Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 1013–1027 | Cite as

Using a transdisciplinary framework to examine mathematics classroom talk taking place in and through a second language

  • Sally-Ann Robertson
  • Mellony Graven
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

This paper proposes a transdisciplinary framework to allow for a multifocal exploration of classroom talk practices. It draws on data from a broader study of talk in South African Grade 4 mathematics classrooms where the language of teaching and learning (English) was the home language for neither the teachers nor their students. Lesson transcript data from one teacher’s lessons on fractions are used to demonstrate how working with three strands of conceptual insight from the disciplines of psychology, sociology and linguistics conduces to a potentially richer understanding of a teacher’s use of classroom talk in mediating her students’ mathematical understanding. By drawing on elements of Vygotsky’s sociocultural psychology, we make visible in the lesson data the ways in which this teacher used the ‘everyday’ in trying to navigate her students’ towards more ‘scientific’ conceptualizations of unit fractions. By then taking up aspects of Bernstein’s sociological work, we articulate, and make visible, how societal circumstances impinge on students’ access to exploratory mathematical discourse needed for epistemological access to abstract and generalized mathematical concepts. Finally, through Halliday’s work on the power of particular linguistic registers for meaning-making, we highlight challenges in learning mathematics in and through a second language and reveal the constraints placed on students’ opportunity to maximally exploit the distinct forms of meaning contained within the mathematics register.

Keywords

Transdisciplinarity Mathematics classroom talk Spontaneous and scientific concepts Recognition and realization rules Mathematics register 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bernstein, B. (1959). A public language: Some sociological implications of a linguistic form. British Journal of Sociology, 10(4), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control (Vol. 1): Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B. (1972). Can education compensate for society? In A. Cashdan, G. M. Esland, E. Grugeon, A. E. Harris, V. J. Oates & D. C. Stringer (Eds.), Language in education: A source book (pp. 213–218). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, B. (1973). A brief account of the theory of codes. In V. Lee (Ed.), Social relationships and language: Some aspects of the work of Basil Bernstein (pp. 65–79). Bletchley: The Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, B. (1993). Foreword. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Charting the agenda: Educational activity after Vygotsky (pp. xiii–xxiii). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, B. (1995). A response. In A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The Sociology of Basil Bernstein (pp. 385–424). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised edn.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Calcagni, E., & Lago, L. (in press). The three domains for dialogue: A framework for analyzing dialogic approaches to teaching and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, B. (1998). Using Bernstein and Bourdieu to understand children’s difficulties with “realistic” mathematics testing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Basic Education. (2010). The status of the language of learning and teaching (LOLT) in South African public schools: A qualitative overview. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.Google Scholar
  14. Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graven, M. (2014). Poverty, inequality and mathematics performance: The case of South Africa’s post-apartheid context. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(7), 1039–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graven, M., & Coles, A. (2017). Resisting the desire for the unambiguous: Productive gaps in researcher, teacher and student interpretations of a number story task. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halliday, M. A. K. (1974) Some aspects of sociolinguistics. In Interactions between linguistics and mathematical education. Final Report of the Symposium sponsored by UNESCO, CEDO and ICMI (pp. 64–73). Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). On grammar (Volume 1 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. edited by J. J. Webster). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. Halliday, M. A. K. (2008). Complementarities in language. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  22. Halliday, M. A. K., & Burns, A. (2006). Applied linguistics: Thematic pursuits or disciplinary moorings? A conversation between Michael Halliday and Anne Burns. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 113–128.Google Scholar
  23. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edn.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Hasan, R. (1995). On social conditions for semiotic mediation: The genesis of mind in society. In A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The Sociology of Basil Bernstein (pp. 171–196). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  25. Hasan, R. (2005). Language, society and consciousness (The Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, edited by J. Webster) (Vol. 1). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  26. Hoadley, U. (2007). The reproduction of social class inequalities through mathematics pedagogies in South African primary schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(6), 679–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoadley, U., & Muller, J. (2010). Codes, pedagogy and knowledge: Advances in Bernsteinian sociology of education. In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball & L. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 69–78). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Jorgensen, R. (2013). School mathematics as a “game”: Being explicit and consistent. In M. Berger, K. Brophy, V. Frith & K. Le Roux (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international mathematics education and society conference (Vol. 2, pp. 330–339). Cape Town: MES7.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, Y. S., Park, Y. S., & Ginsburg, H. (2016). Socio-economic status differences in mathematics accuracy, strategy use, and profiles in the early years of schooling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(7), 1065–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lemke, J. L. (2003). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (Vol. 1, pp. 215–234). Legas.Google Scholar
  31. Lerman, S. (1998). A moment in the zoom of a lens: Towards a discursive psychology of mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 66–81). Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  32. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19–44). Westport: Ablex.Google Scholar
  33. Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lerman, S. (2014). Doing educational research with Vygotsky’s theoretical framework. Public lecture, Rhodes University, Grahamstown. [Lecture Transcript] Grahamstown: SANCP, Rhodes UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, J. R. (2008). Bridging troubled waters: interdisciplinarity and what makes it stick [PowerPoint slides]. In Plenary address presented at the Disciplinarity, Knowledge and Language Conference, University of Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, J. R. (2011). Bridging troubled waters: Interdisciplinarity and what makes it stick. In F. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistics and sociological perspectives (pp. 35–61). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  37. Maton, K. (2011). Theories and things: The semantics of disciplinarity. In F. Christie & K. Maton, K (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Systemic functional and sociological perspectives (pp. 62–84). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  38. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of Transdisciplinarity: Levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
  40. Nomlomo, V. (2006). Parents’ choice of the medium of instruction in science: A case of one primary school in the Western Cape of South Africa. In B. Brock-Utne, Z. Desai & M. Qorro (Eds.), Focus on fresh data on the language of instruction debate in Tanzania and South Africa (pp. 112–137). Somerset West: African Minds.Google Scholar
  41. O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). The semantic hyperspace: Accumulating mathematical knowledge across semiotic resources and modalities. In F. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 217–236). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  42. Pausigere, P., & Graven, M. (2014). Learning metaphors and learning stories (stelos) of teachers participating in an in-service numeracy community of practice. Education as Change, 18(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 127–139). Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  44. Pirie, S. E. B. (1997). The use of talk in mathematics. In B. Davies & C. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 3: Oral discourse and education) (pp. 229–238). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  45. Probyn, M. (2009). ‘Smuggling the vernacular into the classroom’: Conflicts and tensions in classroom code switching in township/rural schools in South Africa. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(2), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Renshaw, P. (2004). Dialogic learning teaching and instruction: Theoretical roots and analytical frameworks. In J. van der Linden & P. D. Renshaw (Eds.), Dialogic learning: Shifting perspectives on learning instruction and teaching (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  47. Renshaw, P., & Brown, R. (2007). Formats of classroom talk for integrating everyday and scientific discourse: Replacement, interweaving, contextual privileging and pastiche. Language and Education: An International Journal, 21(6), 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robertson, S.-A. (2017). The place of language in supporting children’s mathematical development: Two Grade 4 teachers’ use of classroom talk. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  49. Robertson, S.-A., & Graven, M. (submitted paper). A socio-linguistic perspective on the challenges of facilitating exploratory mathematics talk in and through a second language. Educational Studies in Mathematics (Special Issue: Rituals and Explorations in Mathematical Teaching and Learning) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  50. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Language in mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. In J. N. Moschkovich (Ed.), Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research (pp. 73–112). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Setati, M. (2008). Access to mathematics versus access to the language of power: The struggle in multilingual mathematics classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 28(1), 103–116.Google Scholar
  53. Simon, M. A. (2009). Amidst multiple theories of learning in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 477–490.Google Scholar
  54. Vygotsky, L. S. (1930). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). Extracts from thought and language and mind and society. In B. Steirer & J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice (pp. 45–58). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  57. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options