Use of free-standing filters in an asthma intervention study
- First Online:
This study characterizes the use of HEPA air filters provided to 89 households participating in an intervention study investigating the respiratory health of children with asthma. Free-standing filters were placed in the child's bedroom and monitored continuously for nearly a year in each household. Filter use was significantly affected by study phase, season, and monitoring week. During the “intensive” weeks when a community education worker and a field technician visited the household, the use rate averaged 70 ± 33 %. During season-long “non-intensive” periods between seasonal visits, use dropped to 34 ± 30 %. Filter use rapidly decreased during the 3 to 4 weeks following each intensive, and was slightly higher in spring, summer, and in the evening and at night when the child was likely to be home, although households did not follow consistent diurnal patterns. While participants expressed an understanding of the benefits of filter use and reported good experiences with them, use rates were low, particularly during unobserved non-intensive periods. The provision of free-standing air filters to individuals or households must be considered an active intervention that requires monitoring and evaluation; otherwise, unknown and unexpected patterns of filter use may alter and possibly bias results due to exposure misclassification.
KeywordsAir quality Behavior HEPA Indoor environment Intervention Exposure misclassification
- Brauner EV, Forchhammer L, Moller P, Barregard L, Gunnarsen L, Afshari A, Wahlin P, Glasius M, Dragsted LO, Basu S, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Loft S (2008) Indoor particles affect vascular function in the aged—an air filtration-based intervention study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177(4):419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, Ebrary I (2008) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Morgan WJ, Crain EF, Gruchalla RS, O'Connor GT, Kattan M, Evans RI, Stout J, Malindzak G, Smartt E, Plaut M, Walter M, Vaughn B, Mitchell H, G. Inner-City Asthma Study (2004) “Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma.”. N Engl J Med 351(11):1068–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morris RJ, Helm HJ, Schmid W, Hacker D (2006) A novel air filtration delivery system improves seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc 27(1):63–67Google Scholar
- Myatt TA, Minegishi T, Allen JG, MacIntosh DL (2008) Control of asthma triggers in indoor air with air cleaners: a modeling analysis. Environ Heal 7Google Scholar
- NHLBI (2007). “National Heart Lung and Blood Institute: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma (EPR-3).” http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/index.htm. Accessed 1 July 2013.
- O'Toole, A. R., E. Parker, S. Batterman, T. Robins, C. Godwin, S. Grant, L. Du, Z. Rowe and R. G. Lewis (2011). “Factors Affecting Air Filter Usage in Homes of Children with Asthma In Detroit, MI.” http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_MeetingAbstracts.A3905. Accessed 13–18 May 2011.
- Sulser C, Schulz G, Wagner P, Sommerfeld C, Keil T, Reich A, Wahn U, Lau S (2009) Can the use of HEPA cleaners in homes of asthmatic children and adolescents sensitized to cat and dog allergens decrease bronchial hyperresponsiveness and allergen contents in solid dust? Int Arch Allergy Immunol 148(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verrall B, Muir DCF, Wilson WM, Milner R, Johnston M, Dolovich J (1988) Laminar-flow air cleaner bed attachment—a controlled trial. Ann Allergy 61(2):117–122Google Scholar