Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 49, Issue 7, pp 987–993 | Cite as

Lesson unplanning: toward transforming routine tasks into non-routine problems

  • Ronald A. Beghetto
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

How might teachers transform routine tasks into non-routine ones? The purpose of this article is to address this question. The article opens with a discussion of why non-routine problems require creative and original thought. Specifically, I discuss how non-routine problems require students to confront uncertainty and how uncertainty can serve as a catalyst for creative thought and action. Next, I discuss how the logic of routine tasks can impede original and creative thought. I then introduce the concept of lesson unplanning and explain how it can be used to convert routine tasks into non-routine problems. I also discuss how non-routine problems can range from more modest in-classroom assignments to more ambitious efforts. The paper closes with a brief discussion of directions for future research and practice.

Keywords

Creative thinking Originality Uncertainty Teaching Learning Problem solving Non-routine problems Routine problems 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. R. (1987). Creativity and the philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Aoki, T. T. (2004). Spinning inspirited images. In W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 413–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Baer, J. (2016). Content matters: Why nurturing creativity is so different in different domains. In R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creative Contradictions in Education (pp. 3–20). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 373–397.Google Scholar
  6. Bass, H. (2005). Mathematics, mathematicians, and mathematics education. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 42, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Beghetto, R. A. (2016a). Big wins, small steps: Leading for and with creativity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beghetto, R. A. (2016b). Leveraging micro-opportunities to address macroproblems: Toward an unshakeable sense of possibility thinking. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Creative intelligence in the 21st Century: Grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  10. Beghetto, R. A. (2016c). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beghetto, R. A. (2016d). Creativity and conformity. In J. A. Plucker (Ed.), Creativity and innovation: Current understandings and debates. Waco, TX: Prufrock.Google Scholar
  12. Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Legacy projects: Helping young people respond productively to the challenges of a changing world. Roeper Review, 39, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beghetto, R. A. (in press-a). Inviting uncertainty into the classroom. Educational Leadership.Google Scholar
  14. Beghetto, R. A. (in press-b). What if? Unleashing the power of complex challenges. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Google Scholar
  15. Beghetto, R. A. (accepted). Abductive reasoning and the genesis of new ideas: Charles S. Peirce. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The creativity reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Beghetto, R. A., & Schreiber, J. B. (2016). Creativity in doubt: Toward understanding what drives creativity in learning. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond. Netherlands: Springer Science and Business.Google Scholar
  17. Berliner, D. C. (2011). Narrowing curriculum, assessments, and conceptions of what it means to be smart in the U.S. schools: Creaticide by design. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 79–93). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Burks, A. W. (1946). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science, 13, 301–306.Google Scholar
  19. Duckworth, E. (1996). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning (2nd edn.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Getzels, J. W. (1964). Creative thinking, problem solving, and instruction. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction (pp. 240–267). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (HSCA). (Producer). (2000). Private universe project in mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.learner.org/ resources/series120.html.
  23. Kamii, C. (2000). Double-column addition: A teacher uses Piaget’s theory [VHS Tape]. New York, NY: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, H. S., & Anderson, J. R. (2013). Student learning: What has instruction got to do with it? Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring collective mathematical creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 3, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mackworth, N. H. (1965). Orginality. American Psychologist, 20, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Mumford, M., & McIntosh, T. (in press). Creative thinking processes: The past and the future. Journal of Creative Behavior.Google Scholar
  29. Niu, W., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Creativity in mathematics teaching: A Chinese perspective (an update). In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.Google Scholar
  32. Pólya, G. (1966). On teaching problem solving. In Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, The role of axiomatics and problem solving in mathematics (pp. 123–129). Boston, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
  33. Pretz, J. E., Naples, A. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 3–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robertson, S. I. (2017). Problem solving (2nd Ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). The wild, wild, wild, wild, wild world of problem solving (a review of sorts). For the Learning of Mathematics, 3, 40–47.Google Scholar
  38. Simonton, D. K. (2016). Big-c versus little-c creativity: Definitions, implications, and inherent educational contradictions. In R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education (pp. 3–20). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Siraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2010). Educational creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 250–264). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39, 152–169.Google Scholar
  42. Wiggins, B., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options