Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 367–379 | Cite as

Understanding Instructional Quality Through a Relational Lens

  • Rebekah Berlin
  • Julie Cohen
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze mathematics lessons using the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS), a standardized observation protocol that suggests that high-quality lessons are distinguished by the tenor and frequency of classroom interactions. Because the CLASS focuses on interactions, rather than the specifics of content teaching, it can be used across content areas from language arts to mathematics. While many previous studies have used CLASS as a measure of instructional quality, to date, no work has examined the affordances and constraints of using the content-agnostic CLASS to examine instructional quality in mathematics lessons. Our close qualitative analysis of three lessons highlights the importance of including practices that cut across content areas in measurement of instructional quality in mathematics classrooms. In addition, this paper is the first to highlight aspects of instruction in mathematics classrooms that are obscured by the CLASS. Discussion highlights how a relational lens foregrounds particular instructional aspects and marginalizes others.

Keywords

Mathematics instruction Classroom observation And general versus content-specific pedagogy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acock, A. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O’Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65(1), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J., Marsh, P., McFarland, C., McElhaney, K., Land, D., & Jodi, K. (2002). Attachment and autonomy as predictors of the development of social skills and delinquency during midadolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(1), 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., & Qi, Y. (2012). An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment, 17(2–3), 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blazar, D., Braslow, D., Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2017). Attending to general and mathematics-specific dimensions of teaching: Exploring factors across two observation instruments. Educational Assessment, 22(2), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman, B., & Stott, F. (1994). Understanding development in a cultural context: The challenge for teachers. In B. L. Mallory & R. S. New (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn:. In Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brophy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charalambous, C. Y., & Litke, E. (2018). Studying instructional quality by using a content-specific lens: The case of the mathematical quality of instruction framework. ZDM Mathematics Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0913-9.Google Scholar
  16. Charalambous, C. Y., Praetorius, A.-K. (2018). Studying mathematics instruction through different lenses: setting the ground for understanding instructional quality more comprehensively. ZDM Mathematics Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0914-8.Google Scholar
  17. Danielson Group. (2017). The framework. https://www.danielsongroup.org/framework. Accessed 1 May 2017.
  18. Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The psychology of problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downer, J. T., López, M. L., Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, A., Pianta, R. C., & Howes, C. (2012). Observations of teacher–child interactions in classrooms serving Latinos and dual language learners: Applicability of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System in diverse settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 125–153). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. English, L. D., & Kirshner, D. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Ford, D. H., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Good, T. L., & Grouws, D. A. (1977). Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth-grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., & Downer, J. T. (2007). Building a science of classrooms: Application of the CLASS framework in over 4,000 US early childhood and elementary classrooms. Research paper, Foundation for Childhood Development. https://www.fcd-us.org/building-a-science-of-classrooms-application-of-the-class-framework-in-over-4000-u-s-early-childhood-and-elementary-classrooms/. Accessed 20 Apr 2017.
  28. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., … & Brackett, M. A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain-specific elements of teacher–child interactions: Associations with preschool children’s development. Child Development, 85(3), 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill, H., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoy, A. W., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Student and teacher perspectives on classroom management. In C. Everston & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 181–222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Hu, B. Y., Fan, X., Gu, C., & Yang, N. (2016). Applicability of the classroom assessment scoring system in Chinese preschools based on psychometric evidence. Early Education and Development, 27(5), 714–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Research paper, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540960.pdf.
  35. Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, C. D. (2007). Culture, literacy, and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  37. Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M. (1981). Improving children’s prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (Eds.), Children’s prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44–71). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  38. Leyva, D., Weiland, C., Barata, M., Yoshikawa, H., Snow, C., Treviño, E., & Rolla, A. (2015). Teacher–child interactions in Chile and their associations with prekindergarten outcomes. Child Development, 86(3), 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  40. Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCaffrey, D. F., Yuan, K., Savitsky, T. D., Lockwood, J. R., & Edelen, M. O. (2015). Uncovering multivariate structure in classroom observations in the presence of rater errors. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(2), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McClellan, C., Donoghue, J., & Park, Y. S. (2013). Commonality and uniqueness in teaching practice observation. Research paper, Clowder Consulting. http://www.clowderconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Commonality-and-Uniqueness-in-Teaching-Practice-Observation_paper.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
  43. National Research Council. (2003). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., Kiuru, N., Siekkinen, M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Nurmi, J. E. (2010). A validation of the classroom assessment scoring system in finnish kindergartens. Early Education and Development, 21(1), 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. (2012). Classroom Assessment Scoring System Upper Elementary Manual. Charlottesville, VA: Teachstone.Google Scholar
  47. Raver, C. C. (2004). Placing emotional self-regulation in sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts. Child Development, 75(2), 346–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(5), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sandilos, L., Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Cohen, J. (2017). Warmth and demand: The relation between students’ perceptions of the classroom environment and achievement growth. Child Development, 88(4), 1321–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Connell, J. P., Eccles, J. S., & Wellborn, J. G. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i-231.Google Scholar
  52. Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 177–198). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.Google Scholar
  56. Walkowiak, T. A., Berry, R. Q., Meyer, J. P., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Ottmar, E. R. (2014). Introducing an observational measure of standards-based mathematics teaching practices: Evidence of validity and score reliability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walkowiak, T. A., Berry, R. Q., Pinter, H. H., & Jacobson, E. D. (2018). Utilizing the M-Scan to measure standards based mathematics teaching practices: affordances and limitations. ZDM Mathematics Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0931-7.Google Scholar
  58. Yair, G. (2000). Educational battlefields in America: The tug-of-war over students’ engagement with instruction. Sociology of Education, 73(4), 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options