behavioural Psychology, 56, 445–467.Google Scholar
  11. Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects and early reading achievement (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Casalis, S., Cole, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curtin, S., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 515–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological?” The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 103–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Defior, S. (2004). Phonological awareness and learning to read: A cross linguistic perspective. In P. Bryant & T. Nunes (Eds.), Handbook on children’s literacy (pp. 163–174). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  22. Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2003). Lexical organization and lexical access in a non-concatenated morphology: Mapping the mental lexicon. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 165–186). Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.Google Scholar
  24. Duncan, L. G., & Johnston, R. S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 405–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Egan, J., & Pring, L. (2004). The processing inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 567–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elbro, C., & Jensen, M. N. (2005). Quality of phonological representations, verbal learning, and phoneme awareness in dyslexic and normal readers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. First, M. B., Frances, A., Pincus, H. A., Massana Montejo, G. T., & Valdes Miyar, M. R. (2002). DSM-IV-RT. Differential diagnosis manual. Barcelona: Masson [In Spanish].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hepburn, A. (1968). The performance of normal children of differing reading ability on the ITPA. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiménez González, J., & Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joanisse, M. C., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, D. J., & Grant, J. O. (1989). Written narratives of normal and learning disabled children. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphological awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 783–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leikin, M. (2002). Processing syntactic functions of words in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leong, C. K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leong, C. K., & Parkinson, M. E. (1995). Processing of English morphological structure by poor readers. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 237–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  46. Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mann, V. A. (2000). Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mann, V. A., & Singson, M. (2003). The little suffix that could: Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Morphology and reading: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: Kluver.Google Scholar
  49. Mimouni, Z., Kehayia, E., & Jarema, G. (1998). The mental representation of singular and plural nouns in Algerian Arabic as revealed through auditory priming in agrammatic aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 61, 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moats, L. (1996). Phonological spelling errors in the writing of dyslexic adolescents. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Müller, K., & Brady, S. (2001). Correlated of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 757–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. C. (2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Education and Psychology, 98, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ortar, G. (1987). “Hava Nikra”. Mivhan lehavant hanikra (“Let’s Read”. A reading comprehension test). Jerusalem: Ahiever.Google Scholar
  54. Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P., & Lefly, D. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypothesis for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 1–27.Google Scholar
  57. Porpodas, C. D. (1999). Patterns of phonological and memory processing in beginning readers and spellers of Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 406–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (Eds.). (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Brookline.Google Scholar
  59. Ransby, M. J., & Swanson, H. L. (2003). Reading comprehension skills of young adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 538–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raveh, M., & Schiff, R. (2008). Visual and auditory morphological priming in adults with development dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raven, J. C. (1959). Colored progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
  62. Ravid, D. (1990). Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 24, 289–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ravid, D. (2002). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  65. Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ravid, D., & Hanauer, D. (1998). A prototype theory of rhyme: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ravid, D., & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2007). Morphological abilities in Hebrew-speaking grade-schoolers from two socio-economic backgrounds: An analogy task. First Language, 26, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schiff, R. (2004). Mivhan lebdikat mudaut fonologit (Phonological awareness task: An internal diagnostic test battery). Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan: Hadad Center for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities. [In Hebrew]Google Scholar
  70. Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2006). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-Speaking University students with dyslexia compared with typically developing grade-schoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schiff, R., Kahta, S., & Katzir, T. (2008). Mivhan bekri’at milim: Kri’at milim menukadot velo menukadot (Single-word reading test: Pointed and unpointed word reading). Ramat-Gan: Haddad Center, Bar-Ilan University [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  74. Schwarzwald, O. R. (2001). Modern Hebrew. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
  75. Serrano, F., & Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shalem, Z., & Lachman, D. (1998). Ma’arexet le’ivhun tahalixei kri’a be’ivrit (Diagnostic battery for reading processes in the Hebrew language). Tel Aviv: Nitzan [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  77. Shani, M., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., Bahat, A., & Zeiger, T. (2006). Alef ad Taf. Ma’arexet le’ivhum likuyim betahalixei kri’a vektiva (Aleph-Taf. Diagnostic test battery for written language disorders). Holon: Mofet Institute and Nitzan Association, Yesod Press [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  78. Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. E., Brady, S. A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparisons of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding and self-teaching. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 31–82). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.Google Scholar
  80. Siegel, L. S. (2008). Morphological awareness skills of English language learners and children with Dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stanovitch, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stanovitch, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sternberg, R. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 587–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wimmer, H. (1996). The early manifestation of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from German children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2001). Is the reading-rate problem of German dyslexic children caused by slow visual processes? In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and brain (pp. 116–133). New York: York.Google Scholar
  90. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised. Circles Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  91. Worthy, J., & Vise, N. (1996). Morphological, phonological, and orthographic differences between the spelling of normally achieving children and basic literacy adults. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Schiff
    • 1
    • 4
  • Sarit Schwartz-Nahshon
    • 2
  • Revital Nagar
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Education and Haddad Center for Research in DyslexiaBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael
  2. 2.Ministry of EducationJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.EFL UnitBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael
  4. 4.Haddad Center for Dyslexia and Reading Disorders, School of EducationBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations