, Volume 50, Issue 7, pp 1213–1222 | Cite as

Students’ construction and use of statistical models: a socio-critical perspective

  • Lucía Zapata-CardonaEmail author
Original Article


This paper addresses how students explore, construct, validate and use statistical models when facing situations designed from a socio-critical perspective. The case study used is a statistics lesson designed by a statistics teacher and a researcher. The lesson centers on nutritional information and was implemented in a 7th-grade classroom at a public school in a Northwest Colombian city. In small groups, students gathered their own data, and subsequently organized and analyzed the data, and presented their findings to the class. The main sources of data were students’ discourse in the classroom, students’ artifacts and the researcher’s journal. The findings describe a route in which students explore, construct, use, and validate their models. The results elaborate the technological and the reflective knowledge that took place in the model building activity.


Socio-critical perspective of modelling Statistical models Statistics education 



This research was carried out with financial support of Universidad de Antioquia Research Committee—CODI and Colciencias research Grant 438-2017. Special thanks to the reviewers for their meaningful and insightful suggestions in previous versions of this paper. Likewise, special thanks to Mónica Parra-Zapata for her priceless support in the data collection process, to Kenneth Hall and Jill Fielding-Wells for their invaluable support with helpful comments in the editing and to the incredible students for their openness and availability to participate in the study.


  1. Aridor, K., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2017). The co-emergence of aggregate and modelling reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 38–63.Google Scholar
  2. Barbosa, J. (2006). Mathematical modelling in classroom: A socio-critical and discursive perspective. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campos, C. R. (2016). La educación estadística y la educación crítica [Statistics education and critical education]. In Segundo Encuentro Colombiano de Educación Estocástica (2 ECEE). Colombia: Bogotá.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, G., & Moore, D. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 801–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doerr, H., delMas, R., & Makar, K. (2017). A modeling approach to the development of students’ informal inferential reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 86–115.Google Scholar
  6. English, L. D. (2012). Data modelling with first-grade students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Learning to reason about statistical models and modelling. In J. Garfield & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), Developing students’statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice (pp. 143–163). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould, R., Bargagliotti, A., & Johnson, T. (2017). An analysis of secondary teachers’ reasoning with participatory sensing data. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 305–334.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, R., Johnson, T., Moncada-Machado, S., & Molyneux, J. (2015). Modeling with “big data” in secondary schools. An exploratory study. In D. Ben-Zvi & K. Makar (Eds.), Reasoning about models and modelling in the context of informal statistical inference (pp. 176–188). Paderborn: SRTL-9.Google Scholar
  10. Hernández-Carrera, R. (2014). Qualitative research through interviews: Its analysis by Grounded Theory. Cuestiones Pedagógicas, 23, 187–210.Google Scholar
  11. Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Konold, C., Finzer, W., & Kreetong, K. (2017). Modeling as a core component of structuring data. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 191–212.Google Scholar
  13. Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: a sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 82–105.Google Scholar
  15. McCullagh, P. (2002). What is a statistical model? The Annals of Statistics, 30(5), 1225–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pfannkuch, M., Budgett, S., Fewster, R., Fitch, M., Pattenwise, S., Wild, C., & Ziedins, I. (2016). Probability modeling and thinking: What can we learn from practice? Statistics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 11–37.Google Scholar
  17. Radford, L. (2006). Elementos de una teoría cultural de la objetivación [Elements of a Cultural Theory of Objectification]. Revista Relime, Número Especial, 103–129.Google Scholar
  18. Radford, L. (2016). The theory of objectification and its place among sociocultural research in mathematics education. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (RIPEM), 6(2), 187–206.Google Scholar
  19. Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds: The global evolution of an emerging field of research and practice (pp. 3–25). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skovsmose, O. (1990). Mathematical education and democracy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(2), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Skovsmose, O. (1992). Democratic competence and reflective knowing in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(2), 2–11.Google Scholar
  22. Skovsmose, O. (1999). Hacia una filosofía de la educación matemática crítica [Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education]. (P. Valero, Trad.) Bogotá: Una Empresa Docente (Trabajo original publicado en 1994).Google Scholar
  23. Watson, J. M. (2007). Inference as prediction. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(1), 6–11.Google Scholar
  24. Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry (with discussion). International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations