Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 937–948 | Cite as

Renewing textbooks to align with reformed curriculum in former colonies: Ugandan school mathematics textbooks

  • Immaculate Kizito Namukasa
Original Article

Abstract

Several nations have reformed both their mathematics pedagogy and curriculum. The remaining challenge is to review teaching and learning resources to support the renewed pedagogy and curriculum. This paper responds to the following question: what pedagogy and curriculum are depicted in textbooks used in Uganda? Ugandan textbooks were analyzed in terms of mathematics content structure and genre, and presentation of written and non-written voice and looks (appearance). Whereas certain Ugandan mathematics textbooks used the narrative form and others chose to eliminate the use of extensive text, these textbooks include common characteristics such as spiral coverage of mathematics content. A few strides toward reform pedagogy, such as use of contexts familiar to learners in development of rules and concepts, were evinced among selected Uganda textbooks. More strides are needed in revising a majority of textbooks to align with the renewed curricula on certain aspects including integrating learning tools—digital and non-digital—within the textbook resources. A critical reflection on curriculum renewals adopted from other countries is needed when designing textbooks to match these renewals.

Keywords

Curriculum renewal School mathematics Africa Uganda Textbooks Curriculum materials Mathematics pedagogy Reform Former colonies 

References

  1. Bell (1949/1955, 1970/1984). Parr, H.E. School Mathematics, SM Books I for Senior 1 & 2 & Book II for Senior 3 & 4. London: Bell.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, A. J. (1997). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. In B. Ashcroft (Ed.), Post-colonial studies reader (pp. 71–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Cooney, T., Gofree, F., Stevens, M., & Nickson, M. (1985). The professional life of teachers. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(2), 24–30.Google Scholar
  4. Dowling, P. (1996). A sociological analysis of school mathematics texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ernest, P. (1999). Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fauvel, J. (1991). Textbooks, schemes and curricula. In D. Pimm & E. Love (Eds.), Teaching and learning school mathematics (pp. 108–123). London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  7. Flanders, J. R. (1994). Textbooks, teachers, and the SIMS test. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foxman, D. (1999). Mathematics textbooks across the world: Some evidence from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Slough: NFER.Google Scholar
  9. Gerdes, P. (1998). On culture and mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2012). Introduction. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources. Mathematics Teacher Education (Vol. 7, pp. ix–xii). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, D. L., & Smith, B. (1987). An evaluation of Saxon’s Algebra text. Journal of Educational Research, 81(2), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaahwa, J. B. (2006). A study of a mathematics teacher educator change. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  14. Kang, H. J. (2014). A cross-national comparative study of first- and fourth-grade math textbooks between Korea and the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 16(1), 91–108.Google Scholar
  15. Kanu, Y. (2003). Curriculum as cultural imagination: Post colonial imagination. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 67–81.Google Scholar
  16. Komakech, R. A., & Osuu, J. R. (2014). Uganda SESEMAT programme: Impact and challenges in its implementation. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6), 133–146.Google Scholar
  17. Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentation in American and Chinese textbooks. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). ‘This is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop et al., International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 317–409). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Mauch, K. E., & McDermott, M. (2007). Can elementary mathematics textbooks be improved to facilitate student understanding of mathematics? Mathematics and Computer Education, 41(2), 127–136.Google Scholar
  20. Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajka, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematics problem solving in Japan and the states. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 443–446.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, L. A., Greer, E. A., & Crummey, L. (1988). Elementary science textbooks: their contents, text characteristics, and comprehensibility. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 435–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, C. (1996). “The language of mathematics”: Towards a critical analysis of mathematics texts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(3), 2–10.Google Scholar
  23. Namukasa, I. K., Kaahwa, J., Quinn, M., & Ddungu, R. (2011). Critical curriculum renewal in Africa: The character of school mathematics in Uganda. In A. Abdi (Ed.), Decolonizing philosophies of education (pp. 177–193). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  24. Namukasa, I. K., Quinn, M., & Kaahwa, J. (2010). School mathematics education in Uganda: Its successes and its failures. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3104–3110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. NCDC. (1990/1992). Ordinary level secondary mathematics teaching syllabus. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  26. National Curriculum Development Centre (NCDC). (1991/2001). Uganda primary school curriculum. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  27. NCDC. (1999/2001). Uganda primary school curriculum. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  28. NCDC. (2008). Mathematics teaching syllabus, Uganda Certificate of Education, Senior 1–4. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  29. NCDC. (2008–2012). Primary school curriculum, Primary 1–7. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  30. NCDC. (2009a). Mathematics teaching syllabus, Uganda Certificate of Education, Primary 4. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  31. NCDC. (2009b). Mathematics teaching syllabus, Uganda Certificate of Education, Primary 5. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  32. NCDC. (2010). Mathematics teaching syllabus, Uganda Certificate of Education, Senior Primary 6. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  33. NCDC. (2012). Mathematics teaching syllabus, Uganda Certificate of Education, Primary 7. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  34. NCDC. (2013). Mathematics teaching syllabus, Uganda Advanced Certificate of Education, A-Level. Kampala: NCDC.Google Scholar
  35. NCDC. (2017). Uganda school curriculum. http://www.ncdc.go.ug/curriculum. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  36. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for teaching school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  37. Otte, M. (1983). Textual strategies. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(3), 15–28.Google Scholar
  38. Otte, M. (1986). What is a text? In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 173–203). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pepin, B., & Gueudet, G. (2014). Curriculum resources and textbooks in mathematics. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 132–135). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Quinn, M. (1983). Curriculum development in mathematics in some East African countries in the past twenty years. Master of Philosophy thesis. Pearson-Longman University.Google Scholar
  41. Read, T., Read, N., & Okwenu, J. (2008). Uganda—textbooks, school libraries and the provision of information and communication technologies for secondary schools: A roadmap for reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  42. Remillard, J. (1991). Is there an alternative? An analysis of commonly used and distinctive elementary mathematics curricula. Elementary subjects Center, series no. 31. ED 339 593.Google Scholar
  43. Remillard, J. T. (2012). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin & T. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources. Mathematics Teacher Education (Vol. 7, pp. 106–122). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Reys, B., Reys, R. E., & Koyama, M. (1996). The development of computation in three Japanese primary-grade textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. NCTM project (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Schubring, G. (2017). Mathematics teaching in the process of decolonization. In K. Bjarnadóttir, F. Furinghetti, M. Menghini, J. Prytz, and G. Schubring (Eds.), Dig where you stand, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the History of Mathematics Education (pp. 349–368), University of Turin, Italy. Roma: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.Google Scholar
  48. Tarnau, S. (1980). The mathematical textbook for young students. International Journal of Instructional Media, 8, 393–407.Google Scholar
  49. Tarr, J. E., Chavez, O., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students’ opportunities to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Dormolen, J. (1986). Textual analysis. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 141–171). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vithal, R., & Volmink, J. (2005). Mathematics curriculum research: Roots, reforms, reconciliation and relevance. In R. Vithal, J. Adler & C. Keitel (Eds.), Researching mathematics education in South Africa: Perspectives, practices and possibilities. Cape Town: HSRC.Google Scholar
  53. Woodward, A. (1986). Photographs in textbooks more than pretty pictures. In A paper presented at the 67th annual meeting of American Educational Research association. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. Wu, M., Park, K., & Leung, K. S. F. (2006). Curriculum introduction. In F. K. S. Leug, K. D. Graf & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 153–158). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations