Advertisement

ZDM

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Developing students’ ability to solve word problems through learning trajectory-based and variation task-informed instruction

  • Rongjin Huang
  • Qinqiong Zhang
  • Yu-ping Chang
  • Dovie Kimmins
Original Article

Abstract

Solving word problems is challenging in elementary schools, both for the teacher in teaching students to solve word problems and for the student in learning to solve them. This paper examines how the ideas of learning trajectory and variation pedagogy could be integrated as an instructional principle for teaching this content in the context of solving additive comparison problems. Based on research literature, a learning trajectory for solving additive comparison problems was identified. Informed by variation pedagogy and using a lesson study approach, a research team explored how to teach solving comparison word problems based on this learning trajectory. Data included lesson plans, videotaped research lessons, students’ pre- and post-tests, and students’ interviews. A fine-grained analysis of the data demonstrated that the lessons unfolded through exploration of a series of deliberate tasks along the learning trajectory, focusing on the structure of comparison problems and targeted at objects of learning. Purposefully constructed patterns of variation and invariance provided students with necessary conditions to discern and experience the objects of learning. Students were actively engaged in making sense of comparison problems and articulating their thinking using multiple representations. While the post-test and interview data show students’ understanding of key aspects of solving additive comparison problems to be at various levels, students’ gains in overall performance from pre- to post-test were statistically significant. Implications for teaching comparison word problems are discussed.

Keywords

Additive comparison word problems Lesson study Variation theory Learning trajectory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We extend our thanks for the strong support from the participating school, Qiaotou no. 2 Elementary School of Yongjia County, City of Wenzhou, and especially to teaching research specialist Ms. Yuxiao Nan and mathematics teacher Jing Huang for their intellectual contribution to improving the design and teaching of the comparison word problem lessons.

References

  1. Baroody, A. J., & Purpura, D. J. (2017). Early number and operations: Whole numbers. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 308–354). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  2. Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H. (1984). An integrated model of skills in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 245–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai, J., & Lester, F. A. (2005). Solution and pedagogical representations in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics, National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC. Retrieved at: http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice. Accessed 9 Aug 2018.
  7. Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 243–275). New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Fuson, K. C., Carroll, W. M., & Landis, J. (1996). Levels in conceptualization and solving addition and subtraction compare word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14(3), 345–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuson, K. C., & Murata, A. (2007). Integrating NRC principles and the NCTM process standards to form a class learning path model that individualizes within whole-class activities. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 10(1), 72–91.Google Scholar
  10. Fuson, K. C., Murata, A., & Abrahamson, D. (2014). Using learning path research to balance mathematics education: Teaching/learning for understanding and fluency. In R. Cohen, Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1036–1054). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gu, F., Huang, R., & Gu, L. (2017). Practice and development of teaching through variation in China. In R. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and learning through variations (pp. 13–42). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gu, L., Huang, R., & Marton, F. (2004). Teaching with variation: An effective way of mathematics teaching in China. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 309–348). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem-solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, R., Gong, Z., & Han, X. (2016). Implementing mathematics teaching that promotes students’ understanding through theory-driven lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang, R., & Han, X. (2015). Developing mathematics teachers’ competence through parallel lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang, R., Kimmins, D., Winters, J., Douglas, D., & Tessema, A. (2017). Teacher learning through perfecting a lesson through Chinese lesson study. Paper presented at PME-NA 39 in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translation among representations in mathematical learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problem of representation in teaching and learning of mathematics learning (pp. 3–40). Hilldale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, A. B. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students’ miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, C. (2016). How does lesson study improve mathematics instruction? ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, X. (1992). On integrity and development of children’s addition and subtraction cognitive structure (in Chinese). Psychological Development and Education, 8(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
  22. Lo, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012). Toward a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 7–22.Google Scholar
  23. Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ministry of Education, P. R. China (MoE). (2011). Mathematics curriculum standards for compulsory education (grades 1–9) (in Chinese). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Múñez, D., Qrrantia, J., & Rosales, J. (2013). The effect of external representations on compare word problems: Supporting mental model construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mwangi, W., & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).Google Scholar
  29. Nunes, T., Dorneles, B. V., Lin, P. J., & Rathgeb-Schnierer, E. (2016). Teaching and learning about whole numbers in primary school. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pang, M. F., Bao, J. S., & Ki, W. W. (2017). “Bianshi” and the variation theory of learning: Illustrating two frameworks of variation and invariance in the teaching of mathematics. In R. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and learning through variations (pp. 43–68). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pape, S. J. (2003). Compare word problems: Consistency hypothesis revisited. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 396–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon, M. A. (1995). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stern, E. (1993). What makes certain arithmetic word problems involving the comparison of sets so difficult for children? Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun, X. (2011). “Variation problems” and their roles in the topic of fraction division in Chinese mathematics textbook examples. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston: Person Education Inc. (9 edition).Google Scholar
  38. Verschaffel, L. (1994). Using retelling data to study elementary school children’s representations and solutions of compare problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Pauwels, A. (1992). Solving compare problems: An eye-movement test of Lewis and Mayer’s consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557–628). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, J. (2013). Mathematics education in China: Tradition and reality. Singapore: Galeasia Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, P. H., Mojica, G. F., & Confrey, J. (2013). Learning trajectories in teacher education: Supporting teachers’ understandings of students’ mathematical thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., Edgington, C., & Myers, M. (2015). Teachers’ uses of a learning trajectory in student-centered instructional practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang, Y., & Ricks, T. E. (2013). How crucial incidents analysis support Chinese lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou, Z., & Peverly, S. T. (2005). Teaching addition and subtraction to first graders: A Chinese perspective. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rongjin Huang
    • 1
  • Qinqiong Zhang
    • 2
  • Yu-ping Chang
    • 2
  • Dovie Kimmins
    • 1
  1. 1.Middle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA
  2. 2.Wenzhou UniversityZhejiangChina

Personalised recommendations