Sixth grade students’ emerging practices of data modelling
We explore 11–12-year-old students’ emerging ideas of models and modelling as they engage in a data-modelling task involving inquiry based on data obtained from an experiment. We report on a design-based study in which students identified what and how to measure, decided how to structure and represent data, and made inferences and predictions based on data. Our focus was on the following: (1) the nature of the student-generated models and (2) how students evaluated the models. Data from written work generated by groups and transcripts of interviews were analysed using progressive focussing. The results showed that groups constructed models of actual data by paying attention to various aspects of distributions. We found a tendency to use differing criteria for evaluating the success of models. This data modelling process also fostered students’ making sense of key ideas, tools and procedures in statistics that are usually treated in isolation and without context in school mathematics. In particular, we identified how some students appeared to gain insights into how a ‘good’ statistical model might incorporate some properties that are invariant when the simulation is repeated for small and large sample sizes (signal) and other properties that are not sustained in the same way (noise).
KeywordsData modelling Distribution Informal statistical inference Middle school students
This work was supported by PAU-ADEP 2017KRM002-159. We would also like to acknowledge insightful and constructive feedback from all reviewers and editor of this manuscript, and the generous work of the students who participated in this study.
- Ainley, J., & Pratt, D. (2017). Computational modeling and children’s expressions of signal and noise. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 15–37.Google Scholar
- Common Core Standards Writing Team. (2013). Progressions for the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (draft, July 4). High School, Modeling. Tucson: Institute for Mathematics and Education, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
- Fielding-Wells, F., & Makar, K. (2015). Inferring to a model: Using inquiry-based argumentation to challenge young children’s expectations of equally likely outcomes. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning (pp. 1–28). Minneapolis: Catalyst Press.Google Scholar
- Gravemeijer, K. (2002). Emergent modeling as the basis for an instructional sequence on data analysis. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on the teaching of statistics (ICOTS-6), Cape Town, South Africa, [CD-ROM]. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
- Konold, C., & Kazak, S. (2008). Reconnecting data and chance. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 2. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/cts/tise/vol2/iss1/art1. Accessed 21 Apr 2017.
- Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2011). TinkerPlots 2.0: Dynamic data exploration. Emeryville: Key Curriculum.Google Scholar
- Konold, C., Robinson, A., Khalil, K., Pollatsek, A., Well, A. D., Wing, R., & Mayr, S. (2002). Students’ use of modal clumps to summarize data. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on the teaching of statistics (ICOTS-6), Cape Town, South Africa, [CD-ROM]. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2002). Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children’s understanding of math and science. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 82–105.Google Scholar
- MEB (2018a). Matematik Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara: TTKB.Google Scholar
- MEB. (2018b). Matematik Öğretim Programı (9, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) (p. 10). Ankara: TTKB.Google Scholar
- Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Noll, J., & Kirin, D. (2017). TinkerPlots model construction approaches for comparing two groups: Student perspectives. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 213–243.Google Scholar
- Parlett, M., & Hamilton, D. (1972). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programs, Occasional Paper no 9. University of Edinburgh, Centre for Research in the Educational Sciences, Edinburgh. (Retrieved from ERIC database (ED167634).Google Scholar
- Tall, D., & Gray, E. (1991). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. The Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 115–141.Google Scholar