Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 287–300 | Cite as

Towards a professional development framework for mathematical modelling: the case of Singapore teachers

  • NG Kit Ee Dawn
Original Article

Abstract

Despite the incorporation of mathematical modelling in the Singapore mathematics curriculum framework since 2007, Singapore teachers still face readiness issues concerning the use of open-ended real-world problems. This paper presents some preliminary findings from an exploratory study undertaken within a professional development programme on mathematical modelling for experienced secondary mathematics teachers who are tasked to lead their schools in mathematical modelling. The research aims to gain insights into teachers’ efforts at designing and assessing modelling activities, and their perceptions about facilitation challenges, for the purpose of proposing future directions in professional development towards more sustained, concerted efforts at incorporating mathematical modelling in Singapore schools.

Keywords

Mathematical modelling Professional development Real-world problems Secondary school Teacher education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Singapore Ministry of Education and all the teacher participants of the PD programme.

References

  1. Ang, K. C. (2006). Mathematical modelling: Technology and H3 mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 9(2), 33–47.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, K. C. (2009). Mathematical modelling in the secondary and junior college classroom. Singapore: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Ang, K. C. (2015). Mathematical modelling in Singapore schools: A framework for instruction. In N. H. Lee & K. E. D. Ng (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: From theory to practice (1st edn., pp. 57–72). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blomhøj, M. (2011). Modelling competency: Teaching, learning and assessing competencies. In G. Kaiser, G. W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 343–348). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blomhøj, M., & Kjeldsen, T. H. (2006). Teaching mathematical modelling through project work: Experiences from an in-service course for upper secondary teachers. ZDM, 38(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blum, G. W. (1996). Anwendungsbezüge im mathematikunterricht–Trends und perspektiven. Schriftenreihe Didaktik de Mathematik, 23, 15–38.Google Scholar
  7. Borromeo Ferri, R., & Blum, G. W. (2010). Insights into teachers’ unconscious behaviour in modelling contexts. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. Haines & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 423–432). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R., Redmond, T., Sheehy, J., & Lang, D. (2015). Mathematical modelling—An example from an inter-school modelling challenge. In N. H. Lee & K. E. D. Ng (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: From theory to practice (pp. 143–160). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, C. M. E. (2008). Using model-eliciting activities for primary mathematics classrooms. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1/2), 47–66.Google Scholar
  10. Chan, C. M. E. (2009). Mathematical modelling as problem solving for children in the Singapore mathematics classroom. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(1), 36–61.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, C. M. E. (2013). Initial perspectives of teacher professional development on mathematical modelling in Singapore: Conceptions of mathematical modelling. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 405–414). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan, C. M. E., Ng, K. E. D., Widjaja, W., & Seto, C. (2012). Assessment of primary 5 students’ mathematical modelling competencies. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 35(2), 146–178.Google Scholar
  13. Curriculum Planning and Development Division [CPDD]. (2012a). Secondary mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  14. Curriculum Planning and Development Division [CPDD]. (2012b). Mathematical modelling resource kit. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  15. de Oliveira, A. M. P., & Barbosa, J. C. (2010). Mathematical modeling and the teachers’ tensions. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling studentsmathematical modeling competencies: proceedings of the 13th international conference for the teaching of modelling and applications (pp. 511–517). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Dindyal, J. (2009). Applications and modelling for the primary mathematics classrooms. Singapore: Pearson.Google Scholar
  17. Doerr, H., & Lesh, R. (2011). Models and modelling perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics in the twenty-first century. In G. Kaiser, G. W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 247–268). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doerr, H. M. (2007). What knowledge do teachers need for teaching mathematics through applications and modellng? In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 69–78). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galbraith, P. (2006). Real world problems: Developing principles of design. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), 29th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia: Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Vol. 1, pp. 229–236). Canberra: MERGA.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  21. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  22. Julie, C., & Mudaly, V. (2007). Mathematical modelling of social issues in school mathematics in South Africa. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 503–510). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaiser, G., & Schwarz, B. (2006). Mathematical modelling as bridge between school and university. ZDM (Part A), 38(2), pp. 196–208.Google Scholar
  24. Kaiser, G., & Schwarz, B. (2010). Authentic modelling problems in mathematics education–Examples and experiences. Journal Fur Mathematik-Didaktic, 31(1), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaiser, G., Schwarz, B., & Tiedemann, S. (2010). Future teachers’ professional knowledge on modeling. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling studentsmathematical modeling competencies: Proceedings of the 13th international conference for the teaching of modelling and applications (pp. 433–444). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM, 38(3), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kwek, M. L., & Ko, H. C. (2011). The teaching and learning of mathematical modelling in a secondary school. In: Paper presented at the The 15th International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications: Connecting to practice–teaching practice and the practice of applied mathematicians. Australian Catholic University (St. Patrick), Melbourne.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, N. H., & Ng, K. E. D. (Eds.). (2015). Mathematical modelling: From theory to practice (1st edn.). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  29. Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 197–230). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM, 38(2), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ng, K. E. D. (2010). Initial experiences of primary school teachers with mathematical modelling. In B. Kaur & J. Dindyal (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and applications: Yearbook of Association of Mathematics Educators (pp. 129–144). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ng, K. E. D. (2013a). Teacher readiness in mathematical modelling: Are there differences between pre-service and experienced teachers? In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. Brown (Eds.), Connecting to practice: Teaching practice and the practice of applied mathematicians (pp. 339–348). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Ng, K. E. D. (2013b). Initial perspectives of teacher professional development on mathematical modelling in Singapore: A framework for facilitation. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 427–436). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ng, K. E. D., Lee, N. H., Chan, C. M. E., Cheang, W. K., Cheng, L. P., Ho, F. H., & Zhao, D. S.(Eds.). (2012). Mathematical modelling: A collection of classroom tasks. Singapore: Alston Publishing House Private Limited.Google Scholar
  35. Ng, K. E. D., Widjaja, W., Chan, C. M. E., & Seto, C. (2015). Developing teaching competencies through videos for facilitation of mathematical modelling in Singapore primary schools. In S. F. Ng (Ed.), The contributions of video and audio technology towards professional development of mathematics teachers (pp. 15–38). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD]. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en.
  37. Stender, P., & Kaiser, G. (2015). Scaffolding in complex modelling situations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1255–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stillman, G. (2010a). Implementing applications and modelling in secondary school: Issues for teaching and learning. In B. Kaur & J. Dindyal (Eds.), Mathematical applications and modelling (pp. 300–322). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stillman, G. (2010b). Problem posing for mathematical modelling. In: Paper presented at the Mathematical modelling outreach, Singapore, River Valley High School.Google Scholar
  40. Stillman, G. (2011). Applying metacognitive knowledge and strategies in applications and modelling tasks at secondary school. In G. Kaiser, G. W. Blum, R. B. Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling 1: Trends in teachingand learning of mathematical modelling–ICTMA14 (pp. 165–180). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Galbraith, P. (2010). Identifying challenges within transition phases of mathematical modeling activities at year 9. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 385–398). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stillman, G., Brown, J., Galbraith, P. L., & Ng, K. E. D. (2016). Research into mathematical applications and modelling. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia: 2012–2015 (pp. 281–304). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tan, L. S., & Ang, K. C. (2013). Pre-service secondary school teachers’ knowledge in mathematical modelling—A case study. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 373–384). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tan, L. S., & Ang, K. C. (2015). A school-based professional development programme for teachers of mathematical modelling in Singapore. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9305-z.Google Scholar
  47. Thomas, K., & Hart, J. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of model eliciting activities. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. Haines & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 531–538). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wake, G. (2015). Preparing for workplace numeracy: A modelling perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 675–689.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0704-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations