Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 491–502 | Cite as

Modeling air quality impact of pollutants emitted by an oil/gas plant in complex terrain in view of a health impact assessment

  • Cristina MangiaEmail author
  • Andrea Bisignano
  • Marco Cervino
  • Luca Mortarini
  • Silvia Trini Castelli
Article
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

The present study focuses on the estimation of the air quality impact of an oil/gas pre-treatment plant, the Centro Olio Val d’Agri (COVA), in view of a more comprehensive epidemiological study regarding the inhabitants of two small towns settled in close proximity of the plant. We used the RMS (RAMS/MIRS/SPRAY) modeling system to estimate the ground level concentration of SO2, NOx, and CO as a result of the incineration of residues and electric and thermic power generation. Simulations were run for 1 meteorological year. The spatial interpolation of measured H2S, proxy of the other types of emission, allowed for a more detailed picture of the plant impact. The spatial correlation between estimated NOx and SO2 and measured H2S strengthens the hypothesis of exploiting NOx maps as a proxy for the population exposure to the mixture of industry-emitted pollutants. Overall results suggest that the plant affects the inhabitants of the two towns differently. Furthermore, the simulations show that the area impacted by the plumes is much larger than that of the two municipalities within range of the plant, suggesting both the need to extend the monitoring area and to include the population living in that area in the health study.

Keywords

Exposure assessment Oil/gas pre-treatment Dispersion modeling Complex terrain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was partially funded by the Comune di Viggiano e Grumento Nova. Many thanks to the colleagues from CNR-IFC co-partner in the project for helpful discussion and fruitful collaboration. The authors thank the ENI and Arpa Basilicata for supplying environmental data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11869_2019_675_MOESM1_ESM.docx (8.4 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 8634 kb)

References

  1. Bustaffa E, Demarinis AML, Farella G, Petraccone S, De Gennaro G, Bianchi F (2016) Atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbons near plants of crude oil first treatment. Epidemiol Prev 40(5):290–306Google Scholar
  2. Calvello M, Esposito F, Trippetta S (2014) An integrated approach for the evaluation of technological hazard impacts on air quality: the case of the Val d’Agri oil/gas plant. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14(8):2133–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carvalho J, Anfossi D, Trini Castelli S, Degrazia GA (2002) Application of a model system for the study of transport and diffusion in complex terrain to the TRACT experiment. Atmos Environ 36:1147–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cotton WR, Pielke RA, Walko R, Liston GE, Tremback CJ, Jiang H, McAnelly RL, Harrington RL, Nicholls ME (2003) RAMS 2001 - current status and future directions. Meteorog Atmos Phys 82:5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dionisio KL, Baxter LK, Burke J, Özkaynak H (2016) The importance of the exposure metric in air pollution epidemiology studies: when does it matter, and why? Air Qual Atmos Health 9:495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. dos Santos Cerqueira J, de Albuquerque HN, de Sousa FDAS (2018) Atmospheric pollutants: modeling with Aermod software. Air Qual Atmos Health 12:1Google Scholar
  7. Gianicolo EAL, Mangia C, Cervino M (2016) Investigating mortality heterogeneity among neighbourhoods of a highly industrialised Italian city: a meta-regression approach. Int J Public Health 61(7):777–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gross G (1994) Statistical evaluation of the mesoscale model results. In: Pielke RA and Pearce RT (eds) Mesoscale Modeling of the Atmosphere, Meteorol. Monogr. Vol. 25, N. 47, Am. Meteorol. Soc., Boston (USA), pp 137–154Google Scholar
  9. Hanna SR, Strimaitis DG (1990) Rugged terrain effects on diffusion. In Atmospheric processes over complex terrain (Ed. W Blumen), meteorological monographs of the American Meteorological Society, 23, Boston, pp 109–144Google Scholar
  10. Kleczek MA, Steeneveld GJ, Holtslag AM (2014) Evaluation of the weather research and forecasting mesoscale model for GABLS3: impact of boundary-layer schemes, boundary conditions and spin-up. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 152:213–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luong C, Zhang K (2017) An assessment of emission event trends within the greater Houston area during 2003–2013. Air Qual Atmos Health 10(5):543–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mangia C, Cervino M, Gallimbeni R (2012) Modelling the air quality impact of industrial emissions over a valley in Southern Italy. Int J Environ Pollut 50(1/2/3/4):264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oettl D, Sturm P, Anfossi D, Trini Castelli S, Lercher P, Tinarelli G, Pittini T (2007) Lagrangian particle model simulation to assess air quality along the Brenner transit corridor through the Alps. Air pollution modeling and its applications XVIII. Developments in environmental science, Borrego C. and Renner E. Eds, Elsevier Publishers, vol 6: 689–697Google Scholar
  14. Pielke RA, Cotton WR, Walko RL, Tremback CJ, Lyons WA, Grasso LD, Nicholls ME, Moran MD, Wesley DA, Lee TJ, Copeland JH (1992) A comprehensive meteorological modeling system - RAMS. Meteorog Atmos Phys 49:69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sansigolo Kerr AF, Anfossi D, Costa Carvalho J, Trini Castelli S (2001) A dispersion study of the aerosol emitted by fertilizer plants in the region of Serra do Mar Sierra, Cubatao, Brazil. Int J Environ Pollut 16:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Svensson G, Holtslag A, Kumar V, Mauritsen T, Steeneveld G, Angevine W, Bazile E, Beljaars A, Bruijn E, Cheng A, Conangla L, Cuxart J, Ek M, Falk M, Freedman F, Kitagawa H, Larson V, Lock A, Mailhot J, Masson V, Park S, Pleim J, Söderberg S, Weng W, Zampieri M (2011) Evaluation of the diurnal cycle in the atmospheric boundary layer over land as represented by a variety of single-column models: the second GABLS experiment. Bound-Layer Meteorol 140(2):177–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tinarelli G, Anfossi D, Bider M, Ferrero E, Trini Castelli S (2000) A new high performance version of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model SPRAY, some case studies. Air Pollution Modelling and its Application XIII, Gryning S.E.and Batchvarova E. Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 23, 499–506. ISBN: 0–306–46188-9Google Scholar
  18. Trini Castelli S (2000) MIRS: a turbulence parameterisation model interfacing RAMS and SPRAY in a transport and diffusion modelling system. Internal Report. ICGF/C.N.R. No 412/2000Google Scholar
  19. Trini Castelli S (2008) Integrated modelling at CNR/ISAC Torino. Section 4.8.3 in Overview of Existing Integrated (off-line and on-line) Mesoscale Meteorological and Chemical Transport Modelling Systems in Europe. Joint Report of COST Action 728 and GURME”. Baklanov A., Fay B., Kaminski J. and Sokhi. Eds. GAW Report No. 177. World Meteorological Organization and COST Office PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  20. Trini Castelli S, Anfossi D, Ferrero E (2003) Evaluation of the environmental impact of two different heating scenarios in urban area. Int J Environ Pollut 20:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Trini Castelli S, Anfossi D, Finardi S (2010) Simulations of the dispersion from a waste incinerator in the Turin area in three different meteorological scenarios. Int J Environ Pollut 40:10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trini Castelli S, Belfiore G, Anfossi D, Elampe E, Clemente M (2011) Modelling the meteorology and traffic pollutant dispersion in highly complex terrain: the ALPNAP alpine space project. Int J Environ Pollut 44:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trippetta S, Caggiano T, Telesca L (2013) Analysis of particulate matter in anthropized areas characterized by the presence of crude oil pre-treatment plants: the case study of the Agri Valley (Southern Italy). Atmos Environ 77:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Varvayanni M, Bartzis JG, Catsaros N, Graziani G, Deligiannis P (1998) Numerical simulation of daytime mesoscale flow over highly complex terrain: Alps case. Atmos Environ 32:1301–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Mangia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Bisignano
    • 2
  • Marco Cervino
    • 3
  • Luca Mortarini
    • 2
  • Silvia Trini Castelli
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and ClimateNational Research Council of ItalyLecceItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and ClimateNational Research Council of ItalyTurinItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council of ItalyBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations