Solving systems of linear equations is of central importance in linear algebra and many related applications, yet there is limited literature examining the symbolizing processes students use as they work to solve systems of linear equations. In this paper, we examine this issue by analyzing final exam data from 68 students in an introductory undergraduate linear algebra course at a large public research university in the United States. Based on our analysis, we expanded our framework (Larson & Zandieh, 2013) for interpretations of matrix equations to include augmented matrices and symbolic forms commonly used in solving linear systems. We document considerable variation in students’ symbolization processes, which broadly occurred along two primary trajectories: systems trajectories and row reduction trajectories. Row reduction trajectories included at least five symbolic shifts, two of which students executed with a great deal of success and uniformity. Students’ symbolizing processes varied more in relation to the other three shifts, and these variations were often linked to trends of variable renaming, variable creation, or imagined parameter reasoning. Students were more flexible in their solution strategies when solving systems involving lines than for systems involving planes.
KeywordsLinear algebra Systems of equations Augmented matrices Student reasoning
Funding was provided by National Science Foundation (Grant no. DUE 1712524).
- Dorier, J. L., Robert, A., Robinet, J., & Rogalski, M. (2000). The obstacles of formalism in linear algebra. In J. L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 85–124). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Dorier, J.-L., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 255–273). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- Hillel, J. (2000). Modes of description and the problem of representation in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 191–207). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2013). Three interpretations of the matrix equation Ax = b. For the Learning of Mathematics,33(2), 11–17.Google Scholar
- Lay, D. (2012). Linear algebra and its applications (4th ed.). Hoboken: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Zandieh, M., & Knapp, J. (2018). Metonymy and metaphor: How language can impact understanding of mathematical concepts (Part I). MathAMATYC Educator,9(2), 23–27.Google Scholar