Low-numerate adults, motivational factors in learning, and their employment, education and training status in Germany, the US, and South Korea
Drawing on the PIAAC data, in this paper I examine how motivational factors such as motivation to learn and grit are related to low-numerate adults’ employment status and their actual participation in lifelong learning in Germany, the United States and South Korea. In particular, the study uses PIAAC self-reported data on the degree to which the respondent “likes learning new things”, and “likes to get to the bottom of difficult things” as proxies of motivational factors in adult learning. Findings show that across three countries both motivation to learn and grit have independent relationships with adults’ employment status and actual participation in adult learning. Considering that low-skilled adults are the ones who need further learning the most, yet are repeatedly reported to have the lowest rate of participation in further learning, these findings highlight the motivational factors in adult learning. They also suggest that motivation to learn and grit may mitigate the disadvantages that ‘vulnerable’ adults experience due to low numeracy skills. Implications for mathematics educators and adult education research are discussed.
KeywordsLow numeracy skills Motivational factors Adult education and learning PIAAC
- Attanasio, O. P., Blundell, R. W., Conti, G., & Mason, G. (2018). Inequality in socioemotional skills: A cross-cohort comparison (No. W18/22). IFS Working Papers.Google Scholar
- Avvisati, F., & Keslair, F. (2014). REPEST: Stata module to run estimations with weighted replicate samples and plausible values. Statistical Software Components S457918, Boston College Department of Economics.Google Scholar
- BMBF. (2018). Weiterbildungsverhalten in Deutschland 2018. Ergebnisse des Adult Education Survey (AES). Bonn. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/upload_filestore/pub/Weiterbildungsverhalten_in_Deutschland_2018.pdf.
- Bynner, J., & Parsons, S. (2006). New light on literacy and numeracy. London: National Research and Development centre for adult literacy and numeracy.Google Scholar
- Coben, D. (2000). Numeracy, mathematics, and adult learning. In I. Gal (Ed.), Adult numeracy development: Theory, research, practice (pp. 33–50). Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
- Coben, D. (2002). Mathematics or common sense? Researching ‘invisible’ mathematics through adults’ mathematics life histories. In D. Coben, J. O’Donoghue, & G. E. FitzSimons (Eds.), Perspectives on adults learning mathematics: Research and practice (pp. 53–65). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Condelli, L., Safford-Ramus, K., Sherman, R., Coben, D., Gal, I., & Hector-Mason, A. (2006). A review of the literature in adult numeracy: research and conceptual issues. (Prepared by American Institutes for Research for the Adult Numeracy Initiative of the US. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495456.pdf.
- Crittenden, A. H. (2000). A case study of the perception of the development and transfer of work related mathematical concepts to personal finance management for women in a remedial mathematics class. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61 (09), 3437A. (UMI No. 9986406).Google Scholar
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). (2012). 2011 Skills for Life survey: A survey of literacy, numeracy and ICT levels in England. London (BIS Research Paper, 81). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/36000/12-p168-2011-skills-for-life-survey.pdf.
- Desjardins, R. (2013). The economics of adult education: A critical assessment of the state of investment in adult education. Adult learning in a precarious age. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Espinoza, R., Sarzosa, M., Urzúa, S., & Miyamoto, K. (2014). The causal effect of skills: An international study (pp. 1–53). Maryland: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
- FitzSimons, G. E., & Coben, D. (2009). Adult numeracy for work and life: Curriculum and teaching implications of recent research. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning: 1–6 (pp. 2731–2745). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gal, I., Alatorre, S., Close, S., Evans, J., Johansen, L., Maguire, T. et al. (2009). PIAAC Numeracy. A conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Paper No. 35. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and ‘vulnerable’ learners: A critical review of a neglected field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(2).Google Scholar
- Gal, I., van Groenestijn, M., Manly, M., Schmitt, M. J., & Tout, D. (2005). Adult numeracy and its assessment in the ALL survey: A conceptual framework and pilot results. In T. S. Murray, Y. Clermont, & M. Binkley (Eds.), Measuring adult literacy and life skills: New frameworks for assessment (pp. 137–191). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
- Grotlüschen, A., & Bonna F. (2008). German-language literature review. In Teaching, learning and assessment for adults: Improving foundation skills. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/172255303131.
- Grotlüschen, A., Buddeberg, K., Dutz, G., Heilmann, L., Stammer, C. (2019a). LEO 2018—Living with low literacy. Press brochure, Hamburg. http://blogs.epb.uni-hamburg.de/leo.
- Grotlüschen, A., Mallows, D., Reder, S., & Sabatini, J. (2016). Adults with low proficiency in literacy or numeracy. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 131, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm0v44bnmnx-en.
- Guerra, N., Modecki, K., & Cunningham, W. (2014). Developing social-emotional skills for the labor market: The PRACTICE model. The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Guglielmino, P. J., & Guglielmino, L. M. (2011). An exploration of cultural dimensions and economic indicators as predictors of self-directed learning readiness. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning,8(1), 29–45.Google Scholar
- Hodgen, J., Coben, D., & Rhodes, V. (2010). Feedback, talk and engaging with learners: Formative assessment in adult numeracy. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jonas, N. (2012). In the most recent birth cohorts, adults have fewer difficulties in writing, but greater ones in arithmetic. INSEE PREMIERE, No 1426. Paris. Retrieved from https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/1281411.
- Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner (8th ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Maguire, T., & O’Donoghue, J. (2002). A grounded approach to practitioner training in Ireland: Some findings from a national survey of practitioners in Adult Basic Education. In: L. Ø.Johansen & T. Wedege (Eds.), Numeracy for empowerment and democracy? Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Adult Learning Mathematics—A Research Forum (ALM8) (pp. 120–132). Roskilde, Denmark, Roskilde University, Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics. Hent, UK: Avanti Books.Google Scholar
- Marcou, A., & Lerman, S. (2007). Changes in students’ motivational beliefs and performance in a self-regulated mathematical problem-solving environment (pp. 288–297). Cyprus: CERME 5.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016b). Technical report of the survey of adult skills (PIAAC) (2nd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019b). The use of test scores in secondary analysis A dialogue between data users and data producers. OECD PIAAC Methodological Seminar, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/The_use_of_test_scores_in_secondary_analysis_14_June_2019_Concept_Note.pdf.
- Paccagnella, M. (2016). Literacy and numeracy proficiency in IALS, ALL and PIAAC, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 142, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpq7qglx5g-en.
- Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2012). Effects of treating multiple solutions on students’ self-regulation, self-efficacy and value. In: T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Taipei: PME, pp.59–66.Google Scholar
- Swain, J., Baker, E., Holder, D., Newmarch, B., & Coben, D. (2005). ‘Beyond the daily application’: Making numeracy teaching meaningful to adult learners. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.Google Scholar
- von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. (2009). What are plausible values and why are they useful. IERI Monograph Series,2(1), 9–36.Google Scholar
- Whitten, D. R. (2018). Understanding the beliefs and behaviours of low-skilled adults as they re-engage with mathematics. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato.Google Scholar
- Yamamoto, K., Khorramdel, L., Davier, M. (2013). Scaling PIAAC cognitive data. In: OECD (Ed.), Technical report of the survey of adult skills PIAAC. OECD, Paris, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar