Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 571–584 | Cite as

Learning from worked-examples in mathematics: students relate procedures to principles

  • Alexander Renkl
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article discusses the relevance of the worked-example effect for mathematics education. This effect refers to the finding that, in initial cognitive skill acquisition, students profit more from studying worked examples as compared to solving problems. One reason for the effectiveness of worked examples is that the students get the opportunity to interrelate principles (e.g., mathematical theorems) with multiple problem cases. A knowledge structure in which principles and multiple problem cases are represented in an interconnected way is a very good pre-condition for transfer. Several potential objections against worked examples from a mathematics education perspective are discussed (e.g., worked examples do not address typical student errors) by referring primarily to our own studies. We also propose further research exploring whether the powerful method of learning from worked-examples can be adapted to and used in other, presently intensively discussed areas of mathematics education (e.g., fostering skills of mathematical modelling). Finally, recommendations for mathematics education are outlined.

Keywords

Worked examples Self-explanation Cognitive skill acquisition Transfer Mathematics education 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aleven, V., McLaughlin, Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2017). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed, pp. 460–482.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Combining fading with prompting fosters learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berthold, K., Röder, H., Knörzer, D., Kessler, W., & Renkl, A. (2011). The double-edged effects of explanation prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokosmaty, S., Sweller, J., & Kalyuga, S. (2015). Learning geometry problem solving by studying worked examples: Effects of learner guidance and expertise. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning & Instruction, 25, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booth, J. L., Oyer, M. H., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Elliot, A. J., Barbieri, C., Augustine, A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2015). Learning algebra by example in real-world classrooms. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8, 530–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, W. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi, M. T., Bassok, H., Lewis, M., Reimann, M. W., P., &amp, Glaser, R (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chi, M. T., & VanLehn, K. A. (2012). Seeing deep structure from the interactions of surface features. Educational Psychologist, 47, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2012). The import of knowledge export: Connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derry, S. J., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2014). Multimedia learning with video. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd edn., pp. 785–812). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Didierjean, A., & Cauzinille-Marmèche, E. (1998). Reasoning by analogy: Is it schema-mediated or case-based? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning & Instruction, 22, 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Große, C. S. (2015). Fostering modeling competencies: Benefits of worked examples, problems to be solved, and fading procedures. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 364–375.Google Scholar
  19. Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Learning & Instruction, 17, 612–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hefter, M. H., Berthold, K., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., & Fries, S. (2014). Effects of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while processing conflicting scientific positions. Instructional Science, 42, 929–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hefter, M. H., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., Fries, S., & Berthold, K. (2015). Effects of a training intervention to foster precursors of evaluativist epistemological understanding and intellectual values. Learning & Instruction, 39, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hilbert, T. S., Renkl, A., Kessler, S., & Reiss, K. (2008). Learning to prove in geometry: Learning from heuristic examples and how it can be supported. Learning & Instruction, 18, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–78). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd edn., pp. 43–71). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014b). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. McLaren, B. M., van Gog, T., Ganoe, C., Karabinos, M., & Yaron, D. (2016). The efficiency of worked examples compared to erroneous examples, tutored problem solving, and problem solving in computer-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nievelstein, F., van Gog, T., van Dijck, G., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2013). The worked example and expertise reversal effect in less structured tasks: Learning to reason about legal cases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nokes-Malach, T. J., VanLehn, K., Belenky, D., Lichtenstein, M., & Cox, G. (2013). Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation. European Journal of Education of Psychology, 28, 1237–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perez-Felkner, L., McDonald, S. K., Schneider, B., & Grogan, E. (2012). Female and male adolescents’ subjective orientations to mathematics and the influence of those orientations on postsecondary majors. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reed, S. K., Corbett, A., Hoffman, B., Wagner, A., & MacLaren, B. (2013). Effect of worked examples and Cognitive Tutor training on constructing equations. Instructional Science, 41, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reiss, K., Heinze, A., Renkl, A., & Groß, C. (2008). Reasoning and proof in geometry: Effects of a learning environment based on heuristic worked-out examples. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reiss, K., & Renkl, A. (2002). Learning to prove: The idea of heuristic examples. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 34, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Renkl, A. (2012). How to avoid inert knowledge—or different roads lead to Rome: The case of principle-based transfer. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver. (April 2012).Google Scholar
  39. Renkl, A. (2014a). Theoretische Konzepte und Prinzipien auf den Schulalltag beziehen: Ein wenig Theorie and darauf begründete Vorschläge für die Referendariatsausbildung [Relating theoretical concepts and principles to classroom practice: A bit of theory and delineated recommendations for teacher education]. Seminar, 2/2014, 9–16.Google Scholar
  40. Renkl, A. (2014b). Towards an instructionally-oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Renkl, A. (2015a). Different roads lead to Rome: The case of principle-based cognitive skills. Learning: Research & Practice, 1, 79–90.Google Scholar
  42. Renkl, A. (2015b). Drei Dogmen guten Lehrens: Warum sie falsch sind [Three dogmas about learning and instruction: Why they are wrong]. Psychologische Rundschau, 66, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Renkl, A. (2017). Instruction based on examples. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd edn., pp. 325–348). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skills acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Renkl, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Studying visual displays: How to instructionally support learning. Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9340-4.Google Scholar
  47. Renkl, A., Solymosi, J., Erdmann, M., & Aleven, V. (2013). Training principle-based self-explanations: Transfer to new learning contents. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1205–1210). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  48. Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: The effects of direct instruction and self-explanation. Child Development, 77, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rittle-Johnson, B., Loehr, A. M., & Durkin, K. (2017). Promoting self-explanation to improve mathematics learning: A meta-analysis and instructional design principles. ZDM Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1007/s11858-017-0834-z.
  51. Ross, B. H. (1989). Remindings in learning and instruction. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 438–469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rourke, A. J., & Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognise designers’ styles. Learning & Instruction, 19, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rummel, N., Spada, H., & Hauser, S. (2009). Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salden, R., Aleven, V., Renkl, A., & Schwonke, R. (2009). Worked examples and tutored problem solving: Redundant or synergistic forms of support? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salden, R., Koedinger, K. R., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Accounting for beneficial effects of worked examples in tutored problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, K., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (2009). The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers & Education, 46, 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 34, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Siegler, R. S., & Chen, Z. (2008). Differentiation and integration: Guiding principles for analyzing cognitive change. Developmental Science, 11, 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stark, R., Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (2002). Conditions and effects of example elaboration. Learning & Instruction, 12, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., Blum, W., & Brown, J. P. (Eds.), (2013). Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice. New York: Springer Science & Business Media Google Scholar
  64. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition & Instruction, 2, 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tropper, N., Leiss, D., & Hänze, M. (2015). Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 1225–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding about rational numbers and their notation. Cognition & Instruction, 28, 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2008). Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning & Instruction, 18, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Loon-Hillen, N., van Gog, T., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2010). Effects of worked examples in a primary school mathematics curriculum. Interactive Learning Environments, 18, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). How effective are instructional explanations in example-based learning? A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhu, X., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition & Instruction, 4, 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zöttl, L., Ufer, S., & Reiss, K. (2010). Modelling with heuristic worked examples in the KOMMA learning environment. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options