Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 49–71 | Cite as

Does third grade discrepancy status predict the course of reading development?

  • Lynn Flowers
  • Marianne Meyer
  • James Lovato
  • Frank Wood
  • Rebecca Felton
Part II Understanding Dyslexia: IQ-Discrepancy And Other Definitional Issues

Abstract

There is persisting debate concerning the use of an ability-achievement discrepancy formula to define and identify learning disabled—including reading disabled—students. This study employs mixed effects regression growth curve analysis to assess the developmental course of discrepant and nondiscrepant readers (within poor readers) who were identified in third grade and retested in fifth, eighth, and twelfth grades. The results showed that discrepancy status does not differentiate the developmental course of basic reading skills (word identification or decoding), reading comprehension, or underlying cognitive abilities (phonemic awareness and fluency) in poor readers. The ability-achievement discrepancy model is not supported. Educational and legislative reasons for the persisting difficulties of poor readers are explored and recommendations for changes in public policy are made.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allington, R. L. (1980). Poor readers don’t get to read much in reading groups. Language Arts, 57, 872–876.Google Scholar
  3. Badian, N. A. (1995). Predicting reading ability over the long term: The changing roles of letter naming, phonological awareness and orthographic processing. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 79–96.Google Scholar
  4. Badian, N. A. (1996). Dyslexia: Does it exist: Dyslexia, garden-variety poor reading and the double deficit hypothesis. Poster presented at the Orton Dyslexia Society conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Badian, N. A. (2000) Do pre-school orthographic skills contribute to prediction of reading? In N. A. Badian (ed.), Prediction and prevention of reading failure (pp. 31–56). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berninger, V. W., & Abbot, R. D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies in failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In G. R. Lyon, (ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 163–168). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  7. Biddle, K. R. (1996). Timing deficits in impaired readers: An investigation of visual naming speed and verbal fluency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Felton, R. H. (1998). The development of reading skills in poor readers: Educational implications. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 219–233). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., & Wood, F. B. (1990). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain and Language, 39, 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. B. (1992). Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder. A reading level match study of nonword reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 3–13.Google Scholar
  12. Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. B. (1992). A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQ. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 318–326.Google Scholar
  13. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., & Shaywitz, B. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flowers, D. L. (1994). Neuropsychological profiles of persistent reading disability and reading improvement. In C. K. Leong, & R. M. Joshi (eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 61–77). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Foorman. B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Lynn A. (1996). Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level match designs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Francis, D. J., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., Lipsey, M. E., & Eaton, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of reading differences between underachievers with and without the disabilities label: A brief report. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 1–3.Google Scholar
  18. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.Google Scholar
  19. Grigorenko, E., Wood, F. W., Meyer, M. S., Hart, L. A., Speed, W. C., Shuster, A., & Pauls, D. L. (1997). Susceptibility loci for distinct components of developmental dyslexia on chromosomes 6 and 15. American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 27–39.Google Scholar
  20. Grigorenko, E., Wood, F., Meyer, M., & Pauls, D. (In press). Linkage studies suggest a possible locus for developmental dyslexia on chromosome 1. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics).Google Scholar
  21. Herjanic, B., & Reich, W. (1982). Development of a structured psychiatric interview for children: Agreement between child and parent on individual symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hollingshead, A. B. (1957). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from P.O. Box 1965, Yale Station, New Haven, CT 06520).Google Scholar
  23. Jastak, J., & Bijou, S. (1946). Wide range achievement test. Wilmington: Jastak Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principal and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler, & I. Y. Liberman (eds.), Phonology and reading disability (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lindamood, C. H., & Lindamood, P. C. (1979). Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Allen, TX: DLM.Google Scholar
  27. Lindamood, C. H., Lindamood, P. C., & Calfee, R. C. (1974). The LAC test: A new look at auditory conceptualization and literacy development K-12. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association Convention, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
  28. Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3–27.Google Scholar
  29. Lyon, G. R. (1996). Learning disabilities. The Future of Children, 6, 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyon, G. R. (1998). Critical advances in understanding reading acquisition and reading difficulty. Paper presented at the North Carolina Branch of the International Dyslexia Association, November 1998, Boone, NC.Google Scholar
  31. MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., & Bocian, K. M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314–326.Google Scholar
  32. Meyer, M. S., Wood, F. B., Hart, L. A., & Felton, R. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106–117.Google Scholar
  33. National Reading Panel Report. (2000). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
  34. Perfetti, C. A., Beck, L., Bell, L., & Huges, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.Google Scholar
  35. Richardson, E., & DeBenedetto, G. (1985). The decoding skills test. Parkton, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rosner, J. (1979). Helping children overcome learning difficulties. New York, NY: Walker & Co.Google Scholar
  37. Rosner, J., & Simon, D. P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.Google Scholar
  38. Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975) The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Satz, P., Taylor, H. G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disability: A six-year follow-up. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 313–347). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.Google Scholar
  41. Siegel, L. S. (1998). The discrepancy formula: Its use and abuse. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (eds.), Specific reading disabilities: A view of the spectrum. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Share, D. L., & Silva, P. A. (1986). The stability and classification of specific reading retardation: A longitudinal study from age 7 to 11. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 32–39.Google Scholar
  43. Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 91–103, 122.Google Scholar
  44. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model of reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thorndike, R. L. (1963). The concepts of over- and underachievement. New York: Columbia University Bureau of Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Torgeson, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.Google Scholar
  49. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238.Google Scholar
  50. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence test for children-revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  52. Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming deficits in dyslexia. Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In B. L. Blachman (ed.), Cognitive and linguistic foundations of reading acquisition: Implications for intervention research (pp. 67–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  53. Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.Google Scholar
  55. Woodcock, R. W. (1978). Development and standardization of the Woodcock Johnson psycho-educational battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
  56. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Allen, TX: DLM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn Flowers
    • 1
  • Marianne Meyer
    • 1
  • James Lovato
    • 1
  • Frank Wood
    • 1
  • Rebecca Felton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston-Salem
  2. 2.Simmons CollegeBoston

Personalised recommendations