Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 31–51

Schools as host environments: Toward a schoolwide reading improvement model

  • Edward J. Kame’enui
  • Deborah C. Simmons
  • Michael D. Coyne
Part II Intervention Issues

Abstract

Despite vast differences among school districts across the country, all students must learn how to read in a complex “host-environment” called a school. A challenge in beginning reading, therefore, is to transcend these differences and focus, instead, on the essential task of teaching reading in schools. Teaching reading involves attending to what we know about beginning reading and the alphabetic writing system, the difficulties of reading, and the challenges associated with dyslexia. Teaching reading in a school requires that interventions be tailored to the unique needs of an individual school and implemented and sustained at the school building level. In this article, we outline the Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model (SRIM). This model is characterized by the strategic integration of research-based practices in assessment, instructional design, and beginning reading instruction. Additionally, the SRIM acknowledges the specific needs of individual schools and is customized to provide the best fit with each unique “host-environment.” First we provide a description of each major stage of the SRIM and then an example of its application in a school district in western Oregon.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. J. 1990. Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning About Print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Lundberg, I., and Beeler, T. D. 1997. Phonemic Awareness in Young Children: A Classroom Curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  3. American Federation of Teachers. 1999. Building on the Best, Learning From What Works: Seven Promising Reading and English Language Arts Programs. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  4. Carnine, D. 1997. Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 30:130–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. B. 1963. A model of school learning. Teachers College Record 64:723–33.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. B. 1989. The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher 18:26–31.Google Scholar
  7. Deno, S. L. 1992. The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure 36:5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engelmann, S., and Bruner, E. 1998. Reading Mastery I: Distar Reading. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Felton, R. H., and Pepper, P. P. 1995. Early identification and intervention of phonological deficits in kindergarten and early elementary children at risk for reading disability. School Psychology Review 24:405–14.Google Scholar
  10. Fuchs, D., and Fuchs, L. 1994. Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children 60:518–37.Google Scholar
  11. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., and Germann, G. 1993. Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review 22:27–48.Google Scholar
  12. Good, R., III, Simmons, D. C., and Smith, S. 1998. Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. School Psychology Review 27:740–53.Google Scholar
  13. Hasbrouck, J. E., and Tindal, G. 1992. Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children 24:41–44.Google Scholar
  14. Hedges, L. V., and Waddington, T. 1993. From evidence to knowledge to policy: Research synthesis for policy formation. Review of Educational Research 63:345–52.Google Scholar
  15. Juel, C. 1988. Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology 80:437–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kame’enui, E. J. 1998. The rhetoric of all, the reality of some, and the unmistakable smell of mortality. In Literacy for All: Issues in Teaching and Learning, eds. J. Osborn and F. Lehr. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Kame’enui, E. J., and Carnine, D. W. 1998. Effective Teaching Strategies That Accommodate Diverse Learners. Columbus, OH: Merrill, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Kame’enui, E. J., and Simmons, D. C. 1998. Beyond effective practice to schools as host environments: Building and sustaining a school-wide intervention model in reading. Oregon School Study Council Bulletin 41:3–24.Google Scholar
  19. Kame’enui, E. J., and Simmons, D. C. 1999. Planning and Evaluation Tool for Effective Schoolwide Reading Programs. Unpublished document.Google Scholar
  20. Kame’enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., and Coyne, M. D. 1999. Kindergarten Reading Instruction and the Tyranny Of Time: Toward a Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  21. Kaminski, R. A., and Good, R. H., III. 1996. Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review 25:215–27.Google Scholar
  22. Kaminski, R. A., and Good, R. H., III. 1998. Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. In Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement, ed. M. R. Shinn. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Markell, M. A., and Deno, S. L. 1997. Effects of increasing oral reading: Generalization across reading tasks. The Journal of Special Education 31:233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moats, L. C. 1999. Teaching Reading Is Rocket Science: What Expert Teachers of Reading Should Know and Be Able To Do. Washington, D.C: American Federation of Teachers.Google Scholar
  25. Mosenthal, P. 1984. The problem of partial specification in translating reading research into practice. The Elementary School Journal 85:199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. National Research Council 1998. Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Notari-Syverson, A., O’Connor, R. E., and Vadasy, P. F. 1998. Ladders to Literacy: A Kindergarten Activity Book. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  28. SRA Open Court Reading 2000. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Shinn, M. 1997. Instructional Decision Making Using Curriculum-Based Measurement. Unpublished workshop materials.Google Scholar
  30. Simmons, D. C., and Kame’enui, E. J. 1998. What Reading Research Tells Us About Children With Diverse Learning Needs: Bases and Basics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Simmons, D., King, K., Kuykendall, K., Cornachione, C., and Kame’enui, E. J. 2000. Implementation of a school-wide reading improvement model: No one ever told us it would be this hard. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 15 (2):92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., and Wasik, B. A. 1996. Every Child, Every School: Success for All. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  33. Stanovich, K. E. 1999. The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 32:350–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sugai, G., and Horner, R. H. 1999. Discipline and behavioral support: Practices, pitfalls, and promises. Effective School Practices 17:10–22.Google Scholar
  35. Torgesen, J. K. 1998. Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent reading failure in young children. American Educator 22:32–39.Google Scholar
  36. Torgesen, J. K., and Bryant, B. T. 1994. Phonological Awareness Training for Reading. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  37. U. S. Department of Education. 1999. Start Early, Finish Strong: How To Help Every Child Become a Reader. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, America Reads Challenge.Google Scholar
  38. Zins, J. E., and Ponti, C. R. 1990. Best practices in school-based consultation. In Best Practices in School Psychology - II, eds. A. Thomas and J. Grimes. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward J. Kame’enui
    • 1
  • Deborah C. Simmons
    • 1
  • Michael D. Coyne
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement, Education Annex1211 University of OregonEugene

Personalised recommendations