Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 77–89 | Cite as

Socio-epistemological research on mathematical modelling: an empirical approach to teaching and learning

  • Ricardo Cantoral
  • Angélica Moreno-Durazo
  • Mario Caballero-Pérez
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

This work deals with the role of social practice in the construction of models related to advanced mathematical knowledge; specifically, with the way an individual uses the notion of variation in different phenomena while predictive thinking is the underlying principle in the mathematical process. The mathematical modelling of successive variation in mathematics and science is addressed through the interpretation of graphs in two cases of different nature: the diagnosis of a cardiologist on the health of a patient (a non-deterministic phenomenon) and the arguments of high school students facing the task of filling containers (a deterministic phenomenon). An emerging theory in the field of mathematics education—the socio-epistemological theory—explains the problem of construction of mathematical knowledge. The constructs of this theory are elaborated with an empirical basis; and the legitimacy of all forms of knowledge is assumed, be this knowledge popular, technical or scientific, since all of them constitute human wisdom. (In contrast, other contemporary approaches examine only one of the forms of knowledge).

Keywords

Social practice Mathematical modelling Variational thinking and language 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Almuna, F.-J. (2017). The role of context and context familiarity on mathematics problems. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 20(3), 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrieta, J., & Díaz, L. (2015). A modeling perspective from socioepistemology. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 18(1), 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blum, W. (1996). Anwendungsbez€uge im Mathematikunterricht–Trends und Perspektiven. In G. Kadunz, H. Kautschitsch, G. Ossimitz & E. Schneider (Eds.), Trends und Perspektiven (pp. 15—38). Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 15–30). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caballero, M., & Cantoral, R. (2017). Una caracterización de la noción sistema de referencia para el tratamiento del cambio y la variación. E. L. A. Serna (Eds.), Acta Latinoamericana de Matemática Educativa (Vol. 30) (pp. 1057–1065). México: Comité Latinoamericano de Matemática Educativa.Google Scholar
  6. Cantoral, R. (2013). Teoría Socioepistemológica de la Matemática Educativa. Estudios sobre construcción social del conocimiento. Barcelona: Gedisa (2016 2nd ed.).Google Scholar
  7. Cantoral, R., & Farfán, R. (1998). Pensamiento y lenguaje variacional en la introducción al análisis. Epsilon, 42, 353–369.Google Scholar
  8. Farfán, R. (2012). Socioepistemología y Ciencia. El caso del estado estacionario y su matematización. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  9. Foster, B. (2007). Twelve–Lead electrocardiography. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Girnat, B., & Eichler, A. (2011). Secondary teachers’ beliefs on modelling in geometry and stochastics. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo, G. Ferri & Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 75–84). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haines, C., Crouch, R., & Davis, J. (2000). Mathematical modelling skills: A research instrument. Technical Report No 55, University of Hertfordshire: Department of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  12. Kaiser, G. (2007). Mathematical modelling and applications in education. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 396–404). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(3), 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lobelo, R., Hernández, A., González, J., & Moro, C. (2001). Bloqueo Aurículo–Ventricular. Medicine, 8(40), 2125–2131.Google Scholar
  15. Moreno–Durazo, A., & Cantoral, R. (2017). El uso de los órdenes superiores de variación en la interpretación clínica del electrocardiograma. In L. A. Serna (Ed.), Acta Latinoamericana de Matemática Educativa 30, 927–935. México: Comité Latinoamericano de Matemática Educativa.Google Scholar
  16. Moreno–Durazo, G., & Cantoral, R. (2016). Pensamiento y lenguaje variacional en la práctica médica. El caso de la “lectura” del electrocardiograma. In F. Rodríguez, R. Rodríguez & L. Sosa (Eds.), Investigación e Innovación en Matemática Educativa (Vol. 1(1)), (pp. 238–245). Oaxaca: Red de Centros de Investigación en Matemática Educativa A. C.Google Scholar
  17. Piaget, J. (1971). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  18. Piaget, J. (1977). Understanding causality. New York: Norton Library.Google Scholar
  19. Piaget, J. (1978). El desarrollo de la noción de tiempo en el niño. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics Education DepartmentCinvestav, IPNMexico cityMexico

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options