Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 203–221 | Cite as

Effects of using problem of the week in teaching on teacher learning and change in algebraic thinking and algebra

  • Zhonghe Wu
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

The study investigated the effects of using the problem of the week in teaching (POWT) on teachers’ learning and changes in knowledge and teaching skills, in algebraic thinking and algebra tasks, in the setting of a university mathematics education graduate program. The graduate students participated in learning POWT weekly in a mathematics education course, which tasked the students to solve a problem, address the concept of the problem, discuss teaching the concept of the problem with conceptual understanding, and explain their reasoning. Data collection included weekly collection of student work on POWT. The one-way within subject analysis of variance was used to analyze the teachers’ growth and change in their knowledge and teaching skills in algebraic thinking and in algebra, reflected in their performance on the POWTs. The differences in the knowledge, and skills changes, were compared within each POWT and across all POWTs. The results show that the teachers enhanced their knowledge and teaching skills in problem solving, conceptual understanding and teaching methods as a result of doing the POWTs.

Keywords

Algebra Conceptual understanding Problem solving Teaching method Teacher knowledge and skills Content pedagogical knowledge 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school mathematics teachers in China and the U.S. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An, S., & Wu, Z. (2014). Using the evidence-based MSA approach to enhance teacher knowledge in student mathematics learning and assessment. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 108–129.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Education, 14–22, 43–46.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Theoretical framework, study design and main results of TEDS-M. In S. Blömeke et al. (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn, advances in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Springer Science Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In R. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–725). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Boston, M. D. (2013). Connecting changes in secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge to their experiences in a professional development workshop. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. California Department of Education (2005). Mathematics framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: Author.Google Scholar
  10. California Department of Education (2014). The California common core state standards: Mathematics. Sacramento, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  11. California Department of Education (2015a). Mathematics framework for California public schools. Sacramento: California Department of Education.Google Scholar
  12. California Department of Education (2015b). State schools chief Torlakson calls frst year of CAASPPresults: California’s starting point toward goal of career and college readiness. Retrived from http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/ne/yr15/yr15rel69.asp.
  13. Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1991). Research and cognitively guided instruction. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 1–17). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  14. Charles, C. M., & Senter, G. W. (2012). Elementary classroom management (6th edn.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, W. (2006). A study of teacher’s knowledge structure from the perspective of teacher’s professional development (Unpublished Masters thesis). Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Cuoco, A. A. (2001). Preface. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The role of representation in school mathematics (pp. ix–xiii). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  18. Dickey, E. M. (1997). Challenges of mathematics teaching today: How can school leaders help? NASSP Bulletin, 1–10.Google Scholar
  19. Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Findell, B. (2010). The mathematical education of prospective teachers of secondary school mathematics: Old assumptions, new challenges. Mathematics and the Mathematical Sciences, 31–41.  Google Scholar
  20. Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 275–285). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  21. Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. (2014). Using representations of practice to elicit teachers’ tacit knowledge of practice: A comparison of responses to animations and videos. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(6), 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 1–15.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachersÕ topic specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.   Google Scholar
  25. Kaput, J., Carraher, D., & Blanton, M. (2007). Algebra in the early grades. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Kenney, P. A., & Silver, E. A. (1997). Results from the sixth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  27. Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Jungjohann, K., Chard. D. J., & Baker, S. (2007). From arithmetic to algebra. Educational Leadership, 65(3), 66–71.Google Scholar
  28. Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Kieran, C. (2007a). What do we know about the teaching and learning of algebra in the elementary grades? NCTM Brief. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/news/content.aspx?id=12326.
  30. Kieran, C. (2007b). What do students struggle with when first introduced to algebra symbols? NCTM Brief, Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/news/content.aspx?id=12332.
  31. Kieran, C. (2007c).  Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. In K. L. Frank (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 707–762). Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age; Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  32. Kober, N., & Rentner, D. S. (2011). Common core state standards: Progress and challenges in school districts’ implementation. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED523957.
  33. Kober, N., & Rentner, D. S. (2012). Year two of implementing the common core state standards: States’ progress and challenges. Washington: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED528907.
  34. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and learning elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Merriam-Webster: Dictionary and Thesaurus. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/knowledge; https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/skill.
  37. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2016). What teachers should know and be able to do. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/sites/default/files/what_teachers_should_know.pdf.
  38. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014a). Algebra as a strand of school mathematics for all students. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014b). Principles to actions. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  41. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.Google Scholar
  42. National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  43. National Research Council (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics learning study committee, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinsky, N. (2013). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and visualizing differential geometry. HMC Senior Theses. 49.Google Scholar
  46. Porter A., McMaken J., Hwang J., & Yang R. (2011). Common core standards: The new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40, 103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schifter, D., Russell, S. J., & Bastable, V.  (2009). Early algebra to reach the range of learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16, 230–237.Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt, W. H., Blömeke, S., & Tatto, M. T. (2011). Teacher education matters: A study of middle school mathematics teacher preparation in six countries. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  49. Star, J. R., Caronongan, P., Foegen, A., Furgeson, J., Keating, B., Larson, M. R., Lyskawa, J., McCallum, W. G., Porath, J., & Zbiek, R. M. (2015). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students (NCEE 2014–4333). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Retrieved from the NCEE website: http://whatworks.ed.gov.
  50. Stigler, J., W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teacher for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte (pp. 157-223), NC: Information Age Pub.Google Scholar
  52. Thompson, P. W., & Lambdin, D. (1994). Research into practice: Concrete materials and teaching for mathematical understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 41, 556–558.Google Scholar
  53. U.S. Department of Education’s Institute for Education Sciences. (2015).  Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students Practice Guide Summary. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/practiceguide/wwc_algebra_summary_072115.pdf.
  54. Van De Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  55. Webb, D. C., Boswinkel, N., & Dekker, T. (2008). Using representations to support student understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(2), 110–113.Google Scholar
  56. Welder, R. M. & Simonsen, L. M. (2011). Elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching prerequisite algebra concepts. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1: Content Knowledge, 1-16.Google Scholar
  57. Wu, Z. (2006). Learning mathematics with understand: Discussion of mathematics proficiency. Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), 41–45.Google Scholar
  58. Wu, Z. (2008). Using the MSA model to assess Chinese sixth graders’ mathematics proficiency. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 70–90.Google Scholar
  59. Wu, Z., & An (2016). Addressing challenges in urban teaching and learning mathematics using model- strategy-application with reasoning approach in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms. Journal of Urban Learning Teaching and Research, 12, 47–60.Google Scholar
  60. Wu, Z., & An, S. (2006). Using the model-strategy-application approach to developing pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and assessing their progress. Paper was presented at 2006 AERA Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  61. Wu, Z., & An, S. (2015). Teaching elementary and middle school mathematics using the MSA approach: Model, strategy, and application (2nd ed). Irvine: Education for All LLC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teacher EducationNational UniversityCosta MesaUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options