Advertisement

ZDM

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Learning with and from immigrant mothers: implications for adult numeracy

  • Marta CivilEmail author
  • Kathleen Jablon Stoehr
  • Fany Salazar
Original Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on a group of mothers of immigrant origin as they engage in explorations and conversations about mathematics. We examine how bringing in tasks that draw on their children’s school mathematics, and on the participants’ knowledge and experiences, can inform us about their understanding of mathematics and provide opportunities to further enhance this understanding. Our analysis centers on two different types of mathematical tasks, both with rich potential for adult numeracy education. The first type of task engages the mothers in school mathematics through an exploration of addition and subtraction. In the second type of task, we look at mothers as adult learners working on two mathematical problem solving tasks, with different levels of connections to their everyday experiences. The findings point to a relationship between the type of context (everyday based versus school based) and the nature of the adult learners’ mathematical sense making and engagement with the tasks. While there was some initial apprehension towards the school based tasks, the direct connection to what their children are learning was a strong motivator. The everyday based tasks bring up the potential tension between everyday mathematics and academic mathematics. The more the task connected to their everyday knowledge, the more the mothers drew on their experience to offer approaches that made sense from a practical point of view. We argue that these different types of tasks can complement each other in working with adult learners to enhance their numeracy skills.

Keywords

Parents Immigrants Numeracy Funds of knowledge Problem-solving Sense-making 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Heising-Simons Foundation, Grant #2016-065. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency.

References

  1. Abreu, G., & Cline, T. (2007). Social valorization of mathematical practices: The implications for learners in multicultural schools. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 118–131). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benn, R. (1997). Adults count too: Mathematics for empowerment. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  3. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, M. E., & Moschkovich, J. N. (Eds.). (2002). Everyday and academic mathematics in the classroom. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Civil, M. (2001). Parents as learners and teachers of mathematics: Towards a two-way dialogue. In M. J. Schmitt & K. Safford-Ramus (Eds.), Adults learning mathematics—7: A conversation between researchers and practitioners (pp. 173–177). Cambridge: ALM & NCSALL.Google Scholar
  7. Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Civil, M., & Hunter, R. (2015). Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom. Intercultural Education, 26(4), 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.Google Scholar
  10. Díez-Palomar, J., Menéndez, J., & Civil, M. (2011). Learning mathematics with adult learners: Drawing from parents’ perspective. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 14(1), 71–94.Google Scholar
  11. English, L. (2006). Mathematical modeling in the primary school: Children’s construction of a consumer guide. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 303–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9013-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, J. (2000). Adults mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practices. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  13. González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Introduction: Theorizing practices. In N. González, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 1–24). Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Pozzi, S. (2001). Proportional reasoning in nursing practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson, K., Rogers, A., & Yasukawa, K. (2018). Expanding and deepening the terrain: Numeracy as social practice. In K. Yasukawa, A. Rogers, K. Jackson, & B. Street (Eds.), Numeracy as social practice: global and local perspectives (pp. 243–254). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Jonas, N. (2018). Numeracy practices and numeracy skills among adults. (OECD Education Working Papers No. 177).  https://doi.org/10.1787/8f19fc9f-en.
  17. Knijnik, G. (1993). An ethnomathematical approach in mathematical education: A matter of political power. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 23–25.Google Scholar
  18. Knijnik, G. (2002). Ethnomathematics: Culture and politics of knowledge in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(1), 11–14.Google Scholar
  19. Knijnik, G., & Wanderer, F. (2018). Broadening school mathematics curriculum: The complexity of teaching mathematical language games of different forms of life. In K. Yasukawa, A. Rogers, K. Jackson, & B. Street (Eds.), Numeracy as social practice: global and local perspectives (pp. 121–132). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lave, J. (1992). Word problems: A microcosm of theories of learning. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 74–92). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  22. Masingila, J. (1994). Mathematics practice in carpet laying. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 25, 430–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menéndez, J. M., & Civil, M. (2009). The role of cognition and affect on adults participation in a nonformal setting for learning mathematics. In K. Safford-Ramus (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Adults Learning Mathematics—A research forum (pp. 147–164). Philadelphia: Chestnut Hill College.Google Scholar
  24. Moll, L. C. (2005). Reflections and possibilities. In N. González, L. C. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 275–287). Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (2005). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In N. González, L. C. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 71–87). Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015). A trivium curriculum for mathematics based on literacy, matheracy, and technoracy: An ethnomathematics perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 587–598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0688-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saxe, G. B. (1988). Candy selling and math learning. Educational Researcher, 17(6), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Suh, J. M., Matson, K., & Seshaiyer, P. (2017). Engaging elementary students in the creative process of mathematizing their world through mathematical modeling. Education Sciences, 7(62), 1–21.Google Scholar
  30. Yasukawa, K., Jackson, K., Kane, P., & Coben, D. (2018). Mapping the terrain of social practice perspectives of numeracy. In K. Yasukawa, A. Rogers, K. Jackson, & B. Street (Eds.), Numeracy as social practice: Global and local perspectives (pp. 3–17). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EducationSanta Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA

Personalised recommendations