Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 51, Issue 7, pp 1183–1197 | Cite as

Symbolizing while solving linear systems

  • Michelle ZandiehEmail author
  • Christine Andrews-Larson
Original Article

Abstract

Solving systems of linear equations is of central importance in linear algebra and many related applications, yet there is limited literature examining the symbolizing processes students use as they work to solve systems of linear equations. In this paper, we examine this issue by analyzing final exam data from 68 students in an introductory undergraduate linear algebra course at a large public research university in the United States. Based on our analysis, we expanded our framework (Larson & Zandieh, 2013) for interpretations of matrix equations to include augmented matrices and symbolic forms commonly used in solving linear systems. We document considerable variation in students’ symbolization processes, which broadly occurred along two primary trajectories: systems trajectories and row reduction trajectories. Row reduction trajectories included at least five symbolic shifts, two of which students executed with a great deal of success and uniformity. Students’ symbolizing processes varied more in relation to the other three shifts, and these variations were often linked to trends of variable renaming, variable creation, or imagined parameter reasoning. Students were more flexible in their solution strategies when solving systems involving lines than for systems involving planes.

Keywords

Linear algebra Systems of equations Augmented matrices Student reasoning 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by National Science Foundation (Grant no. DUE 1712524).

References

  1. Dorier, J. L., Robert, A., Robinet, J., & Rogalski, M. (2000). The obstacles of formalism in linear algebra. In J. L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 85–124). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Dorier, J.-L., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 255–273). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Harel, G. (2017). The learning and teaching of linear algebra: Observations and generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,46, 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hillel, J. (2000). Modes of description and the problem of representation in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 191–207). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2013). Three interpretations of the matrix equation Ax = b. For the Learning of Mathematics,33(2), 11–17.Google Scholar
  7. Lay, D. (2012). Linear algebra and its applications (4th ed.). Hoboken: Pearson.Google Scholar
  8. Oktaç, A. (2018). Conceptions about system of linear equations and solution. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra (pp. 71–101). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Possani, E., Trigueros, M., Preciado, J. G., & Lozano, M. D. (2010). Use of models in the teaching of linear algebra. Linear Algebra and its Applications,432(8), 2125–2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2015). Examining individual and collective level mathematical progress. Educational Studies in Mathematics,88(2), 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., King, K., & Teppo, A. (2005). Advancing mathematical activity: A view of advanced mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning,7, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sandoval, I., & Possani, E. (2016). An analysis of different representations for vectors and planes in ℝ3. Educational Studies in Mathematics,92(1), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Steinberg, R. M., Sleeman, D. H., & Ktorza, D. (1991). Algebra students’ knowledge of equivalence of equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,22(2), 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2009). A framework for mathematical thinking: The case of linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,40(7), 951–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Trigueros, M. (2018). Learning linear algebra using models and conceptual activities. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra (pp. 29–50). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trigueros, M., & Possani, E. (2013). Using an economics model for teaching linear algebra. Linear Algebra and its Applications,438(4), 1779–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zandieh, M. (2000). A theoretical framework for analyzing student understanding of the concept of derivative. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education,8, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zandieh, M. J., & Knapp, J. (2006). Exploring the role of metonymy in mathematical understanding and reasoning: The concept of derivative as an example. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,25(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zandieh, M., & Knapp, J. (2018). Metonymy and metaphor: How language can impact understanding of mathematical concepts (Part I). MathAMATYC Educator,9(2), 23–27.Google Scholar
  21. Zandieh, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2010). Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,29(2), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zandieh, M., Wawro, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2017). An example of inquiry in linear algebra: The roles of symbolizing and brokering. PRIMUS,27(1), 96–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, College of Integrative Sciences and ArtsArizona State University, Polytechnic CampusMesaUSA
  2. 2.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations