Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 301–314 | Cite as

Training mathematics teachers for realistic math problems: a case of modeling-based teacher education courses

  • Serife Sevinc
  • Richard Lesh
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

One important goal of teacher education has been to improve pre-service teachers’ understanding of the connection between real-life events and mathematics. Toward this goal, we designed two mathematics teacher education courses based on the Models-and-Modeling Perspective. This study presents a three-tier modeling investigation of (a) pre-service teachers’ views about characteristics of realistic mathematics problems, and (b) teacher-level skills required to write such problems. A team of researchers analyzed 15 pre-service mathematics teachers’ written artifacts and audio recordings of their discussion by employing the data analysis methods of constructivist grounded theory. In these two modeling-based courses, pre-service teachers completed several modeling cycles, during which they exhibited significant changes in their understandings about the characteristics of realistic problems and the skills that are needed to write–revise–refine such problems. The results thus indicated that modeling-based courses helped pre-service teachers think critically about stereotypical textbook problems, view realistic contexts as a medium through which mathematical ideas could be reasoned, understand the mathematical residuals of lessons involving realistic problems, and attain the skills needed to write and revise such problems. Hence, the modeling perspective provided an effective approach for pre-service mathematics teacher training, ensuring pre-service teachers’ development as they express–test–revise–refine their thinking, understandings, and skills.

Keywords

Pre-service teacher education Realistic mathematics problems Models-and-modeling perspective Mathematics teacher education courses 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Supplementary material

11858_2017_898_MOESM1_ESM.docx (71 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 72 KB)

References

  1. Bonotto, C. (2007). How to replace word problems with activities of realistic mathematical modelling. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, M. Niss & H.-W. Henn (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI study (New ICMI; Studies Series) (Vol. 10) (pp. 185–192). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. ZDM, 38(2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, K. K., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modeling approach to describe teacher knowledge. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: A models and modelling perspective on mathematics problem solving; learning and teaching (pp. 159–173). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. de Lange, J. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (part 1, pp. 49–97). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dienes, Z. (1960). Building up mathematics (4th edn.). London: Hutchinson Educational.Google Scholar
  9. Dienes, Z. (1967). The power of mathematics. London: Hutchinson Educational.Google Scholar
  10. Doerr, H. M. (2006). Teachers’ ways of listening and responding to students’ emerging mathematical models. ZDM, 38(3), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. English, L. D. (2006). Mathematical modeling in the primary school: Children’s construction of a consumer guide. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. English, L. D. (2009). Promoting interdisciplinarity through mathematical modelling. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. English, L. D., & Mousoulides, N. G. (2015). Bridging STEM in a real-world problem. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 20(9), 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject-matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gravemeijer, K. (2007). Emergent modelling as a precursor to mathematical modelling. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (new ICMI study series, Vol. 10) (pp. 137–144). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). Modelling for life: Mathematics and children’s experience. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 89–98). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, E., Lesh, R., Lester, F., & Brilleslyper, M. (2008). Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) as a bridge between engineering education research and mathematics education research. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(2), 1–25.Google Scholar
  19. Hjalmarson, M., & Lesh, R. (2008). Engineering and design research: Intersections for education research and design. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh & K. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 96–110). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modeling in mathematics education. ZDM, 38(3), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesh, R. (2006). New directions for research on mathematical problem solving. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces. Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia, Canberra (Vol. 1, pp. 15–34). Adelaide: MERGA.Google Scholar
  22. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving learning, and teaching (pp. 3–34). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Lesh, R., English, L., Riggs, C., & Sevis, S. (January, 2013). Problem solving in the primary school (K-2). [Special issue]. The mathematics enthusiast, special issue: International perspectives on problem solving research in mathematics education, 10 (1, 2), 35–60.Google Scholar
  24. Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 157–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 113–149). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665–708). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and modeling perspectives on the development of students and teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lesh, R., Sriraman, B., & English, L. (2014). Theories of learning mathematics. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 615–623). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Lesh, R., & Yoon, C. (2004). Evolving communities of mind-in which development involves several interacting and simultaneously developing strands. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis, C. C. (2000). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Invited presentation to the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  31. MAXQDA, software for qualitative data analysis (1989–2015) VERBI software—consult. Sozialforschung GmbH, Berlin.Google Scholar
  32. Mousoulides, N. G. (2013). Facilitating parental engagement in school mathematics and science through inquiry-based learning: An examination of teachers’ and parents’ beliefs. ZDM, 45(6), 863–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Näveri, L., Pehkonen, E., Hannula, M. S., Laine, A., & Heinilä, L. (2011). Finnish elementary teachers’ espoused beliefs on mathematical problem solving. In Current state of research on mathematical beliefs XVII. Proceedings of the MAVI-17 conference (pp. 161–171).Google Scholar
  34. Peled, I., & Balacheff, N. (2011). Beyond realistic considerations: Modeling conceptions and controls in task examples with simple word problems. ZDM, 43(2), 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schorr, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modeling approach for providing teacher development. In R. A. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving; learning; and teaching (pp. 141–158). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Sevis, S. (2016). Unpacking teacher knowledge for bridging in- and out-of-school mathematics using mathematically-rich and contextually-realistic problems. ProQuest Digital Dissertations (UMI No: 10143631).Google Scholar
  37. Sriraman, B., & Lesh, R. (2006). Modeling conceptions revisited. ZDM, 38(3), 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. TIMSS Video Study. (1999). Japan public release lesson 2 lesson graph [8th grade]. http://www.timssvideo.com/sites/default/files/JP2%20Lesson%20Graph_0.pdf.
  39. University Catalog (2005). General catalog 2005–2007. Ankara: METU Printing Studio Press.Google Scholar
  40. Verschaffel, L., de Corte, E., & Borghart, I. (1997). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions and beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in mathematical modelling of school word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (1999). Pupils’ beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in mathematical modelling of school arithmetic word problems. In E. Pehkonen & G. Tomer (Eds.), Oberwolfach meeting on belief research (pp. 138–168).Google Scholar
  42. Wubbels, T., Korthagen, F., & Broekman, H. (1997). Preparing teachers for realistic mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Science Education, School of EducationMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options