Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 643–652 | Cite as

Modelling indoor air quality: validation and sensitivity

  • S. Silva
  • A. Monteiro
  • M. A. Russo
  • J. Valente
  • C. Alves
  • T. Nunes
  • C. Pio
  • A. I. Miranda
Article

Abstract

The main objective of this work is to extend the knowledge of indoor air quality by using a numerical tool to calculate the concentrations of pollutants in the indoor air of a classroom. The application of a numerical model allowed to quantitatively assess the impact of several proposed improvement measures, through the simulation of scenarios.

The numerical model CONTAM was used to characterise the indoor air quality in a classroom of an elementary school, in terms of concentrations of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and particulate matter. The results of the CONTAM simulations were compared to measurements performed during monitoring campaigns (SINPHONIE project). The simulated and measured carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide concentrations inside the classroom are in good agreement. Furthermore, for particulate matter, simulated values show a significant difference from measured values, which are higher overall. With the goal of maximising the indoor air quality of the classroom, several alternative scenarios were simulated. The door and windows of the classroom were opened or closed at different times for each scenario. The scenario promoting the best indoor air quality (i.e. with the lowest concentrations of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide) is the one in which the door is only open to allow students to get in and out of the room, and the window is kept half-open during the entire day.

Keywords

Indoor air quality Modelling CONTAM Schools Human health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due, for the financial support, to CESAM (UID/AMB/50017), to FCT/MEC through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007638), within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020. The authors are also grateful to the Directorate General for Health and Consumer Affairs (DG SANCO) for funding the SINPHONIE project.

References

  1. Abidin E, Semple S, Rasdi I, Norkhadijah S, Ismail S, Ayres J (2014) The relationship between air pollution and asthma in Malaysian school children. Air Qual Atmos Health 7:421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal N, Nagendra S (2016) Modelling of particulate matters distribution inside the multilevel urban classrooms in tropical climate for exposure assessment. Build Environ 102:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albuquerque M, Coutinho M, Borrego C (2016) Long-term monitoring and seasonal analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) measured over a decade in the ambient air of Porto, Portugal. Sci Total Environ 543:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almeida SM, Canha N, Silva A, Do Carmo Freitas M, Pegas P, Alves C, Evtyugina M, Pio C (2011) Children exposure to atmospheric particles in indoor of Lisbon primary schools. Atmos Environ 45(40):7594–7599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alves C, Nunes T, Silva J, Duarte M (2013) Comfort parameters and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in school classrooms and outdoor air. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13:1521–1535Google Scholar
  6. Borrego C, Tchepel O (2000) Quality assurance/quality control in atmospheric modelling. Proceedings of the International IGBP Seminar on “Global Change: Biophysical and Socio-economical Impact”, Aveiro, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradman A, Gaspar F, Castorina R, Williams J, Hoang T, Jenkins PL, McKone TE, Maddalena R (2016) Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure and risk characterization in California early childhood education environments. Indoor Air. doi: 10.1111/ina.12283 Google Scholar
  8. Broome RA, Fann N, Cristina TJN, Fulcher C, Duc H, Morgan GG (2015) The health benefits of reducing air pollution in Sydney, Australia. Environ Res 143:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carslaw N (2007) A new detailed chemical model for indoor air pollution. Atmos Environ 41(6):1164–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dols W S, Polidoro B J (2015) CONTAM user guide and program documentation—version 3.2 (NIST Technical Note 1887)Google Scholar
  11. Dongarrà G, Manno E, Varrica D, Lombardo M, Vultaggio M (2010) Study on ambient concentrations of PM10, PM10–2.5, PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants. Trace elements and chemical speciation of atmospheric particulates. Atmos Environ 44(39):5244–5257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallego E, Roca X, Perales JF, Guardino X (2009) Determining indoor air quality and identifying the origin of odour episodes in indoor environments. J Environ Sci 21:333–339Google Scholar
  13. Geiss O, Tirendi S, Bernasconi C, Barrero J, Gotti A, Cimino-reale G, Casati B, Marafante E, Sarigiannis D (2008) European Parliament Pilot Project on Exposure to Indoor Air Chemicals and Possible Health Risks Final Report. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. ISBN 978-92-79-08184-2Google Scholar
  14. Gulia S, Shiva Nagendra SM, Khare M, Khanna I (2015) Urban air quality management—a review. Atmos Pollut Res 6(2):286–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo Z (2000) Simulation Tool Kit for Indoor Air Quality and Inhalation Exposure (Iaqx) Version 1.0 User’s GuideGoogle Scholar
  16. Jardim D, Diegues P, Santiago A, Matias P, Reis V, Matos J, Anacleto T, Cano M, Nogueira A, Capucho M, Gomes P, Francisco S (2015) Metodologia de avaliação da qualidade do ar interior em edifícios de comércio e serviços no âmbito da Portaria 353-A / 2013. Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente and Direção Geral da SaúdeGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim JL, Elfman L, Wieslander G, Ferm M, Torén K, Norbäck D (2011) Respiratory health among Korean pupils in relation to home, school and outdoor environment. J Korean Med Sci 26(2):166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendez M, Blond N, Blondeau P, Schoemaecker C, Hauglustaine DA (2015) Assessment of the impact of oxidation processes on indoor air pollution using the new time-resolved INCA-Indoor model. Atmos Environ 122:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miao Q, Chen D, Buzzelli M, Aronson KJ (2015) Environmental equity research: review with focus on outdoor air pollution research methods and analytic tools. Arch Environ Occup H 70(1):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Missia DA, Demetriou E, Michael N, Tolis EI, Bartzis JG (2010) Indoor exposure from building materials: a field study. Atmos Environ 44:4388–4395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pegas PN, Nunes T, Alves CA, Silva JR, Vieira SLA, Caseiro A, Pio CA (2012) Indoor and outdoor characterisation of organic and inorganic compounds in city centre and suburban elementary schools of Aveiro, Portugal. Atmos Environ 55:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quian J, Ferro AR, Fowler KR (2008) Estimating the resuspension rate and residence time of indoor particles. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 58(4):502–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. RCESE (2006) Regulamento dos Sistemas Energéticos de Climatização de Edifícios (National System for Energy and Indoor Air Quality Certification of Buildings). Decreto-Lei n° 79/2006, Ministério das Obras Públicas, Transportes e Comunicações, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  24. Rumchev K, Ourangui R, Bertolatti D, Spickett J (2007) Indoor air quality in old and new schools. WIT Tr Biomed Health 11:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Santos J C (2010) Avaliação da Qualidade do ar interior em jardins-de-infância. Dissertação apresentada para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Engenharia de Segurança e Higiene Ocupacionais da Engenharia da Universidade do PortoGoogle Scholar
  26. Saraga DE, Volanis L, Maggos T, Vasilakos C, Bairachtari K, Helmis CG (2014) Workplace personal exposure to respirable PM fraction: a study in sixteen indoor environments. Atmos Pollut Res 5:431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schweizer C, Edwards R, Bayer-Oglesby L, Gauderman W, Ilacqua V, Jantunen MJ, Lai H, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Künzli N (2007) Indoor time-microenvironment-activity patterns in seven regions of Europe. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 17(2):170–181Google Scholar
  28. Siddique S, Ray M, Lahiri T (2011) Effects of air pollution on the respiratory health of children: a study in the capital city of India. Air Qual Atmos Health 4:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith K (2008) WHO air quality guidelines: moving indoors. Air Qual Atmos Health 1:17–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solomon P, Costantini M, Grahame J, Gerlofs-Nijland M, Cassee F, Russell A, Brook J, Hopke P, Hidy G, Phalen R, Saldiva P, Sarnat S, Balmes J, Tager I, Özkaynak H, Vedal S, Wierman S, Costa D (2012) Air pollution and health: bridging the gap from sources to health outcomes: conference summary. Air Qual Atmos Health 5(1):9–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thatcher TL, Layton DW (1995) Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence. Atmos Environ 29(13):1487–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. USEPA (1989) Report to Congress on indoor air quality. Volume 2: assessment and control of indoor air pollution. Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  33. WHO (2010) Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality. Selected Pollutants. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (Vol. 9), ISBN 9789289002134, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang W, Sohn J, Kim J, Son B, Park J (2009) Indoor air quality investigation according to age of the school buildings in Korea. J Environ Manag 90:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CESAM, Department of Environment and PlanningUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations