Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 273–281 | Cite as

Volatile emissions from common consumer products

Article

Abstract

Consumer products emit a range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can affect air quality and health. Risk reduction is hindered because of lack of information about specific product emissions. This study investigates and compares VOCs emitted from 37 common products (air fresheners, laundry products, cleaners, and personal care products), including those with certifications and claims of green and organic. It extends a prior study of 25 consumer products by adding 12 more products, including fragrance-free versions of fragranced products, representing the first such comparison in the scientific literature. This study found 156 different VOCs emitted from the 37 products, with an average of 15 VOCs per product. Of these 156 VOCs, 42 VOCs are classified as toxic or hazardous under US federal laws, and each product emitted at least one of these chemicals. Emissions of carcinogenic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from green fragranced products were not significantly different from regular fragranced products. The most common chemicals in fragranced products were terpenes, which were not in fragrance-free versions. Of the volatile ingredients emitted, fewer than 3 % were disclosed on any product label or material safety data sheet (MSDS). Because health effects depend on many factors, not only individual ingredients, this study makes no claims regarding possible risks. However, knowledge of product composition can be an important step to understand, assess, and reduce potential exposures and effects.

Keywords

Consumer products VOC emissions Fragrance Fragrance free Green 

Supplementary material

11869_2015_327_MOESM1_ESM.doc (638 kb)
Supplementary Table 1(DOC 638 kb)
11869_2015_327_MOESM2_ESM.docx (71 kb)
Supplementary Table 2(DOCX 45 kb)
11869_2015_327_MOESM3_ESM.docx (50 kb)
Supplementary Table 3(DOCX 35 kb)
11869_2015_327_MOESM4_ESM.docx (57 kb)
Supplementary Table 4(DOCX 37 kb)
11869_2015_327_MOESM5_ESM.docx (66 kb)
Supplementary Table 5(DOCX 44 kb)

References

  1. (EPA) Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Technical background document to support rulemaking pursuant to the Clean Air Act, section 112(g), ranking of pollutants with respect to hazard to human health, EPA-450/3-92-010; 1994Google Scholar
  2. (EPA) Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air collected in specially-prepared canisters and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Method TO-15. Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air. EPA/625/R-96/010b. 2nd ed. Cincinnati: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  3. (EPA) Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. EPA/630/P-03/001F. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, MarchGoogle Scholar
  4. (EPA) Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Prioritized chronic dose–response values for screening risk assessments, Table 1. (http://www2.epa.gov/fera/dose-response-assessment-assessing-health-risks-associated-exposure-hazardous-air-pollutants)
  5. (EWG) Environmental Working Group (2014a) EWG’s guide to healthy cleaning, ratings http://www.ewg.org/guides/cleaners
  6. (EWG) Environmental Working Group (2014b) Skin Deep Database, ratings http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/
  7. Chen J, Luo D (2012) Ozone formation potentials of organic compounds from different emission sources in the South Coast Air Basin of California. Atmos Environ 55:448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper SD, Raymer JH, Pellizzari ED, Thomas KW, Castillo NP, Maewall S (1992) Polar organic compounds in fragrances of consumer products. Final Report, Contract # 68-02-4544. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPAGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahl R (2010) Greenwashing: do you know what you’re buying? Environ Health Perspect 118:a246–a252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodson RE, Nishioka M, Standley LJ, Perovich LJ, Brody JG, Rudel RA (2012) Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ Health Perspect 120:935–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards RD, Schweizer C, Llacqua V, Lai HK, Jantunen M, Bayer-Oglesby L, Künzli N (2006) Time–activity relationships to VOC personal exposure factors. Atmos Environ 40(29):5685–5700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geiss O, Giannopoulos G, Tirendi S, Barrero-Moreno J, Larsen BR, Kotzias D (2011) The AIRMEX study—VOC measurements in public buildings and schools/kindergartens in eleven European cities: statistical analysis of the data. Atmos Environ 45(22):3676–3684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldsmith MR, Grulke CM, Brooks RD, Transue TR, Tan YM, Frame A, Egeghy PP, Edwards R, Chang DT, Tornero-Velez R, Isaacs K, Wang A, Johnson J, Holm K, Reich M, Mitchell J, Vallero D, Phillips L, Phillips M, Wambaugh JF, Judson RS, Buckley TJ, Dary CC (2014) Development of a consumer product ingredient database for chemical exposure screening and prioritization. Food Chem Toxicol 65:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. GoodGuide (2014) GoodGuide consumer products reviews and ratings, http://www.goodguide.com
  15. Green Seal (2014) Product certification standards, http://www.greenseal.org
  16. Jo W-K, Lee J-H, Kim M-K (2008) Head-space, small-chamber and in-vehicle tests for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from air fresheners for the Korean market. Chemosphere 70:1827–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kwon K-D, Jo W-K, Lim H-J, Jeong W-S (2007) Characterization of emissions composition for selected household products available in Korea. J Hazard Mater 148:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maisey SJ, Saunders SM, West N, Franklin PJ (2013) An extended baseline examination of indoor VOCs in a city of low ambient pollution: Perth, Western Australia. Atmos Environ 81:546–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell J, Arnot JA, Jolliet O, Georgopoulos PG, Isukapalli S, Dasgupta S, Pandian M, Wambaugh J, Egeghy P, Cohen Hubal EA, Vallero DA (2013) Comparison of modeling approaches to prioritize chemicals based on estimates of exposure and exposure potential. Sci Total Environ 458–460:555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nazaroff WW, Weschler CJ (2004) Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants. Atmos Environ 38(18):2841–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rastogi SC, Heydorn S, Johansen JD, Basketter DA (2001) Fragrance chemicals in domestic and occupational products. Contact Dermatitis 45(4):221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rossignol S, Rio C, Ustache A, Fable S, Nicolle J, Même A, D’Anna B, Nicolas M, Leoz E, Chiappini L (2013) The use of a housecleaning product in an indoor environment leading to oxygenated polar compounds and SOA formation: gas and particulate phase chemical characterization. Atmos Environ 75:196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sack TM, Steele DH, Hammerstrom K, Remmers J (1992) A survey of household products for volatile organic compounds. Atmos Environ 26A(6):1063–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarigiannis DA, Karakitsios SP, Gotti A, Liakos IL, Katsoyiannis A (2011) Exposure to major volatile organic compounds and carbonyls in European indoor environments and associated health risk. Environ Int 37(4):743–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scruggs CE, Ortolano L (2011) Creating safer consumer products: the information challenges companies face. Environ Sci Pol 14(6):605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singer BC, Coleman BK, Destaillats H, Hodgson AT, Lundin MM, Weschler CJ, Nazaroff WW (2006) Indoor secondary pollutants from cleaning product and air freshener use in the presence of ozone. Atmos Environ 40(35):6696–6710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Somogyi L, Janshekar H, Takei N (1998) Aroma chemicals and the fragrance and flavor industry. Stanford Research Institute International, CEH Review, p. 503.5000 FGoogle Scholar
  28. Steinemann AC (2009) Fragranced consumer products and undisclosed ingredients. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(1):32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steinemann A, Walsh N (2007) Environmental laws and exposure analysis. In: Ott W, Steinemann A, Wallace L (eds) Exposure analysis. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  30. Steinemann AC, MacGregor IC, Gordon SM, Gallagher LG, Davis AL, Ribeiro DS, Wallace LA (2011) Fragranced consumer products: chemicals emitted, ingredients unlisted. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(3):328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steinemann AC, Gallagher LG, Davis AL, MacGregor IC (2013) Chemical emissions from residential dryer vents during use of fragranced laundry products. Air Qual Atmos Health 6(1):151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wallace LA (1991) Comparison of risks from outdoor and indoor exposure to toxic chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 95:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wallace LA (2001) Assessing human exposure to volatile organic compounds. In: Spengler JD, McCarthy JF, Samet J (eds) Indoor air quality handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, Chapter 33Google Scholar
  34. Wallace LA, Nelson WC, Pellizzari E, Raymer JH, Thomas KW (1991) Identification of polar volatile organic compounds in consumer products and common microenvironments. Paper #91-62.4 presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC; JuneGoogle Scholar
  35. Weisel CP (2002) Assessing exposure to air toxics relative to asthma. Environ Health Perspect 110(Suppl 4):527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering, Sustainable Cities, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Melbourne School of EngineeringThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations