Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 683–692 | Cite as

Highly size-resolved characterization of water-soluble inorganic ions in submicron atmospheric particles

  • Qinghua Zhou
  • Jie Wang
  • Wenwen Yan
  • Kaijie Tang
  • Xiaoyue Sun
  • Liyuan Chen
  • Jia Li
  • Jinyuan ChenEmail author
  • Xiuzhen WeiEmail author
Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

Up to date, few attentions have been given to the special characterization of water-soluble inorganic ions (WSIs) in the submicron atmospheric particles. In this study, to implement a highly size-resolved characterization of WSIs in the submicron atmospheric particles, ten sets of size-segregated submicron atmospheric particles were collected in Hangzhou (China) from November to December 2015, with cut-off diameters of 0.060, 0.108, 0.170, 0.260, 0.400, 0.650, and 1.000 μm. The particulate WSIs, including Cl, NO3, SO42−, Na+, NH4+, K+, and Ca2+ were analyzed by ion chromatography, and their mode distributions and potential sources were assessed. It was found that the particulate WSIs constituted a substantial part (40.4~70.9%) in each fraction of submicron particles, of which the secondary inorganic ions (SO42−, NO3, and NH4+) were the dominant species. The sulfur oxidation rate (SOR) and nitrogen oxidation rate (NOR) were increased when the submicron particles became coarser, indicating the enhanced secondary formation processes of SO42− and NO3 in the coarser submicron particles, thus resulting in the higher fractional contribution of secondary inorganic aerosols in the coarser submicron atmospheric particles. The correlation coefficients between K+ and Cl, NO3, and SO42− were 0.9293 (P = 0.002), 0.9702 (P < 0.001), and 0.9723 (P < 0.001), suggesting their dominant contribution from the biomass burning. Furthermore, it was found that PM0.4–1 (aerodynamic diameter of 0.400–1.000 μm) was a substantial part (66.6%) of submicron atmospheric particles. Compared to PM0.4 (aerodynamic diameter ≤ 0.400 μm), the concentration of WSIs in PM0.4–1 was prominently higher, and the secondary formation processes of SO42− and NO3 in PM0.4–1 were significantly enhanced.

Keywords

Water-soluble inorganic ions Size-segregated Submicron atmospheric particles Secondary inorganic ions 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11869_2019_687_MOESM1_ESM.doc (45 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 45 kb)

References

  1. Albuquerque M, Coutinho M, Borrego C (2016) Long-term monitoring and seasonal analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) measured over a decade in the ambient air of Porto, Portugal. Sci Total Environ 543:439–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves CA, Pio CA, Duarte AC (2000) Particulate size distributed organic compounds in a forest atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 34:4287–4293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begam GR, Vachaspati CV, Ahammed YN, Kumar KR, Reddy RR, Sharma SK, Saxena M, Mandal TK (2017) Seasonal characteristics of water-soluble inorganic ions and carbonaceous aerosols in total suspended particulate matter at a rural semi-arid site, Kadapa (India). Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1719–1734.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7917-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behera SN, Sharma M (2010) Investigating the potential role of ammonia in ion chemistry of fine particulate matter formation for an urban environment. Sci Total Environ 408:3569–3575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Cao J, Zhao J, Xu H, Arimoto R, Wang G, Han Y, Shen Z, Li G (2014) n-Alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in total suspended particulates from the southeastern Tibetan Plateau: concentrations, seasonal variations, and sources. Sci Total Environ 470-471:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng SH, Yang LX, Zhou XH, Xue LK, Gao XM, Zhou Y, Wang WX (2011) Size-fractionated water-soluble ions, situ pH and water content in aerosol on hazy days and the influences on visibility impairment in Jinan, China. Atmos Environ 45:4631–4640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Đorđević D, Mihajlidi-Zelić A, Relić D, Ignjatović L, Huremović J, Stortini AM, Gambaro A (2012) Size-segregated mass concentration and water soluble inorganic ions in an urban aerosol of the Central Balkans (Belgrade). Atmos Environ 46:309–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galindo N, Yubero E (2017) Day-night variability of water-soluble ions in PM10 samples collected at a traffic site in southeastern Spain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:805–812.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7836-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonçalves C, Figueiredo BR, Alves CA, Cardoso AA, Vicente AM (2016) Size-segregated aerosol chemical composition from an agro-industrial region of São Paulo state, Brazil. Air Qual Atmos Health 10:483–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-016-0441-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hays MD, Fine PM, Geron CD, Kleeman MJ, Gullett BK (2005) Open burning of agricultural biomass: physical and chemical properties of particle-phase emissions. Atmos Environ 39:6747–6764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hinds WC (1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, second ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.065
  12. Huang M, Hao L, Gu X, Hu C, Zhao W, Wang Z, Fang L, Zhang W (2013) Effects of inorganic seed aerosols on the growth and chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol formed from OH-initiated oxidation of toluene. J Atmos Chem 70:151–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-013-9262-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang K, Zhuang G, Wang Q, Fu JS, Lin Y, Liu T, Han L, Deng C (2014) Extreme haze pollution in Beijing during January 2013: chemical characteristics, formation mechanism and role of fog processing. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 14:7517–7556.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-7517-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang X, Liu Z, Zhang J, Wen T, Ji D, Wang Y (2016) Seasonal variation and secondary formation of size-segregated aerosol water-soluble inorganic ions during pollution episodes in Beijing. Atmos Res 168:70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang S, Mayewski PA, Qin D, Sneed SA, Ren J, Zhang D (2004) Seasonal differences in snow chemistry from the vicinity of Mt. Everest, Central Himalayas. Atmos Environ 38:2819–2829.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong S, Ji Y, Liu L, Chen L, Zhao X, Wang J, Bai Z, Sun Z (2013) Spatial and temporal variation of phthalic acid esters (PAEs) in atmospheric PM10 and PM2.5 and the influence of ambient temperature in Tianjin, China. Atmos Environ 74:199–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ladji R, Yassaa N, Balducci C, Cecinato A (2013) Particle size distribution of n-alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS) in urban and industrial aerosol of Algiers, Algeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:1819–1832.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2074-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Wang L, Ji D, Wen T, Pan Y, Sun Y, Wang Y (2013) Characterization of the size-segregated water-soluble inorganic ions in the Jing-Jin-Ji urban agglomeration: spatial/temporal variability, size distribution and sources. Atmos Environ 77:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li L, Yin Y, Kong S, Wen B, Chen K, Yuan L, Li Q (2014) Altitudinal effect to the size distribution of water soluble inorganic ions in PM at Huangshan, China. Atmos Environ 98:242–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li K, Chen L, White SJ, Zheng X, Lv B, Lin C, Bao Z, Wu X, Gao X, Ying F, Shen J, Azzi M, Cen K (2018) Chemical characteristics and sources of PM1 during the 2016 summer in Hangzhou. Environ Pollut 232:42–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin JJ, Lee L-C (2004) Characterization of n-alkanes in urban submicron aerosol particles (PM1). Atmos Environ 38:2983–2991.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu J, Wu D, Fan S, Mao X, Chen H (2017a) A one-year, on-line, multi-site observational study on water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2.5 over the Pearl River Delta region, China. Sci Total Environ 601-602:1720–1732.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Z, Xie Y, Hu B, Wen T, Xin J, Li X, Wang Y (2017b) Size-resolved aerosol water-soluble ions during the summer and winter seasons in Beijing: formation mechanisms of secondary inorganic aerosols. Chemosphere 183:119–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meng CC, Wang LT, Zhang FF, Wei Z, Ma SM, Ma X, Yang J (2016) Characteristics of concentrations and water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2.5 in Handan City, Hebei province, China. Atmos Res 171:133–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Okada K, Ikegami M, Zaizen Y, Makino Y, Jensen JB, Gras JL (2001) The mixture state of individual aerosol particles in the 1997 Indonesian haze episode. J Aerosol Sci 32:1269–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park EH, Heo J, Hirakura S, Hashizume M, Deng F, Kim H, Yi S-M (2018) Characteristics of PM2.5 and its chemical constituents in Beijing, Seoul, and Nagasaki. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:1167–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0616-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun Y, Zhuang G, Tang A, Wang Y, An Z (2006) Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 in haze-fog episodes in Beijing. Environ Sci Technol 40:3148–3155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun Y, Jiang Q, Wang Z, Fu P, Li J, Yang T, Yin Y (2014) Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution in Beijing in January 2013. J Geophys Res-Atmo 119:4380–4398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tan J, Duan J, He K, Ma Y, Duan F, Chen Y, Fu J (2009) Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 during a typical haze episode in Guangzhou. J Environ Sci 21:774–781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62340-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taneepanichskul N, Gelaye B, Grigsby-Toussaint DS, Lohsoonthorn V, Jimba M, Williams MA (2018) Short-term effects of particulate matter exposure on daily mortality in Thailand: a case-crossover study. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:639–647.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0571-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tao Y, Ye X, Ma Z, Xie Y, Wang R, Chen J, Yang X, Jiang S (2016) Insights into different nitrate formation mechanisms from seasonal variations of secondary inorganic aerosols in Shanghai. Atmos Environ 145:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tian YZ, Shi GL, Han SQ, Zhang YF, Feng YC, Liu GR, Gao LJ, Wu JH, Zhu T (2013) Vertical characteristics of levels and potential sources of water-soluble ions in PM10 in a Chinese megacity. Sci Total Environ 447:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai JH, Tsai SM, Wang WC, Chiang HL (2016) Water-soluble ionic species of coarse and fine particulate matter and gas precursor characteristics at urban and rural sites of Central Taiwan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:16722–16737.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6834-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vieira-Filho M, Pedrotti JJ, Fornaro A (2016) Water-soluble ions species of size-resolved aerosols: implications for the atmospheric acidity in São Paulo megacity, Brazil. Atmos Res 181:281–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Voutsa D, Samara C, Manoli E, Lazarou D, Tzoumaka P (2014) Ionic composition of PM2.5 at urban sites of northern Greece: secondary inorganic aerosol formation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4995–5006.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2445-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang Y, Zhuang G, Tang A, Yuan H, Sun Y, Chen S, Zheng A (2005) The ion chemistry and the source of PM2.5 aerosol in Beijing. Atmos Environ 39:3771–3784.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang G, Li J, Cheng C, Hu S, Xie M, Gao S, Zhou B, Dai W, Cao J, An Z (2011) Observation of atmospheric aerosols at Mt. Hua and Mt. Tai in central and East China during spring 2009—part 1: EC, OC and inorganic ions. Atmos Chem Phys 11:4221–4235.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4221-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang X, Wang W, Yang L, Gao X, Nie W, Yu Y, Xu P, Zhou Y, Wang Z (2012) The secondary formation of inorganic aerosols in the droplet mode through heterogeneous aqueous reactions under haze conditions. Atmos Environ 63:68–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang Q, Ma Y, Tan J, Zheng N, Duan J, Sun Y, He K, Zhang Y (2015) Characteristics of size-fractionated atmospheric metals and water-soluble metals in two typical episodes in Beijing. Atmos Environ 119:294–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang Y, Zhou R, Wu J, Yu Y, Ma Z, Zhang L, Ya D (2015) Seasonal variations and size distributions of water-soluble ions in atmospheric aerosols in Beijing, 2012. J Environ Sci 34:197–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang Y, Zhou R, Yan Y, Yu Y, Liu J, Ya D, Du Z, Wu D (2016) Seasonal variations and size distributions of water-soluble ions of atmospheric particulate matter at Shigatse, Tibetan Plateau. Chemosphere 145:560–567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ye X, Ma Z, Hu D, Yang X, Chen J (2011) Size-resolved hygroscopicity of submicrometer urban aerosols in Shanghai during wintertime. Atmos Res 99:353–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yin L, Niu Z, Chen X, Chen J, Zhang F, Xu L (2014) Characteristics of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 in the coastal urban agglomeration along the Western Taiwan Strait Region, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:5141–5156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2134-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yue H, Yun Y, Gao R, Li G, Sang N (2015) Winter polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-bound particulate matter from Peri-urban North China promotes lung cancer cell metastasis. Environ Sci Technol 49:14484–14493.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es506280c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang L, Vet R, Wiebe A, Mihele C, Sukloff B, Chan E, Moran MD, Iqbal S (2008) Characterization of the size-segregated water-soluble inorganic ions at eight Canadian rural sites. Atmos Chem Phys 8:7133–7151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang Y, Obrist D, Zielinska B, Gertler A (2013) Particulate emissions from different types of biomass burning. Atmos Environ 72:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang J, Tong L, Huang Z, Zhang H, He M, Dai X, Zheng J, Xiao H (2018) Seasonal variation and size distributions of water-soluble inorganic ions and carbonaceous aerosols at a coastal site in Ningbo, China. Sci Total Environ 639:793–803.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou Q, Liu B, Chen Y, Han X, Wei X, Zhu Y, Zhou X, Chen J (2017) Characterization of PAHs in size-fractionated submicron atmospheric particles and their association with the intracellular oxidative stress. Chemosphere 182:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zou Y, Wu Y, Wang Y, Li Y, Jin C (2017) Physicochemical properties, in vitro cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of PM1.0 and PM2.5 from Shanghai, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:19508–19516.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9626-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zwozdziak A, Sówka I, Willak-Janc E, Zwozdziak J, Kwiecińska K, Balińska-Miśkiewicz W (2016) Influence of PM1 and PM2.5 on lung function parameters in healthy schoolchildren—a panel study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:23892–23901.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7605-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology for Industrial Pollution Control of Zhejiang Province, College of EnvironmentZhejiang University of TechnologyHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Tea Research InstituteChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations