Current Treatment Options in Oncology

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 473–486

Molecular research directions in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

  • Chi Tarn
  • Andrew K. Godwin
Article

Opinion statement

Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is an oral 2-phenylaminopyrimidine derivative that acts as a selective inhibitor against several receptor tyrosine kinases and has been viewed as one of the therapeutic success stories of the 21st century. Imatinib was first shown to inhibit the causative molecular translocation in chronic myelogenous leukemia, BCRABL. Because imatinib could also inhibit the activity of KIT, a 145-kD transmembrane glycoprotein, and because gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract, are characterized by expression of a gainof-function mutation in KIT, imatinib was used in therapeutic trials of GISTs beginning in 1999. The initial success has now resulted in more widespread use of imatinib for the treatment of patients with GIST. Molecular genetic studies have shown that most GISTs possess a KIT mutation in exon 9, 11, 13, or 17. Clinically, GIST patients with KIT exon 11 mutations (ie, the juxtamembrane region) are the most prevalent and sensitive to imatinib. In addition to the inhibitory effect on KIT, imatinib also inhibits the activity of mutant platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα) found in a subset of GIST. What is becoming evident is that there are patients with GIST who lack mutations in KIT or PDGFRα, or possess “imatinib-resistant” mutations (such as exon 17 mutations in KIT and exon 18 mutations in PDGFRα). These patients typically do not respond well to imatinib therapy. Therefore, identifying additional genetic factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of GIST, independent of KIT and PDGFRα, will be important in developing additional anti-GIST therapies. As one might suspect from previous experiences with antitumor therapies, primary and secondary resistance to imatinib is also becoming a major clinical problem in the treatment of this disease. Therefore, new drugs that can serve as alternative therapies in imatinibresistant patients with GIST or that can be used in combination with imatinib will be needed. As with most recent efforts to derive novel molecular target therapies to treat cancer, improved therapy of GIST will continue to benefit from advances in the molecular characterization of this disease.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, et al.: Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT):gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 1998, 152: 1259–1269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sarlomo-Rikala M, Kovatich AJ, Barusevicius A, et al.: CD117:a sensitive marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors that is more specific than CD34. Mod Pathol 1998, 11: 728–734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Besmer P, Murphy JE, George PC, et al.: A new acute transforming feline retrovirus and relationship of its oncogene v-kit with the protein kinase gene family. Nature 1986, 320: 415–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yarden Y, Escobedo JA, Kuang WJ, et al.: Structure of the receptor for platelet-derived growth factor helps define a family of closely related growth factor receptors. Nature 1986, 323: 226–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coussens L, VanBeveren C, Smith D, et al.: Structural alteration of viral homologue of receptor protooncogene fms at carboxyl terminus. Nature 1986, 320: 277–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosnet O, Schiff C, Pebusque MJ, et al.: Human FLT3/ FLK2 gene:cDNA cloning and expression in hematopoietic cells. Blood 1993, 82: 1110–1119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Small D, Levenstein M, Kim E, et al.: STK-1, the human homolog of Flk-2/Flt-3, is selectively expressed in CD34+ human bone marrow cells and is involved in the proliferation of early progenitor/stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994, 91: 459–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rousset D, Agnes F, Lachaume P, et al.: Molecular evolution of the genes encoding receptor tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like domains. J Mol Evol 1995, 41: 421–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, et al.: Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 1998, 279: 577–580. This is the first report of KIT mutations in GISTs, suggesting that the mutations contribute to tumor development.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, et al.: PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 2003, 299: 708–710. This study demonstrated that a subset of KIT mutation-negative GISTs possesses gain-of-function mutations in PDGFRα, indicating that a mutation in KIT or PDGFRα is sufficient to induce GIST tumorigenesis.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medeiros F, Corless CL, Duensing A, et al.: KIT-negative gastrointestinal stromal tumors:proof of concept and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg Pathol 2004, 28: 889–894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Rifai W, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Andersson LC, et al.: DNA sequence copy number changes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors:tumor progression and prognostic significance. Cancer Res 2000, 60: 3899–3903. DNA copy number change was found to be related to benign, primary metastatic, and malignant stages of GIST. It was suggested that the DNA copy number can be used as a prognostic marker for GIST progression.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crosby JA, Catton CN, Davis A, et al.: Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine:a review of 50 cases from a prospective database. Ann Surg Oncol 2001, 8: 50–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nishida T, Hirota S: Biological and clinical review of stromal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Histol Histopathol 2000, 15: 1293–1301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Corless CL, Fletcher JA, Heinrich MC: Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22: 3813–3825.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Sarlomo-Rikala M: Immuno-histochemical spectrum of GISTs at different sites and their differential diagnosis with a reference to CD117 (KIT). Mod Pathol 2000, 13: 1134–1142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miettinen M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors-definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch 2001, 438: 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Von Mehren M: Imatinib-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors:the clinical problem and therapeutic strategies. Curr Oncol Rep 2006, In press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirota S, Nishida T, Isozaki K, et al.: Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with dysphagia and novel type germline mutation of KIT gene. Gastroenterology 2002, 122: 1493–1499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsujimura T, Furitsu T, Morimoto M, et al.: Ligand-independent activation of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase in a murine mastocytoma cell line P-815 generated by a point mutation. Blood 1994, 83: 2619–2626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sommer G, Agosti V, Ehlers I, et al.: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a mouse model by targeted mutation of the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100: 6706–6711. First genetically engineered murine model of GIST.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heinrich MC, Griffith DJ, Druker BJ, et al.: Inhibition of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase activity by STI 571, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Blood 2000, 96: 925–932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kitamura Y, Hirota S, Nishida T: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST):a model for molecule-based diagnosis and treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Sci 2003, 94: 315–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tarn C, Merkel E, Canutescu AA, et al.: Analysis of KIT mutations in sporadic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors:therapeutic implications through protein modeling. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11: 3668–3677. Protein modeling and structural analyses were used to elucidate why patients with GISTs with oncogenic mutations, especially within the juxtamembrane domain of KIT, are the most responsive to imatinib treatment.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mol CD, Dougan DR, Schneider TR, et al.: Structural basis for the autoinhibition and STI-571 inhibition of c-Kit tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 31655–31663. This study was the first to report the crystal structure of native KIT kinase in its autoinhibited conformation. Structure changes between wild-type and mutant KIT were analyzed using protein structure determination.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lasota J, Wozniak A, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al.: Mutations in exons 9 and 13 of KIT gene are rare events in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. A study of 200 cases. Am J Pathol 2000, 157: 1091–1095.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Subramanian S, West RB, Corless CL, et al.: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with KIT and PDGFRA mutations have distinct gene expression profiles. Oncogene 2004, 23: 7780–7790. This study demonstrated that mutations in KIT and PDGFRα affect expression of distinct sets of genes. Therefore, such gene products could serve as selective therapeutic targets in GIST containing KIT or PDGFR_ mutations.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heinrich MC, Corless CL: Gastric GI stromal tumors (GISTs):the role of surgery in the era of targeted therapy. J Surg Oncol 2005, 90: 195–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Antonescu CR, Besmer P, Guo T, et al.: Acquired resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor occurs through secondary gene mutation. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11: 4182–4190. This is a comprehensive study that examined the acquired resistance of imatinib therapy caused by a somatic secondary mutation in KIT kinase domain.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nishida T, Hirota S, Taniguchi M, et al.: Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumours with germline mutation of the KIT gene. Nat Genet 1998, 19: 323–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robson ME, Glogowski E, Sommer G, et al.: Pleomorphic characteristics of a germ-line KIT mutation in a large kindred with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, hyperpigmentation, and dysphagia. