Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 693–704 | Cite as

Evaluating the colonization and distribution of fungal and bacterial bio-aerosol in Rajkot, western India using multi-proxy approach

  • Charmi Humbal
  • Suneel Kumar Joshi
  • Ujwal Kumar Trivedi
  • Sneha GautamEmail author
Article

Abstract

Bio-aerosol is an emerging pollutant of the technological age. Air pollution related episodes that are a region-specific phenomenon in our atmosphere, with bio-aerosols being the main area of the problem. The present research was focused on assessing the particulate, and culturable concentration of bacteria at five different spatially located sites in the Rajkot city and surroundings, in the western part of India. The highest (108.33 × 109 CFU m−3) and lowest (318 × 103 CFU m−3) bacterial concentrations were found in dump site and residential area, respectively. With reference to particulate concentration, higher (101.79 ± 8.09) concentrations were reported in the industrial area than other sampling locations. All sampling sites under the present study displayed greater variability of bacteria than that of particle concentration. The growth potential of various bacterial isolates from perspective bioaerosol was measured spectroscopically by measuring OD at 600 nm in rich medium. The isolate 1A displayed significantly higher growth compared to all other isolates after 24 h. Outcomes of the current work suggested that bacterial concentration was observed in the respirable fraction (< 2.5 μm) and so had the potential to penetrate the deeper part of the lungs. In addition, meteorological parameters (i.e., wind speed, temperature, and relative humidity) were measured to understand whether they had any effect on biotic matter. The temperature and relative humidity are the most important meteorological parameters responsible for the enhanced viability of bacteria. Land use and land cover feature were also studied to understand the spatial characteristics of bio-aerosol in the study area. This viewpoint summarizes available information on bio-aerosols and its impact on human health, devising strategies to understand characteristics of bio-aerosols and emphasizing the vital gaps in available knowledge such as to develop a relationship between biological agents and solid/liquid or a mixture of both to the assessment of dispersion behavior and toxicological nature during exposure.

Keywords

Bio-aerosol Urban air Bacteria PM2.5 LULC India 

Abbreviations

VOC

volatile organic compounds

LULC

land use and land cover

NDVI

normalized difference vegetation index

SRTM

Shuttle radar topographic mission

DEM

digital elevation model

LBA

Luria-Bertani Agar

T

temperature

WS

wind speed

RH

relative humidity

PM2.5

particle concentrationn

Notes

Acknowledgments

Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India provided us the required funding and support during fieldwork and analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, p 28Google Scholar
  2. Bauleo L, Bucci S, Antonucci C, Sozzi R, Davoli M, Forastiere F, Ancona C (2019) Long-term exposure to air pollutants from multiple sources and mortality in an industrial area: a cohort study. Occup Environ Med 76:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxi SN, Portnoy JM, Larenas-Linnemann D, Phipatanakul W (2016) Exposure and health effects of Fungi on humans. J Allergy Clin Immunol 4(3):396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brągoszewska E, Biedroń I, Kozielska B, Pastuszka JS (2018) Microbiological indoor air quality in an office building in Gliwice, Poland: analysis of the case study. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buttner MP, Stetzenbach LD (1993) Monitoring airborne fungal fpores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:219–226Google Scholar
  6. Egan C, Li D-W, Klironomos J (2014) Detection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores in the air across different biomes and ecoregions. Fungal Ecol 12:26–31Google Scholar
  7. Erinjery JJ, Singh M, Kent R (2018) Mapping and assessment of vegetation types in the tropical rainforests of the Western Ghats using multispectral Sentinel-2 and SAR Sentinel-1 satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 216:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80:185–201Google Scholar
  9. Gautam S, Kumar P, Patra P (2016) Occupational exposure to particulate matter in three Indian opencast mines. Air Qual Atmos Health 9:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GBD (2013) Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators, 2015. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet Lond Engl 385:117–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2 Google Scholar
  11. Genitsaris S, Stefanidou N, Katsiapi M, Kormas KA, Sommer U, Moustaka-Gounia M (2017) Variability of airborne bacteria in an urban Mediterranean area (Thessaloniki, Greece). Atmosphere Environment 157:101–110Google Scholar
  12. Giriraj A, Murthy MSR, Ramesh BR, Dutt CBS (2009) A method for assessing evergreen habitats using phytodiversity and geospatial techniques in tropical rain forests of southern Western Ghats (India). Ecol Res 24:749–760.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0547-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldewijk KK, Ramankutty N (2004) Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities: the availability of new global data sets. Geol J 61:335–344Google Scholar
  14. Goyer N, Lavoie J, Lazure L, Marchand G (2001) Bioaerosols in the Workplace: Evaluations, Control and Prevention Guide; IRSST, Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert Sauvé: Montreal, QC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta A, Gautam S, Mehta N, Patel M, Telatiya A (2019) Association between changes in air quality and hospital admissions during the Holi festival. SN Appl Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0165-5
  16. Halonen M, Stern DA, Wright AL, Taussig LM, Martinez FD (1997) Alternaria as a major allergen for asthma in children raised in a desert environment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:1356–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkes CV, Kivlin SN, Rocca JD, Huguet V, Thomsen MA, Suttle KB (2010) Fungal community responses to precipitation. Glob Chang Biol 17:1637–1645Google Scholar
  18. Hilker T, Wulder MA, Coops NC, Linke J, McDermid G, Masek JG, Gao F, White JC (2009) A new data fusion model for high spatial- and temporal-resolution mapping of forest disturbance based on Landsat and MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 113:1613–1627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSE.2009.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Homer CG, Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B. (2002) Development of a circa 2000 landcover database for the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  20. Humbal C, Gautam S, Trivedi UK (2018) A review on recent progress in observations, and health effects of bioaerosols. Environ Int 118:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Husman T (1996) Health effects of indoor-air microorganism. Scand J Work Environ Health 22(1):5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang SH, Park WM, Ahn JK, Lee KJ, Min KB, Park JB (2016) Relationship between culturable airborne bacteria concentrations and ventilation systems in underground subway stations in Seoul, South Korea. Air Qual Atmos Health 9:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inal A, Karakoc GB, Altintas DU, Guvenmez HK, Aka Y, Gelisken R, Yilmaz M, Kendirli SG (2007) Effect of indoor mold concentrations on daily symptom severity of children with asthma and/or rhinitis monosensitized to molds. J Asthma 44:543–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson ES, Choi K-M (2012) Lung cancer risk in workers in the meat and poultry industries—a review. Zoonoses Public Health 59:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones AM, Harrison RM (2004) The effects of meteorological factors on atmospheric bioaerosol concentrations—a review. Sci Total Environ 326:151–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung JH, Lee JE, Lee CH, Kim SS, Lee BU (2009) Treatment of fungal bioaerosols by a high-temperature, short-time process in a continuous-flow system. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2742–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan AAH, Karuppayi SM (2012) Fungal pollution of indoor environments and its management. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 19:405–426Google Scholar
  28. Kim K-H, Kabir E, Jahan SA (2017) Airborne bioaerosols and their impact on human health. J Environ Sci 67:23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar A, Attri AK (2016) Characterization of fungal spores in ambient particulate matter: a study from the Himalayan region. Atmos Environ 142:182–193Google Scholar
  30. Laurin GV, Liesenberg V, Chen Q, Guerriero L, Del Frate F et al (2013) Optical and SAR sensor synergies for forest and land cover mapping in a tropical site in West Africa. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 21:7–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li M, Qi J, Zhang H, Huang S, Li L, Gao D (2011) Concentration and size distribution of bioaerosols in an outdoor environment in the Qingdao coastal region. Sci Total Environ 409:3812–3819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li Y, Fu H, Wang W, Liu J, Meng Q, Wang W (2015) Characteristics of bacterial and fungal aerosols during the autumn haze days in Xi’an, China. Atmos Environ 122:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Madureira J, Aguiar L, Pereira C, Mendes A, Querido MM, Neves P, Teixeira JP (2018) Indoor exposure to bioaerosol particles: levels and implications for inhalation dose rates in schoolchildren. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:955–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mclean D, Cheng S, Woodward A, Pearce N (2004) Mortality and cancer incidence in New Zealand meat workers. Occup Environ Med 61(6):541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Montero A, Dueker ME, O’Mullan GD (2016) Culturable bioaerosols along an urban waterfront are primarily associated with coarse particles. PeerJ 4:e2827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Núñez A, Amo de Paz G, Rastrojo A, García AM, Alcamí A, Gutiérrez-Bustillo AM, Moreno DA (2016) Monitoring of airborne biological particles in outdoor atmosphere. Part 1: importance, variability and ratios. Int Microbiol 19:1–13Google Scholar
  37. Reddy CS, Jha CS, Diwakar PG, Dadhwal VK (2015) Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS. Environ Monit Assess 187:777.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4990-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu X, Lu Y, Zhou S, Chen L, Xu B (2015) Impact of climate change on human infectious diseases: empirical evidence and human adaptation. Environ Int 86:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xian G, Homer C, Fry J (2009) Updating the 2001 national land cover database land cover classification to 2006 by using Landsat imagery change detection methods. Remote Sens Environ 113:1133–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhong X, Qi J, Li H, Dong L, Gao D (2016) Seasonal distribution of microbial activity in bioaerosols in the outdoor environment of the Qingdao coastal region. Atmos Environ 140:506–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charmi Humbal
    • 1
  • Suneel Kumar Joshi
    • 2
  • Ujwal Kumar Trivedi
    • 3
  • Sneha Gautam
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringMarwadi UniversityRajkotIndia
  2. 2.National Institute of HydrologyRoorkeeIndia
  3. 3.Department of MicrobiologyMarwadi UniversityRajkotIndia

Personalised recommendations