Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 291–303 | Cite as

Research on teaching practice in a Portuguese initial secondary mathematics teacher education program

  • João Pedro da Ponte
  • Leonor Santos
  • Hélia Oliveira
  • Ana Henriques
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

In teacher education, a key issue is how prospective teachers learn. At the University of Lisbon, based on an inquiry-based approach to mathematics learning, we developed a secondary school mathematics teacher education program, in which a central feature is the elaboration of a final investigative report based on teaching practice. In this paper, our aim is to understand the professional learning opportunities and difficulties recognized by prospective teachers (PT) in their final reports, by addressing the following research questions: (1) What didactical choices do PT mention regarding the approach to teaching, the use of tasks, resources and assessment strategies in their teaching practices? (2) What transversal elements of teaching practices do they recognize as enabling their professional development? and (3) What elements of the investigative work do PT refer to as major professional learning outcomes? Using content analysis, we reviewed, coded, and analyzed all 38 reports produced so far in the program. The results suggest that the PT embraced an inquiry-based approach to learning, valuing the role of suitable tasks and of whole class discussions. They also valued reflection and collaboration as practices that support professional development. Prospective teachers also indicated some difficulties and challenges in doing this investigation based on their teaching practice, but even so they tended to regard it a learning opportunity. We conclude that the final report, by its content, structure, and working processes as framed in this teaching education program, supports participants’ development as teachers who hold research in positive regard.

Keywords

Prospective teacher education Secondary Mathematics Teaching practice Investigative work 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45, 797–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardin, L. (2003). L’Analyse de contenu (10th edn.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  3. Beillerot, J. (2001). A “pesquisa”: Esboço de uma análise. In M. André (Ed.), O papel da pesquisa na formação e na prática dos professores (pp. 71–90). Campinas: Papirus.Google Scholar
  4. Bergsten, C., Grevholm, B., Favilli, F., Bednarz, N., Proulx, J., Mewborn, D., Johnson, P., Rowland, T., Thwaites, A., Huckstep, P., DeBlois, L., Maheux, J.-F., Chapman, O., Rosu, L. M., Arvold, B., Gellert, U., Krummheuer, G., Skott, J., Garegae, K. G., Chakalisa, P. A., Kadijevich, D., Haapasalo, L., Hvorecky, J., Carneiro Abrahão, A., de Carvalho Correa de Oliveira, A. T., Novotná, J., Hofmannová, M., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2009). Learning to teach mathematics: Expanding the role of practicum as an integrated part of a teacher education programme. In R. Even & D. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI Study (pp. 57–70). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Studying teacher preparation: The questions that drive research. European Educational Research Journal, 14(5), 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawford, K., & Adler, J. (1996). Teachers as researchers in mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1187–1205). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI Study. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Kitchen, J., & Stevens, D. (2007). Action research in teacher education: Preparing pre-service teachers to be adaptive experts. Teaching & Learning, 4(2), 15–20.Google Scholar
  10. Kizilaslan, I., & Leutwyler, B. (2012). Pre-service teacher action research: Concept, international trends and implications for teacher education in Turkey. In N. Popov et al. (Eds.), International perspectives on education (pp. 155–162). Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.Google Scholar
  11. Krainer, K. (2002). Investigation into practice as a powerful means of promoting (student) teachers’ professional growth. In J. Novotná (Ed.), CERME 2: European research in mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 281–291). Prague: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogická Faculta.Google Scholar
  12. Lin, F.-L., & Rowland, T. (2016). Pre-service and in-service mathematics teachers´ knowledge and professional development. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook in the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 483–520). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maaβ, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: A synthesis. ZDM, 45(6), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. NCTM (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  15. Nicol, C., & Crespo, S. (2003). Learning in and from practice: Teachers investigate their mathematics teaching. Proceedings of PME, 27(3), 373–380.Google Scholar
  16. Peter-Koop, A. (2001). From “teacher researchers” to “student teacher researchers”: Diagnostically enriched didactics. Proceedings of PME, 25(1), 72–79.Google Scholar
  17. Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2016). Prospective mathematics teachers’ learning and knowledge for teaching. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd edn., pp. 275–296). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Ponte, J. P., Quaresma, M., Mata-Pereira, J., & Baptista, M. (2015). Exercícios, problemas e explorações: Perspetivas de professoras num estudo de aula. Quadrante, 24(2), 11–134.Google Scholar
  19. Ponte, J.P. (2008). Researching our own practice. In B. Czarnocha (Ed.), Handbook of mathematics teaching research (pp. 19–35). Rzeszów: University of Rzeszów.Google Scholar
  20. Stehlíková, N., & Jirotková, D. (2003). Process oriented research in pre-service mathematics teachers education: A case of diploma theses. In C. Bergsten & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Challenges in mathematics education (Proceedings of MADIF 3) (pp. 165–174). Linköping: Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  21. Tatto, M. T., Lerman, S., & Novotna, J. (2010). The organization of the mathematics preparation and development of teachers: A report from the ICMI Study 15. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(4), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Towers, J. (2010). Learning to teach mathematics through inquiry: A focus on the relationship between describing and enacting inquiry-oriented teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(3), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2007). Taken-as-shared: A review of common assumptions about mathematical tasks in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4), 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de EducaçãoUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options