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10: 1250–1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maeyama H, Hidaka E, Ota H, et al.: Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor with hyperpigmentation:association with a germline mutation of the c-kit gene. Gastroenterology 2001, 120: 210–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Isozaki K, Terris B, Belghiti J, et al.: Germline-activating mutation in the kinase domain of KIT gene in familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Pathol 2000, 157: 1581–1585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kabarowski JH, Allen PB, Wiedemann LM: A temperature sensitive p210 BCR-ABL mutant defines the primary consequences of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase expression in growth factor dependent cells. EMBO J 1994, 13: 5887–5895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lopez-Ilasaca M, Li W, Uren A, et al.: Requirement of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase for activation of JNK/ SAPKs by PDGF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997, 232: 273–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shen Y, Devgan G, Darnell JE Jr, et al.: Constitutively activated Stat3 protects fibroblasts from serum withdrawal and UV-induced apoptosis and antagonizes the proapoptotic effects of activated Stat1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98: 1543–1548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Atfi A, Prunier C, Mazars A, et al.: The oncogenic TEL/ PDGFR beta fusion protein induces cell death through JNK/SAPK pathway. Oncogene 1999, 18: 3878–3885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Duensing A, Medeiros F, McConarty B, et al.: Mechanisms of oncogenic KIT signal transduction in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Oncogene 2004, 23: 3999–4006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Giannini C, Sarkaria JN, Saito A, et al.: Patient tumor EGFR and PDGFRA gene amplifications retained in an invasive intracranial xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro-oncol 2005, 7: 164–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilczynski SP, Chen YY, Chen W, et al.: Expression and mutational analysis of tyrosine kinase receptors c-kit, PDGFRalpha, and PDGFRbeta in ovarian cancers. Hum Pathol 2005, 36: 242–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lev DC, Kim SJ, Onn A, et al.: Inhibition of plateletderived growth factor receptor signaling restricts the growth of human breast cancer in the bone of nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11: 306–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Corless CL, Schroeder A, Griffith D, et al.: PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors:frequency, spectrum and in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. J Clin Oncol 2005, In press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bachman KE, Argani P, Samuels Y, et al.: The PIK3CA gene is mutated with high frequency in human breast cancers. Cancer Biol Ther 2004, 3: 772–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dematteo RP, Heinrich MC, El-Rifai WM, et al.: Clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors:before and after STI-571. Hum Pathol 2002, 33: 466–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, et al.: Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med 1996, 2: 561–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, et al.: Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med 2001, 344: 1038–1042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Buchdunger E, Cioffi CL, Law N, et al.: Abl protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 inhibits in vitro signal transduction mediated by c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000, 295: 139–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, et al.: Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med 2002, 347: 472–480. This multicenter clinical trial was the first to demonstrate efficacy of imatinib in patients with an advanced unresectable or metastatic GIST.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Eisenberg BL: Imatinib mesylate:a molecularly targeted therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncology (Williston Park) 2003, 17: 1615–1620.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    von Mehren M: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors:a paradigm for molecularly targeted therapy. Cancer Invest 2003, 21: 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, et al.: Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21: 4342–4349. Patients with GISTs with exon 11 mutations were found to have a longer event-free and overall survival than were patients whose tumors expressed other types of mutations or had no detectable KIT mutation.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kim TW, Lee H, Kang YK, et al.: Prognostic significance of c-kit mutation in localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10: 3076–3081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Debiec-Rychter M, Dumez H, Judson I, et al.: Use of c-KIT/PDGFRA mutational analysis to predict the clinical response to imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours entered in phase I and II studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 2004, 40: 689–695. KIT and PDGFR_ mutational analysis were used to predict the clinical responses to imatinib therapy in patients with GISTs. GISTs with exon 11 mutations were found to be more likely to achieve a partial response on imatinib therapy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sawaki A, Yamao K: Imatinib mesylate acts in metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor by targeting KIT receptors--a review. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2004, 54(Suppl 1): S44-S49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chen LL, Trent JC, Wu EF, et al.: A missense mutation in KIT kinase domain 1 correlates with imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res 2004, 64: 5913–5919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Debiec-Rychter M, Cools J, Dumez H, et al.: Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and activity of the PKC412 inhibitor against imatinib-resistant mutants. Gastroenterology 2005, 128: 270–279. This paper demonstrated that imatinib-resistant GISTs with acquired secondary mutation in KIT and in PDGFRα were sensitive to PKC412, a new kinase inhibitor that is now undergoing clinical trials as alternative GIST therapy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tamborini E, Gabanti E, Lagonigro MS, et al.: KIT/Val654 Ala receptor detected in one imatinib-resistant GIST patient. Cancer Res 2005, 65: 1115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wardelmann E, Thomas N, Merkelbach-Bruse S, et al.: Acquired resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumours caused by multiple KIT mutations. Lancet Oncol 2005, 6: 249–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fletcher JA, Corless C, Dimitrijevic S: Mechanism of resistance to imatinib mesylate (IM) in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) [abstract 3275]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003, 22: 815.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Plaat BE, Hollema H, Molenaar WM, et al.: Soft tissue leiomyosarcomas and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors:differences in clinical outcome and expression of multidrug resistance proteins. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18: 3211–3220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X, et al.: In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors:determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res 2003, 9: 327–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Osusky KL, Hallahan DE, Fu A, et al.: The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11248 impedes endothelial cell migration, tubule formation, and blood vessel formation in vivo, but has little effect on existing tumor vessels. Angiogenesis 2004, 7: 225–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Reichardt P, Pink D, Lindner T,et al.: A phase I/II trial of the oral PKC-inhibitor PKC412 (PKC) in combination with imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor refractory to IM [abstract 3016]. Paper presented at the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL, May 13–17, 2005.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Frolov A, Chahwan S, Ochs M, et al.: Response markers and the molecular mechanisms of action of Gleevec in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2003, 2: 699–709. This was the first report that examined the gene expression profiles in response to imatinib therapy in patients with GISTs. GIST specimens taken from patients before and after intramuscular administration demonstrated that expression of two genes, sprouty 4 (SPRY4A) and muscle atrophy Fbx (MAFbx), correlated well with clinical response.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    West RB, Corless CL, Chen X, et al.: The novel marker, DOG1, is expressed ubiquitously in gastrointestinal stromal tumors irrespective of KIT or PDGFRA mutation status. Am J Pathol 2004, 165: 107–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Koon N, Schneider-Stock R, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al.: Molecular targets for tumour progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Gut 2004, 53: 235–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Prakash S, Sarran L, Socci N, et al.: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in children and young adults:a clinicopathologic, molecular, and genomic study of 15 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2005, 27: 179–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Li FP, Fletcher JA, Heinrich MC, et al.: Familial gastro-intestinal stromal tumor syndrome:phenotypic and molecular features in a kindred. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23: 2735–2743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Lasota J, et al.: High prognostic value of p16INK4 alterations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21: 1688–1697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Lasota J, et al.: Loss of p16 protein defines high-risk patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors:a tissue microarray study. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11: 638–645. Loss of p16 INK4 was found to be associated with worse prognosis in patients with GISTs. p16INK4 loss is a common molecular abnormality in GIST and might be used to identify patients with high-risk tumors.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sharpless NE:INK4a/ARF: a multifunctional tumor suppressor locus. Mutat Res 2005, In press.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Takahashi E, Hori T, O’Connell P, et al.: Mapping of the MYC gene to band 8q24.12----q24.13 by R-banding and distal to fra(8)(q24.11), FRA8E, by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1991, 57: 109–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Leach FS, Tokino T, Meltzer P, et al.: p53 mutation and MDM2 amplification in human soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Res 1993, 53: 2231–2234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tornillo L, Duchini G, Carafa V, et al.: Patterns of gene amplification in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Lab Invest 2005, 85: 921–931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sakurai S, Fukayama M, Kaizaki Y, et al.: Telomerase activity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer 1998, 83: 2060–2066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gunawan B, Bergmann F, Hoer J, et al.: Biological and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in low-risk and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Hum Pathol 2002, 33: 316–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    House MG, Guo M, Efron DT, et al.: Tumor suppressor gene hypermethylation as a predictor of gastric stromal tumor behavior. J Gastrointest Surg 2003, 7: 1004–1014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hirota S, Ohashi A, Nishida T, et al.: Gain-of-function mutations of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastroenterology 2003, 125: 660–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chi Tarn
  • Andrew K. Godwin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical OncologyFox Chase Cancer CenterPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations