Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 975–986 | Cite as

Elaborating the later Vygotsky’s radical initiative on the nature and function of language: implications for mathematics education

  • Wolff-Michael Roth
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Scholars interested in the function of language in mathematical learning often draw on Vygotsky, whose early work on word meaning has shaped many research studies. However, near the end of a rather short life, Vygotsky heavily critiqued his own previous work and began to sketch a radical theory revision, which overturns much of what he had done and is famous for. The purpose of the present study is to elaborate a possible avenue of such a theoretical revision. This study develops the new theory in the course of an exemplary analysis. The data derive from a scientific laboratory, where three scientists discuss a graph as it evolves in real time before their eyes and as a result of transformations designed to recover the real signal from the noise that is apparently present. Implications of the emerging theory for mathematics education are discussed.

Keywords

Vygotsky Language Mediation Sense-giving field 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Data collection was made possible with the aid of a joint grant from the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

References

  1. Barwell, R. (2016). Formal and informal mathematical discourses: Bakhtin and Vygotsky, dialogue and dialectic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  3. Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, M., Sawrey, A., K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2017). A progression in first-grade children’s thinking about variable and variable notation in functional relationships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobb, P., & Tzou, C. (2009). Supporting students’ learning about data generation. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Mathematical representation at the interface of body and culture (pp. 135–170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Coutat, S., Laborde, C., & Richard, P. R. (2016). L’apprentissage instrumenté de propriétés en géométrie: propédeutique à l’acquisition d’une compétence de démonstration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson, D. (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. Lepore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation (pp. 433–446). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. El’konin, B. D. (1994). Vvedenie v psixologiju razvitija: B tradicii kul’turno-istoričeskoj teorii L. S. Vygotskogo. Moscow: Trivola.Google Scholar
  8. Hárosi, F. I. (1987). Cynomolgus and Rhesus monkey visual pigments: Application of Fourier Transform smoothing and statistical techniques to the determination of spectral parameters. Journal of General Physiology, 89, 717–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of imagination, reason, and meaning. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Werke Band 3. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  12. Matusov, E. (2011). Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mead, G. H. (1938). Philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mead, G. H. (1972). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). Sens et non-sens. Paris: Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mikhailov, F. T. (2001). The ‘Other Within’ for the psychologist. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 39(1), 6–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nancy, J.-L. (2008). Corpus. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Planas, N., Chronaki, A., Rønning, F., & Schütte, M. (2015). Challenges and research priorities in the context of TWG09: Mathematics and Language. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1318–1324). Prague: Charles University and ERME.Google Scholar
  20. Radford, L. (2012). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Radford, L. (2016). The theory of objectification and its place among sociocultural research in mathematics education. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 187–206.Google Scholar
  22. Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2011). Signifying and meaning-making in mathematical thinking, teaching, and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ricœur, P. (1986). Du texte à l’action: Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roth, W.-M. (2004). Perceptual gestalts in workplace communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1037–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roth, W.-M. (2005). Making classifications (at) work: Ordering practices in science. Social Studies of Science, 35, 581–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth, W.-M. (2009). Radical uncertainty in scientific discovery work. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roth, W.-M. (2014a). An integrated theory of thinking and speaking that draws on Vygotsky and Bakhtin/Vološinov. Dialogical Pedagogy, 1, 32–53.Google Scholar
  29. Roth, W.-M. (2014b). Graphing and uncertainty in the discovery sciences: With implications for STEM education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Roth, W.-M. (2015). Meaning and the real life of language: Learning from “pathological” cases in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 30, 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roth, W.-M. (2016). On the social nature of mathematical reasoning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(2), 34–39.Google Scholar
  32. Roth, W.-M. (2017). The mathematics of mathematics: Thinking with the late, Spinozist Vygotsky. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schütz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Vienna: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Takeuchi, M. A. (2017). Power and identity in immigrant parents’ involvement in early years mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9781-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Venkat, H., & Askew, M. (2017). Mediating primary mathematics: Theory, concepts, and a framework for studying practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9776-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vološinov, V. N. (1930). Marksizm i folosofija jazyka: osnovye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda b nauke o jazyke. Leningrad: Priboj.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vygotsky, L. S. (2010). Two fragments of personal notes by L. S. Vygotsky from the Vygotsky family archive. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Yasnitsky, A., & Van der Veer R. (Eds.) (2016). Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Zavershneva, E. I. (2010). The Vygotsky family archive: New findings. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zavershneva, E. I. (2014). The problem of consciousness in Vygotsky’s cultural-historical psychology. In A. Yasnitsky, R. Van der Veer & M. Ferrari (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 63–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options