Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 881–892 | Cite as

A semiotic interpretation of the derivative concept in a textbook

  • Lourdes Maria Werle de Almeida
  • Karina Alessandra Pessoa da Silva
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Differential and integral calculus textbooks are widely used as the main resource for teaching. They appear in a variety of forms and adopt various approaches to present the content. In this paper, we turn our attention to one chapter of a calculus textbook and our focus is on the introduction of the derivative concept. With the purpose of examining the presentation of the derivative concept in the textbook, we give a view of Peirce’s semiotics, in particular of his classification of sign-vehicles. The analysis allows us to point out that the sign-vehicle in relation to the derivative concept may be iconic, indexical, or symbolic. These do not constitute mutually exclusive kinds of signs, but they are interrelated in such a way that we can identify iconicity in indexicality and indexicality in symbolicity. We conclude that the textbook has the potential to enable students to conceptualize the derivative. However, in some aspects, the book may constrain students’ conceptualization and it could be improved to meet the students’ needs to make meaning of the derivative concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Almeida, L. M. W., & Silva, K. A. P. (2017). A Ação dos Signos e o Conhecimento dos Alunos em Atividades de Modelagem Matemática. (Sign action and student knowledge in mathematical modeling activities). Bolema, 31(57), 202–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender, P., & Schreiber, A. (1985). Operative Genese der Geometrie. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
  4. Colapietro, V. (2004). The routes of significance: reflections on peirce’s theory of interpretants. Cognitio, 5(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
  5. Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2006). What is a “semiotic perspective”, and what could it be? Some comments on the contributions to this special issue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffmann, M. H. G., & Roth, W. M. (2007). The complementarity of a representational and an epistemological function of signs in scientific activity. Semiotica, 164(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  7. Kadunz, G. (2016a). Geometry, a means of argumentation. In A. Sáenz-Ludlow & G. Kadunz (Eds.), Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics: How to describe the construction, visualisation, and communication of mathematical concepts (pp. 25–42). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kadunz, G. (2016b). Diagrams as means for learning. In A. Sáenz-Ludlow & G. Kadunz (Eds.), Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics: How to describe the construction, visualisation, and communication of mathematical concepts (pp. 111–126). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kilpatrick, J. (2014). From clay tablet to computer tablet: The evolution of school mathematics textbooks. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 (ICMT-2014) (pp. 3–12). UK: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  10. Lue, Y. T. (2014). Development of curriculum units for a basic course for calculus. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 (ICMT-2014) (pp. 311–318). UK: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  11. Nöth, W. (2008). Panorama da semiótica: de Platão a Peirce (Panorama of semiotics: From Plato to Peirce). São Paulo: Annablume.Google Scholar
  12. Otte, M. (2001). ‘Mathematical epistemology from a semiotic point of view’. In: Proceedings of Discussion Group on Semiotics in Mathematics Education at the 25th PME International Conference (pp. 12–17). University of Utrecht: Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Otte, M. (2006). Mathematical epistemology from a Peircean semiotic point of view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Otte, M. (2008). The analytic/synthetic distinction and Peirce’s conception of mathematics. In R. Fabbrichesi & S. Marietti (Eds.), Semiotics and philosophy in Charles Sanders Peirce (pp. 51–88). Cambridge: Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Peirce, C. S. (1972). Semiótica e Filosofia: textos escolhidos. (Semiotics and philosophy: Chosen texts). São Paulo: Cultrix.Google Scholar
  16. Peirce, C. S. (1992). The essential Peirce (Vol. 1). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Peirce, C. S. (2005). Semiotic: The collected papers. São Paulo: Perspectiva.Google Scholar
  18. Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: Two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 685–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Presmeg, N., Radford, L., Roth, W. M., & Kadunz, G. (2016). Semiotics in mathematics education. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Hamburg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Semiotics and the “connections” standard: Significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Presmeg, N. C. (2008). Trigonometric connections through a Semiotic Lens. In L. Radford, G. Schubring & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 103–119). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2008). The ubiquitousness of signs. In L. Radford, G. Schubring & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. vii-x). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Radu, M. (2008). Symbolic language versus understanding in mathematics education: a brief archaeological investigation mathematics education discourse. In L. Radford, G. Schubring & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 249–261). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Randahl, M., & Grevholm, B. (2010). Learning opportunities in a classical calculus book. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15(2), 5–27.Google Scholar
  25. Richit, A., Richit, A., & Farias, M. R. (2014). Differential and integral calculus in textbooks: an analysis from the point of view of digital technologies. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 (ICMT-2014) (pp. 407–414). UK: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  26. Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Kadunz, G. (2016). Constructing knowledge seen as a semiotic activity. In A. Sáenz-Ludlow & G. Kadunz (Eds.), Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics: How to describe the construction, visualisation, and communication of mathematical concepts (pp. 1–21). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Zellweger, S. (2016). Classroom mathematics activity when it is seen as an inter-intra double semiotic process of interpretation. In A. Sáenz-Ludlow & G. Kadunz (Eds.), Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics: How to describe the construction, visualisation, and communication of mathematical concepts (pp. 43–66). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Santaella, L. (2008). A Teoria Geral dos Signos: como as linguagens significam as coisas. In (General theory of signs: How languages mean things). São Paulo: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  29. Steinbring, H. (2006). What makes a sign a Mathematical Sign? An epistemological perspective on mathematical interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stewart, J. (2009). Calculus (6th edn.). Belmont: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  31. Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircian epistemology. Transactions of Charles S. Peirce Society, 36(3), 357–384.Google Scholar
  32. Tall, D. (1992). Students’ difficulties in calculus. In: Proceedings of Working Group 3 of the 7th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 13–28). Quebec: Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Weigand, H. G. (2014). A discrete approach to the concept of derivative. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(4), 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wells, R. (1967). Distinctively human semiotic. Social Science Information, 6(6), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lourdes Maria Werle de Almeida
    • 1
  • Karina Alessandra Pessoa da Silva
    • 2
  1. 1.State University of LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
  2. 2.Federal Technological University of ParanáParanáBrazil

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options