Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 201–215 | Cite as

Mathematical modelling with hands-on experimental tasks: on the student’s sense of credibility

  • Susana Carreira
  • Ana Margarida Baioa
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Based on a teaching intervention with modelling activities involving experimental work in 9th grade classes, the goal of this study is to find out how students estimate the credibility a modelling task setting when it integrates a hands-on experimental approach. The theoretical background is based on the concept of authenticity and its long tradition in mathematical modelling and inquiry-based learning and advances a path of discussion around the concept of credibility. This is done in close connection to the relevance of experiments and hands-on activities in mathematical modelling in line with a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics approach. The students were assigned the task of creating custom colour paint, responding to an order from a customer in a paint manufacturing company. The empirical data were collected from the observation of two classes and a questionnaire after completion of the task. The results indicate that students viewed the event as credible, as well as the goal of the task. They also considered the experimental work to be necessary and found the mathematical model obtained to be feasible. Moreover the students showed awareness of a distinction between their experiments and models and those developed by professionals. In short, the students ascribed credibility to the task setting and were able to acknowledge an approximation to reality in both the prototype created and the model built.

Keywords

Authenticity Credibility Experimental mathematical modelling Hands-on tasks STEM approach 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alsina, C. (2002). Too much is not enough. Teaching mathematics through useful applications with local and global perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostel, L. (1960). Towards the formal study of models in the non-formal sciences. Synthese, 12(2), 125–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blomhøj, M. (2009). Different perspectives in research on the teaching and learning mathematical modelling—Categorising the TSG21 papers. In M. Blomhøj & S. Carreira (Eds.), Mathematical applications and modelling in teaching and learning of mathematics (proceedings from topic study group 21 at the 11th international congress on mathematical education, Monterrey, Mexico, July 6–13, 2008) (pp. 1–17). Roskilde, Denmark: IMFUFA.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 73–96). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bonotto, C., & Basso, M. (2001). Is it possible to change the classroom activities in which we delegate the process of connecting mathematics with reality? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(3), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borba, M., & Villarreal, M. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, visualization and experimentation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Brinkmann, A., & Brinkmann, K. (2007). Integration of energy issues in mathematics classrooms. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 304–313). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai, J., Cirillo, M., Pelesko, J., Ferri, R. B., Borba, M., Geiger, V., Stillman, G., English, L., Wake, G., Kaiser, G., & Kwon, O. (2014). Mathematical modelling in school education: Mathematical, cognitive, curricular, instructional, and teacher education perspectives. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allen (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (vol. 1, pp. 145–172). Vancouver, Canada: PME.Google Scholar
  9. Carreira, S., & Baioa, A. M. (2011). Students’ modelling routes in the context of object manipulation and experimentation in mathematics. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 211–220). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carreira, S., & Baioa, A. M. (2015). Assessing the best staircase: Students’ modelling based on experimentation with real objects. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth conference of the european society for research in mathematics education (pp. 834–840). Prague, Czech Republic: ERME.Google Scholar
  11. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–330). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  13. Donovan, S., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  14. English, L. (2013). Complex modelling in the primary and middle school years: An interdisciplinary approach. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 491–505). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.Google Scholar
  16. English, L., & Mousoulides, N. (2015). Bridging STEM in a real-world problem. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 20(9), 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. English, L., & Watters, J. J. (2009). Mathematical modelling in the early school years. In B. Sriraman, V. Freiman & N. Lirette-Pitre (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity, creativity, and learning (pp. 177–197). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Frejd, P. (2014). Modes of mathematical modelling: An analysis of how modelling is used and interpreted in and out of school settings. (Doctoral dissertation). Linköping University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  19. Galbraith, P. (2006). Real world problems: Developing principles of design. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnapan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces (pp. 229–236). Adelaide: MERGA.Google Scholar
  20. Galbraith, P. (2011). Models of modelling: Is there a first among equals? In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices (proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers) (pp. 279–287). Adelaide: AAMT and MERGA.Google Scholar
  21. Geiger, V. (2017). Designing for mathematical applications and modelling tasks in technology rich environments. In A. Leung & A. Baccaglini-Frank (Eds.), Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks—Potential and pitfalls (pp. 285–301). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greefrath, G., Siller, H.-S., & Weitendorf, J. (2011). Modelling considering the influence of technology. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 315–329). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). Modelling for life: Mathematics and children’s experience. In W. Blum, W. Henne & M. Niss (Eds.), Applications and modelling in mathematics education (ICMI study 14) (pp. 89–98). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halverscheid, S. (2008). Building a local conceptual framework for epistemic actions in a modelling environment with experiments. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heck, A. (2010). Modelling in cross-disciplinary authentic student research projects. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 17(3), 115–120.Google Scholar
  26. Jablonka, E. (2001). Modelling: Good problems—Not only a question of (good) taste. In J. F. Matos, W. Blum, S. Carreira & K. Houston (Eds.), Modelling, applications and mathematics education (pp. 305–316). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
  27. Jablonka, E. (2007). The relevance of modelling and applications: Relevant to whom and for what purpose? In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 193–200). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM, 38(3), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelly, A., Baek, J., Lesh, R., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). Enabling innovations in education and systematizing their impact. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh & J. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 3–18). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Kertil, M., & Gurel, C. (2016). Mathematical modelling: A bridge to STEM education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, H.-S., & Songer, B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lesh, R., & Sriraman, B. (2005). John Dewey revisited: Pragmatism and the models-modeling perspective on mathematical learning. In A. Beckmann, C. Michelsen, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st international symposium of mathematics and its connections to the arts and sciences (pp. 7–31). Schwöbisch Gmund, Germany: The University of Education.Google Scholar
  35. Mousoulides, N., Chrysostomou, M., Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2010). Modelling with technology in elementary classrooms. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth congress of the european society for research in mathematics education (pp. 2226–2235). Lyon: INRP.Google Scholar
  36. Niss, M. (1992). Applications and modelling in school mathematics: Directions for future development. Roskilde: IMFUFA.Google Scholar
  37. Palm, T. (2008). Impact of authenticity on sense making in word problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palm, T. (2009). Theory of authentic task situations. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 3–19). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Pang, J., & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: Implications for further research. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pegito, J., Blanco, M., & Ares, J. (2013). Un ejemplo de modelización matemática en la enseñanza secundaria: Aceite y agua. Revista Binacional Brasil Argentina (RBBA), 2(2), 61–87.Google Scholar
  41. Prins, G., & Pilot, A. (2013). Adapting authentic science practices into contexts for learning: The case of models and modelling in pre-university chemistry education. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research—Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 619–640). Enschede: SLO.Google Scholar
  42. Turner, R. (2016). Lessons from PISA 2012 about mathematical literacy: An illustrated essay. PNA, 10(2), 77–94.Google Scholar
  43. Vallverdú, J. (2014). What are simulations? An epistemological approach. Procedia Technology, 13, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  45. Villarreal, M. E., Esteley, C. B., & Mina, M. V. (2010). Modeling empowered by information and communication technologies. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vos, P. (2006). Assessment of mathematics in a laboratory-like environment: The importance of replications. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth congress of the european society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1696–1705). Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain: ERME.Google Scholar
  47. Vos, P. (2011). What is ‘authentic’ in the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling? In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 713–722). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vos, P. (2015). Authenticity in extra-curricular mathematics activities: Researching authenticity as a social construct. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice: International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 105–113). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Ciências e TecnologiaUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.UIDEF, Instituto de EducaçãoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Agrupamento de Escolas D. Manuel ITaviraPortugal

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options