Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 7, pp 1267–1280 | Cite as

Students’ use of narrative when constructing statistical models in TinkerPlots

  • Jennifer Noll
  • Kit Clement
  • Jason Dolor
  • Dana Kirin
  • Matthew Petersen
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Initial research has shown that simulating data from models created with computer software may enhance students’ understanding of concepts in introductory statistics; yet, there is little research investigating students’ development of statistical models. The research presented here examines small groups of students as they develop a model for a situation where a music teacher plays ten notes for a student who tries to guess each of the notes correctly. As students constructed their models and described their thinking, their descriptions were narrative in nature, focusing on the story of notes played and guessed. In this context, their focus on narrative appeared to support the development of productive statistical models. In addition, when students investigated pre-built TinkerPlots models, they preferred models that they perceived as more communicative or narrative in nature. These results have important pedagogical implications in terms of designing modeling curriculum.

Keywords

Statistics education Modeling Simulation Narrative TinkerPlots 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of National Science Foundation for this CAREER project (NSF REC 1453822). Any conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. We also wish to thank Andee Rubin for thoughtful feedback on students’ use of narrative.

References

  1. Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683–1707.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, M. C., & Rossiter, M. (2008). Narrative learning in adulthood. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119, 61–70.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobb, G. W. (2007). The introductory statistics course: A Ptolemaic curriculum? Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hb3k0nz.
  6. Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2975286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doerr, H. M., delMas, R., & Makar, K. (2017). A modeling approach to the development of students’ informal inferential reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 86–115.Google Scholar
  8. Doerr, H. M., & Pratt, D. (2008). The learning of mathematics and mathematical modeling. In M.K. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Research syntheses (pp. 259–285). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fuchs, H. U. (2015). From stories to scientific models and back: Narrative framing in modern macroscopic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 934–957.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garfield, J., delMas, B., & Zieffler, A. (2012). Developing statistical modelers and thinkers in an introductory tertiary-level statistics course. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(7), 883–898.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0447-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gil, E., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). Explanations and context in the emergence of students’ informal inferential reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 87–108.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hestenes, D. (2010). Modeling theory for math and science education. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 13–41). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klassen, S. (2009). The relation of story structure to a model of conceptual change in science learning. Science & Education, 19, 305–317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9212-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Konold, C., & Lehrer, R. (2008). Technology and mathematics education: An essay in honor of Jim Kaput. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd edn., pp. 49–72). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  16. Konold, C., & Miller, C. (2011). TinkerPlots™ Version 2.3 [Computer Software]. Amherst: Learn Troop.Google Scholar
  17. Laina, V., & Wilkerson, M. (2017). Modeling data by visualizing it. Proceedings of the 10th of the international forum for statistical reasoning, thinking and literacy, Rotorua.Google Scholar
  18. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lehrer, R. (2017). Modeling signal-noise processes supports student construction of a hierarchical image of sample. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 64–85.Google Scholar
  20. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mair, M., Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. W. (2015). Statistical practice: Putting society on display. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(3), 51–77.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414559058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, M. S. (2001). Models, stories and the economic world. Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(3), 361–384.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780110078972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nemirovsky, R. (1996). Mathematical narratives, modeling and algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 197–220). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolan, D., & Lang, D. T. (2010). Computing in the statistics curricula. The American Statistician, 64(2), 97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2010.09132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noll, J., & Kirin, D. (2016). Student approaches to constructing statistical models using TinkerPlots™. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 9(1). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/05b643r9.
  26. Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535–563.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pfannkuch, M., Budgett, S., Fewster, R., Fitch, M., Pattenwise, S., Wild, C., & Ziedins, I. (2016). Probability modeling and thinking: What can we learn from practice? Statistics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 11–37.Google Scholar
  28. Pfannkuch, M., & Wild, C. J. (2000). Statistical thinking and statistical practice: Themes gleaned from professional statisticians. Statistical Science, 15(2), 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sinclair, N., Healy, L., & Sales, C. O. R. (2009). Time for telling stories: Narrative thinking with dynamic technology. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 441–452.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0180-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Oers, B. (1997). On the narrative nature of young children’s iconic representations: Some evidence and implications. International Journal of Early Years Education, 5(3), 237–245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0966976970050305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical Education Research CenterCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Portland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options