Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 213–226 | Cite as

Mediating primary mathematics: measuring the extent of teaching for connections and generality in the context of whole number arithmetic

  • Mike AskewEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This paper is centred around a framework for studying teaching—Mediating Primary Mathematics (MPM)—developed in the context of the teaching of Whole Number Arithmetic (WNA) in South Africa. Findings from the analysis of four WNA lessons are used to illustrate how the application of the MPM framework can measure nuanced differences in the meditational means—both artefact- and human-based—employed by teachers. Detailed analysis of differences observed across these lessons shows that the mathematics taught can go beyond localized procedures and counting-based methods, and engage learners in mathematical activity that involves affordances for making connection and generalizing, particularly with respect to counting with composite units, a key developmental stage in WNA.

Keywords

Artefact and human mediation Primary Whole number arithmetic Composite counting 

References

  1. Askew, M. (2015). Seeing through place value: An example of connectionist teaching. In: X. Sun, B. Kaur & J. Novotná (Eds) ICMI study 23 conference proceedings: Primary mathematics study on whole numbers. Macao, China, University of Macau (pp. 399–407).Google Scholar
  2. Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & William, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. London: King’s College/Teacher Training Agency.Google Scholar
  3. Askew, M., Venkat, H., & Mathews, C. (2012). Coherence and consistency in South African primary mathematics lessons. In: Tso, T. Y. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 2, 27–34), Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  4. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  5. Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H.-W., & Niss, M. (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 243–307). The Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar
  7. Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for a mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 375–402.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Basic Education. (2014). The annual national assessment of 2014: diagnostic report intermediate and senior phases mathematics. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.Google Scholar
  9. Fleisch, B., Schoer, V., Roberts, G., & Thornton, A. (2016). System-wide improvement of early-grade mathematics: New evidence from the Gauteng Primary Language and Mathematics Strategy. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 157–174.Google Scholar
  10. Fuson, K. C., & Briars, D. J. (1990). Using a base-ten blocks learning/teaching approach for first- and second-grade place-value and multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 180–206.Google Scholar
  11. Gray, E., Pitta, D., & Tall, D. (1999). Objects, actions, and images: A perspective on early number development. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 18, 401–413.Google Scholar
  12. Gray, E. M. (1991). An analysis of diverging approaches to simple arithmetic: preference and its consequences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 551–574.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.Google Scholar
  14. Hoadley, U. (2012). What do we know about teaching and learning in South African primary schools? Education as Change, 16(2), 187–202.Google Scholar
  15. Huang, R., & Li, Y. (Eds.). (2017). Teaching and learning mathematics through variation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev & S. S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 15–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  19. Rowland, T., Turner, F., Thwaites, A., & Huckstep, P. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching: Reflecting on practice with the knowledge quartet. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Russell, S. J. (2008). Computational fluency: Working with a struggling student. Connect, 22(1), 8–12.Google Scholar
  21. Schifter, D. (2011). Examining the behavior of operations: Noticing early algebraic ideas. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing. Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 205–220). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Schifter, D., Russell, S. J., & Bastable, V. (2009). Early algebra to reach the range of learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(4), 230–237.Google Scholar
  23. Steffe, L. P. (1992). Schemes of action and operation involving composite units. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(3), 259–309.Google Scholar
  24. Venkat, H., & Askew, M. (2012). Mediating early number learning: Specialising across teacher talk and tools. Journal of Education, 56, 67–90.Google Scholar
  25. Venkat, H., & Askew, M. (2018). Mediating primary mathematics: theory, concepts, and a framework for studying practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97, 71–92.Google Scholar
  26. Venkat, H., & Naidoo, D. (2012). Analyzing coherence for conceptual learning in a Grade 2 numeracy lesson. Education as Change, 16(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
  27. Vygotsky, L. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum. (Trans. N. Minick).Google Scholar
  28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). Creating productive learning communities in the mathematics classroom: An international literature review. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(3), 133–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800802026595.Google Scholar
  30. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.Google Scholar
  31. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wertsch, J. V. (1999). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations