Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 461–473 | Cite as

Good teaching feels good—but what is “good teaching”? Exploring teachers’ definitions of teaching success in mathematics

  • Barbara JacobEmail author
  • Anne C. Frenzel
  • Elizabeth J. Stephens
Original Article

Abstract

Teacher emotions are of growing interest in educational research, but empirical findings are still scarce. In their recent model illustrating the possible causes and effects of teacher emotions, Frenzel and colleagues argue that emotions are driven by subjective appraisals of success and failure. Specifically, these authors propose that teachers judge their teaching success based on specific dimensions of student behaviors (output orientation). Moreover, there are multiple models on instructional quality detailing which teacher behaviors characterize successful teaching (input orientation). To date, however, it is unknown how and when teachers themselves appraise their teaching as successful. To gain insight into teachers’ appraisals of success, 307 mathematics teachers responded to an open-ended question about their criteria for math teaching success. Results showed that teachers’ responses could be organized into six categories that mapped partly onto Frenzel’s output-oriented model and partly onto the input-oriented instructional quality literature: (1) students’ mathematical skills, (2) students’ engagement, (3) students’ social skills, (4) cognitive activation and structured presentation of the learning content, (5) structured organization of the learning environment and (6) feedback. These findings highlight student behavior, teacher behavior and feedback as key sources for mathematics teachers’ subjective definitions of successful teaching and ultimately their emotional lives in the mathematics classroom.

Keywords

Teachers’ success criteria Reciprocal model Appraisals Teacher emotions Instructional quality 

References

  1. Anderman, L., & Klassen, R. (2015). Being a teacher: Efficacy, emotions, and interpersonal relationships in classroom settings. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (3rd edn., pp. 402–414). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63–83). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bavarian ministry for education (2015). School and education in Bavaria 2015—a statistical overview. https://www.km.bayern.de/statistik. Accessed 25 Sep 2016.
  5. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi: 10.3102/0002831209345157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S.; & Neubrand, M. (2011). Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Unterricht und die mathematische Kompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern. COACTIV – Ein Forschungsprogramm. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss & W. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften (pp. 7–25). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, E. S., Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Taxer, J. L. (2015). Antecedents of teachers’ emotions in the classroom: An intraindividual approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00635. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107(5), 1060–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bischof, L. M., Hochweber, J., Hartig, J., & Klieme, E. (2013). Schulentwicklung im Verlauf eines Jahrzehnts—Erste Ergebnisse des PISA-Schulpanels. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft, 59, 172–199.Google Scholar
  10. Bos, W., Wendt, H., Köller, O., & Selter, C. (Eds.). (2012). TIMSS 2011–Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  11. Brophy, J. (2000). Teaching. Brussels: International Academy of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org. Accessed 23 Nov 2012.
  12. Buff, A., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Pauli, C. (2011). Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom: “Nice to have” or something more? Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 452–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler, R. (2007). Teachers’ achievement goal orientations and associations with teachers’ help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, M.-L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Depaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Kelchtermans, G., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Martino, P., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., Liljedahl, P., Morselli, F., Pantziara, M., & Schukajlow, S. (2015, February). Introduction to the papers of TWG08: Affect and mathematical thinking. In Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education (CERME9) (pp. 1104–1107).Google Scholar
  18. Frenzel, A. C. (2014). Teacher emotions. In R. Pekrun & E. A. Linnenbrink (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 494–519). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2015). Teaching this class drives me nuts!—examining the person and context specificity of teacher emotions. PLoS One, 10(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129630. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.
  20. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Stephens, E. J., & Jacob, B. (2009). Antecedents and effects of teachers’ emotional experiences: An integrated perspective and empirical test. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 129–151). Boston: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Durksen, T. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Measuring teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The Teacher Emotions Scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148–163. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gates, B. (2013). Teachers need real feedback. Contribution on TED channel. https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_teachers_need_real_feedback/transcript. Accessed 10 May 2016.
  23. Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Bieg, M., Keller, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., & Hall, N. C. (2015). The glass half empty: How emotional exhaustion affects the state-trait discrepancy in self-reports of teaching emotions. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0137441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19(1), 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagenauer, G., Hascher, T., & Volet, S. E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: Associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(4), 385–403. doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0250-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811–826. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hargreaves, A. (Ed.). (2005). Extending educational change. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  28. Hascher, T. (2005). Emotionen im Schulalltag, Wirkungen und Regulationsformen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 51(5), 610–625.Google Scholar
  29. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800 + meta-analyses on achievement. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Helmke, A. (2003). Unterrichtsqualität erfassen, bewerten, verbessern. Seelze: Kallmeyer.Google Scholar
  31. Hogarty, K. Y., Lang, T. R., & Kromrey, J. D. (2003). Another look at technology use in classrooms: the development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ perceptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jerusalem, M., & Pekrun, R. (1999). Emotion, Motivation und Leistung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  33. Jung, E. (Ed.), (2005). Standards für die politische Bildung: Zwischen Weltwissen, Teilhabekompetenz und Lebenshilfe. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Kaiser, G., & Vollstedt, M. (2007). Teachers’ views on effective mathematics teaching: Commentaries from a European perspective. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 39(4), 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150–165. doi: 10.1037/a0026253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 90–106. doi: 10.1177/0022487112460398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom, (pp. 137–160). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  38. Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S. (2001). Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: “Aufgabenkultur” und Unterrichtsgestaltung. In TIMSS-Impulse für Schule und Unterricht (pp. 43–57). Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
  39. Kunter, M. (2005). Multiple Ziele im Mathematikunterricht. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  40. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2011). Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften–Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  41. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mann, H., & Whitney, D. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177730491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 601–613). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. M. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 334–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mertler, C. A. (2003). Patterns of response and nonresponse from teachers to traditional and web surveys. Practical Assessement, Research & Evaluation, 8(22). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=22. Accessed 21 April 2016.
  48. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Reconceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 377390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65–88.Google Scholar
  50. Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pekrun, R. (2000). A social cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  53. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Posner, K. L., Sampson, P. D., Caplan, R. A., Ward, R. J., & Cheney, F. W. (1990). Measuring interrater reliability among multiple raters: An example of methods for nominal data. Statistics in Medicine, 9, 1103–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rakoczy, K. (2008). Motivationsunterstützung im Mathematikunterricht–Unterricht aus der Perspektive von Lernenden und Beobachtern. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  58. Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2007). Structure as a quality feature in mathematics instruction. Cognitive and motivational effects of a structured organisation of the learning environment vs. a structured presentation of learning content. In M. Prenzel (Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools, The final report on the DFG Priority Programme (pp. 101–120). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  59. Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Schaarschmidt, U., & Kieschke, U. (Eds.). (2007). Gut gerüstet für den Schulalltag. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  61. Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.). (2007). Emotions in education. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  63. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: Role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358. doi: 10.1023/A:1026131715856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taubman, P. M. (2010). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2015). Facets of teachers’ emotional lives: A quantitative investigation of teachers’ genuine, faked, and hidden emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42, 78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. vom Hofe, R., Pekrun, R., Kleine, M., & Götz, T. (2002). Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA). Konstruktion des Regensburger Mathematikleistungstests für 5.-10. Klassen. In M. Prenzel & J. Doll (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Schulische und außerschulische Bedingungen mathematischer, naturwissenschaftlicher und überfachlicher Kompetenzen. Beiheft (Vol. 45, pp. 83–100). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Educational ScienceFriedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-NurembergNurembergGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations